Blickers
 
  6  
Wed 14 Sep, 2016 10:53 pm
@McGentrix,
Quote McGentrix:
Quote:
Yeah, it is terrible. There are a lot of people like that in the world that like to push other people's buttons til they hit that one that gets them the law suit. That's why everyone in Russia has a dash cam now.

It's amazing how conservatives believe every word of Putin's propaganda machine because they hate Obama so much. Dude, most people in Russia can't have dash cams because most people in Russia can't afford a car. Russia has never been able to give a good standard of living to it's people, no matter what the political system, and today is no exception. Check these stats:
GDP per capita:
Russia...............$11,039
USA..................$51,486

Most people in Russia can't afford to pay attention, let alone a car loan. But since Putin is not Obama, conservatives will believe everything Putin's propaganda machine tells them.
Builder
 
  -4  
Thu 15 Sep, 2016 01:41 am
@Blickers,

Quote:
Most people in Russia can't afford to pay attention, let alone a car loan.


Still got those blinkers on, I see....


Nick Gibbs
Automotive News Europe
July 19, 2013 08:59 CET -- UPDATED: July 19 13:33 CET - adds detail, quotes

MOSCOW -- The Russian auto market will overcome its current slump and overtake Germany to become the largest in Europe - and the fifth biggest globally - by 2020 as car ownership increases, a Boston Consulting Group study said.

Western carmakers including General Motors, Volkswagen, Ford Motor and Renault have invested heavily in Russia on expectations that the market will grow as a rising middle class buy cars for the first time or upgrade aging models.(end quote)

Source
snood
 
  4  
Thu 15 Sep, 2016 04:26 am
@cicerone imposter,
Quote:
Trump said Obama gives (11 million) illegal immigrants a free ride in this country. That's a lie.


It would be much easier to make a list of things the guy has said that are true. A much shorter list than the lies, too.
0 Replies
 
engineer
 
  6  
Thu 15 Sep, 2016 05:28 am
@McGentrix,
McGentrix wrote:

You done nothing here other than to prove you have no concept of what racism actually is beyond a label that will inspire hate among your other ignorant brethren.

Actually, what I have done is show that no matter how racist or bigoted Trump is, you will defend him, find ways to twist his words to look like something that a reasonable person would say. They're not, you know it.

McGentrix wrote:
Do you even know what racism is?

Yes, we both know what it is, but only one of us can call it out.
bobsal u1553115
 
  5  
Thu 15 Sep, 2016 05:40 am
@McGentrix,
Quote:
But, you know she was just goading him along.


I wonder what goaded him more: "ha-ha", being 69 years old, being a woman or the oxygen tank?

How many old crippled women have you ever sucker punched for laughing at you? What's your problem with civil free speech anyways?
McGentrix
 
  -1  
Thu 15 Sep, 2016 06:16 am
@engineer,
engineer wrote:

McGentrix wrote:
Do you even know what racism is?

Yes, we both know what it is, but only one of us can call it out.


Based on your writing, I honestly don't believe that you do know what racism really is. Please give me your understanding of the word racism and let's see if it jives with your ludicrous posts.
0 Replies
 
McGentrix
 
  -2  
Thu 15 Sep, 2016 06:19 am
@bobsal u1553115,
bobsal u1553115 wrote:

Quote:
But, you know she was just goading him along.


I wonder what goaded him more: "ha-ha", being 69 years old, being a woman or the oxygen tank?

How many old crippled women have you ever sucker punched for laughing at you? What's your problem with civil free speech anyways?


Dude was walking away from her and she just kept digging. Maybe he was an ex Russian who lost his family after he defected? Maybe the guy really hates Russians and the old lady brought up some kind of PTS issue in the guy. Who knows.

Her speech was civil? Hardly. She purposefully put herself in a position where something like that could happen. Just another pawn that can be removed from the board now.
0 Replies
 
revelette2
 
  4  
Thu 15 Sep, 2016 06:50 am
@bobsal u1553115,
Quote:
She asks if people find a Trump supporter punching her in the face deplorable.


Good for her. Or given her age maybe I should say "right on, man."
0 Replies
 
DrewDad
 
  5  
Thu 15 Sep, 2016 07:08 am
@georgeob1,
georgeob1 wrote:
rather shrill, humorless and self-absorbed - not very likeable.

