@JPB,
I don't consider him to be the RINO many of my colleagues swear loudly he is and why the fact that he took a position in the Obama Administration should somehow disqualify him from running for the GOP nomination is something I don't understand. His fiscal proposals seem close to just right and although I'm getting kind of tired of the fulsome way he touts his performance as governor of Utah, from what I know of it, it's a record for which he can be proud.
There's something about him I don't like though. Maybe it's the way he sounds like a writer for Obama campaign ads when he attacks some of his rivals.
I was particularly irked by his tweet:
“To be clear. I believe in evolution and trust scientists on global warming. Call me crazy,”
The clear implication here is that it's crazy
to not believe in evolution or not trust scientists on global warming.
I think people who do not "believe" in evolution (and all the different things that might mean) are wrong, or posturing but I don't think they are crazy. I will have a difficult time casting a vote for anyone who denies evolution has been operational for billions of years and believes the Bible's version of how the universe and all life therein came into being is precisely correct, but it certainly won't be the sole or most important issue for my consideration.
On the other hand I think there are very good reasons not to trust everything some scientists have been telling us about global warming and placing that issue along side evolution in terms of legitimacy is ridiculous.
What's annoying about Huntsman's comment is that he is not very subtly playing into the theme so many liberals have adopted about conservatives being anti-intellectual and somehow anti-science. It is a theme based on smug condescension which Huntsman is at least unwise to use on fellow Republicans.
I've already expressed in this thread that I am not particularly fond of the GOP candidates attacking one another during the nomination process, but I appreciate why (with the possible exception of Newt Gingrich) they all seem to think they must. Huntsman's attacks have seemed particualry shrill and nasty though and they almost always are poorly recieved by the debate audiences.
He certainly seems to have become this year's conservative of choice for liberals who feel the need to insist there is at least one Republican for whom they could cast a vote, and conservatives who really enjoy being invited to liberal dinner parties. Mort Zuckerman and David Brooks may have both broken up with the One with whom they became so infatuated in 2008, but I believe Huntsman still makes them weak in the knees. I shouldn't take this out on Hunstman, but I do.