Hitler DNA Tests Show He Likely Had Jewish, African Roots, Daily Mail Says

There has been speculation and this news has confirmed that Hitler has genes that are common with the subhumans such as Jews and Africans. This discredits Hitler's claim to Aryan superiority unless you support Nazism, a race based political system, then it is nothing special.

There has been speculation and this news has confirmed that Hitler has genes that are common with the subhumans such as Jews and Africans. This discredits Hitler's claim to Aryan superiority unless you support Nazism, a race based political system, then it is nothing special.

Hitler's Ahnenpass was sold.
http://www.germanmilitaria.com/Galleries/Paper.html

I looked at it and certainly can't trace back to 4,000 years when Judaism started with Abraham in 2,000 BC. Anyway the Jews were the first to start this lineage nonsense.

The first law, The Law for the Protection of German Blood and German Honour,[12] prohibited marriages and extramarital intercourse between "Jews" (the name was now officially used in place of "non-Aryans") and "Germans" and also the employment of "German" females under forty-five in Jewish households. The second law, The Reich Citizenship Law [13], stripped persons not considered of German blood of their German citizenship and introduced a new distinction between "Reich citizens" and "nationals".

I looked at it and certainly can't trace back to 4,000 years when Judaism started with Abraham in 2,000 BC. Anyway the Jews were the first to start this lineage nonsense.

The Romans didn't keep records as they didn't care as long as they were masters.

A fundamental difficulty of studying ancient history is that recorded histories cannot document the entirety of human events, and only a fraction of those documents have survived into the present day.[15] Of those that have, the reliability of the information obtained from these records must be considered.[15][16] Few people were capable of writing histories, as literacy was not widespread in almost any culture until long after the end of ancient history.[17]

The Roman Empire was one of the ancient world's most literate cultures,[18] but many works by its most widely read historians are lost. For example, Livy, a Roman historian who lived in the 1st century BC, wrote a history of Rome called Ab Urbe Condita (From the Founding of the City) in 144 volumes; only 35 volumes still exist, although short summaries of most of the rest do exist. Indeed, only a minority of the work of any major Roman historian has survived.

Historians have two major avenues which they take to better understand the ancient world: archaeology and the study of source texts. Primary sources are those sources closest to the origin of the information or idea under study.[19][20] Primary sources have been distinguished from secondary sources, which often cite, comment on, or build upon primary sources.[21]

Religion fanaticism is just a bane of humankind.

If you need to have "fanaticism" explained to you, you wouldn't understand any explanation for it.

cicerone imposter wrote:

If you need to have "fanaticism" explained to you, you wouldn't understand any explanation for it.

I do not assume everyone has the same semantics.