Wait... I've lost track if you're talking about Clinton or Trump....
0 Replies
 
revelette2
 
  3  
Thu 15 Sep, 2016 07:15 am
Quote:
“Hillary Clinton has perfected the politics of personal profit,” the Republican nominee declared back in June. At that time, he was referring to allegations that Clinton had traded influence in the State department for donations to her family foundation. Then, as now, such accusations were not substantiated by any smoking-gun evidence of a quid pro quo. Rather, they were based on instances that gave off the appearance of conflicting interests — like when Clinton approved the sale of a uranium company, which was owned by a foundation donor, to the Russian atomic-energy agency.

For a typical Republican candidate, such apparent conflicts of interest would be fertile ground to mine for attacks. But Trump is not a typical Republican candidate. In fact, there has never been an American presidential candidate more vulnerable to accusations of apparent conflicts of interest than Donald J. Trump: The mogul owns a business that profits off the commercial value of his own name, which he licenses to real-estate developers the world over — many of whom have direct ties to foreign governments and political parties.

And Trump has no plans to meaningfully distance himself from his business interests should he take office. In fact, at points in his campaign, he has seemingly promised to abuse his public power to advance his private interests.

Officially, his position is that he will place the company in a “blind trust” — and that his adult children will oversee its day-to-day operations. But unless Trump plans to cut off all personal relations with his offspring, this arrangement is roughly the opposite of a blind trust.

What’s more, while the Clinton family profits only indirectly from donations to their charitable organization (via prestige, the power to give out cushy nonprofit jobs within the foundation), the Trumps make millions in direct profits from their corporation’s overseas partners and investors.
In his exposé on the Trump Organization’s foreign ties, published in Newsweek on Wednesday, Kurt Eichenwald concisely summarizes the overarching conflict this state of affairs represents:

Eichenwald’s investigation is worth reading in full, but here are a few of the countries where he suggests Trump’s financial interests — and America’s national interest — may come into conflict:

South Korea

The Trump Organization has financial ties to Daewoo Engineering and Construction, a South Korean firm that, among other things, aids in the development of nuclear power plants. At various points in his campaign, the GOP nominee has suggested South Korea may need to finance its own defense, including the development of a nuclear deterrent to its northern enemy. Trump’s business partner could, ostensibly, profit from such a development. But it’s far from clear that kicking South Korea out from under America’s “nuclear umbrella” would be in our national interest, or in that of global stability.

India

Trump has licensed his name to a pair of 22-floor towers that Panchsil Realty seeks to build in the city of Pune. But in August, the local government found discrepancies in its land records “suggesting that the land on which the building was constructed may not have been legally obtained by Panchshil.” The investigation is ongoing.

The Pune project is just one of several ventures the Trump Organization has in the South Asian country, as Donald Jr. advertised earlier this summer.
“We are very bullish on India and plan to build a pan-India development footprint for Trump-branded residential and office projects,’’ Donald Trump Jr. told the Hindustan Times, shortly before the Republican National Convention. “We have a very aggressive pipeline in the north and east, and look forward to the announcement of several exciting new projects in the months ahead.”

Like most real-estate developments, many projects in that pipeline will require the cooperation of Indian authorities. Eichenwald spells out the potential conflicts this presents:

Turkey

In 2008, the Trump Organization inked a branding deal with one of the most politically connected developers in Turkey. When the Dogan Group opened Trump Towers Istanbul in 2012, Turkish president Recep Tayyip Erdoğan presided over their ribbon-cutting.

But Aydin Doğan was indicted in a fuel-smuggling scheme back in March. With the family falling out of political favor — and Trump rebranding himself as America’s leading Islamophobe — Erdogan called for the mogul’s name to be removed from the towers this past June.

Turkey is a key ally in America’s fight against ISIS. A President Trump would enter office amid a feud with its president over a lucrative business deal. It’s possible this latter fact could jeopardize the former one.

Azerbaijan

Trump has partnered with local developer Garant Holding, to construct a real estate project in the nation’s capital. Garant is controlled by Anar Mammadov, the son of Azerbaijan’s transportation minister Ziya Mammadov. U.S. diplomats suspect the elder Mammadov may have laundered money for the Iranian military.

Trump’s development with Garant is currently on hold, but not canceled. If it goes through, and if U.S. intelligence has concluded that the Mammadovs are, indeed, involved in laundering money for Tehran, it’s possible that Trump’s foreign policy on Iran and Azerbaijan could be compromised by his business partner’s other interests.

Eichenwald details other potential conflicts, including in the United Arab Emirates, Ukraine, and Russia. In some cases, the examples he cites could be framed as evidence that Trump will not allow his business interests to infringe on his policies: The Republican nominee’s Muslim ban has been a disaster for his interests in the UAE. However, as with Turkey, this fact could sour diplomatic relationships between Trump and America’s Middle East allies from day one.

