@BillRM,
Quote:Silly rabbit and the issue was not the statute of limitations although that is a concern but going back and changing the laws so there would be more punishments then existing at the time the suppose crimes happen as you stated you wish would had happen in this case.
In addition to your barely literate, garbled manner of expressing yourself, you appear to have serious comprehension problems as well. Izzy said no such thing, and he already pointed that out to you.
Quote:The likelihood that he could had been subject to this kind of prosecution under the US legal system seem remote.
No, I believe he would be similarly prosecuted in the U.S., and I already posted current cases to illustrate that people here are, in fact, charged with, and prosecuted for, crimes of sexual assault which took place decades ago. And our police and prosecutors also search for other possible victims because those who commit sexual assaults tend to repeat these types of crimes. Knowing another complainant has come forward, and was listened to, often helps to empower others to report their sexual assaults, and to be willing to testify, even decades later.
What really seems to bother you about this man's conviction is that his victims were listened to, taken seriously, found credible, and they were
believed. And now he is being made to pay for his crimes against them.
You just hate to see sexual predators have to face the consequences of their actions.