“My father already said he would put it into a blind trust and it would be run by us,”
Ivanka Trump explained on Good Morning America Wednesday morning, in response to Newsweek’s story. “So he’s been very articulate on that fact and outspoken, but this is so much bigger than another deal and we all recognize that.”

Meanwhile, the Trump campaign’s ambassador to CNN, Corey Lewandowski, suggested that Eichenwald’s report could be dismissed because the reporter has said that George W. Bush was involved in 9/11. (Eichenwald has said no such thing).

“My whole life I’ve been greedy, greedy, greedy. I’ve grabbed all the money I could get,” Trump said at a Republican debate in January. “I’m so greedy. But now I want to be greedy for the United States.”

This November, the American people will decide whether to not to believe a “greedy, greedy, greedy” man when he says he has their best interests in mind.


If Clinton Needs to Close Her Foundation, Trump Needs to Dissolve His Company

The piece speaks for itself.
0 Replies
 
DrewDad
 
  7  
Thu 15 Sep, 2016 07:23 am
@McGentrix,
McGentrix wrote:

That's sad. It's terrible when these things happen because it only give Trump supporters a black eye. But, you know she was just goading him along. It's bad that he fell for it.

That has to be one of the most reprehensible things I've ever seen you write. It really says everything about you that I need to know.
Below viewing threshold (view)
maporsche
 
  5  
Thu 15 Sep, 2016 07:57 am
@McGentrix,
McGentrix wrote:
Let me ask you this, when a westboro church member gets a beat down, do express an equal amount of outrage?


Words are never an rarely a excuse for violence (if ever). Not in the case of a westboro baptist church member nor in the case of a 69 year old grandmother (that the two are even comparable in your mid is disgusting).
McGentrix
 
  -4  
Thu 15 Sep, 2016 07:58 am
@bobsal u1553115,
As expected, there is more video than what the newsies have been showing.

Let's look at this "peaceful" protest and see what actually happened...



If you actually watch the video, you see an old guy being led by his wife tripping over the curb and traffic cones being approached from behind as they wind through an aggressive crowd of anti-Trump protesters. You can see at :55 that this "lifelong protester" reaches out to grab the guy and he turns and accidentally elbows her before all the usual loud screaming happens.

Once again, just another bullshit story trying to villainize Trump and those that support him.
izzythepush
 
  4  
Thu 15 Sep, 2016 08:04 am
@maporsche,
It just shows how acceptable casual violence is for the deplorables.
0 Replies
 
High Strangeness
 
  -4  
Thu 15 Sep, 2016 08:09 am
Trump wants to "make America great again", so I don't see why any patriotic loyal American would disagree with that..Smile
By contrast, Hillary comes across as a wide-eyed bimbo mumsy housewife with no bite..Smile
0 Replies
 
McGentrix
 
  -4  
Thu 15 Sep, 2016 08:10 am
@maporsche,
Watch the video I posted.

You don't see 2 protester's as being comparable? I did not suggest that either cause was comparable, not did I suggest that I find either acceptable.

One is protesting something you are for (anti-Trump) and the other something you oppose (dumb ass anti-homosexual). But, both are entitled to protest, right? Both should be allowed to do so with out violence being perpetrated against them, right?

I am baffled by your feigned outrage.
0 Replies
 
McGentrix
 
  -4  
Thu 15 Sep, 2016 08:20 am
Here is a better, less sideways version with help for the visually impaired amongst you. Also, I don't want you guys guys saying "ZOMG! Breitbart! ARGH!!!"

0 Replies
 
High Strangeness
 
  -4  
Thu 15 Sep, 2016 08:26 am
Serves the traitorous old biddy right for not wanting America to be great again, she's probably a closet commie..Smile

WIKI- "The Communist Party USA is a Marxist-Leninist political party in the United States. It has about 20,000 members today.
It does not usually field candidates, but instead encourages votes for the Democratic Party"
http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Communist_Party_USA

0 Replies
 
bobsal u1553115
 
  5  
Thu 15 Sep, 2016 08:37 am
@McGentrix,
Quote:
Let me ask you this, when a westboro church member gets a beat down, do express an equal amount of outrage?


Name one instance of a Westboro member ever getting a beat down. Laughing at at someone and calling dead servicemen fags and hated by the Almighty are two way different things.

Why do your love the Second Amendment sooooooooo much and hate the First Amendment soooooooooo much?
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.11 seconds on 12/23/2024 at 06:40:00