@hawkeye10,
Again, you have misinterpreted the articles you posted. Unless you are suddenly in agreement with the view that the justice system is unfair and biased in its treatment of rape victims because it helps to promote the view that that the woman "asked for it". And such myths are what prompted this thread.
The article you posted said...
Quote:Anyone who observes the justice system's approach to rape can attest to this; behavior in the victim that may have seemed relatively innocuous before the rape suddenly looks like the height of dirty sluttitude when portrayed by the defense team, allowing juries to let accused rapists off because the victims were supposedly asking for it.
The article says nothing about "sex law"--it refers to the type of tactics defense attorneys use to assail the characters of rape victims, and which feed into rape myths that a woman deserves to be raped, or "asked for it", because of her mode of dress, or drinking habits, or past sexual behaviors.
You also misinterpreted this statement...
Quote:They demonstrate the futility of having outsiders who don't understand a woman's intimate situation trying to parse whether or not she deserves an abortion, whether or not she's put enough of a good faith effort into fitting their model of chaste womanhood to get the abortion she needs
That statement refers to outsiders trying to judge a woman's right to an abortion based on whether she fits into their standards of morality in her sexual conduct--something, according to the writer, that should not enter into a decision about whether a woman is entitled to an abortion.
Similarly, juries should not decide whether or not a woman was raped because of their moral view of
her behavior.
But, look what you came up with
Quote:
They demonstrate the futility of having outsiders who don't understand a couple's intimate situation trying to parse whether or not the man deserves to be charged with rape, whether or not he's put enough of a good faith effort into fitting their model of none threatening male to get the sexual freedom he needs
An issue of possible sexual assault becomes, according to you, "a couple's intimate situation". So, the woman who is sexually assaulted on a street, or sexually assaulted by a man she just met in a bar, is suddenly part of a "couple" and in an "intimate situation"?
The main legal issue in determining whether a sexual assault took place is whether there was
consent. Whether the
man has violated the rape law by
acting without consent.
It has nothing to do with giving a male "the sexual freedom he needs". No one, neither males nor females, has the "freedom" or the "right" to engage in unwanted or non-consenting sexual activity with another person. Once your behavior intrudes or impinges on the civil rights of others, you no longer have unbridled "freedom".
Your absurd sense of entitlement--to use other peoples' bodies--against their wishes--for your own sexual gratification--is mind -boggling.
When your sexual behavior involves another person, you no longer have the legal "freedom" to do whatever you want to do, unless the other person is freely willing and in agreement with you--they must be consenting.
And, if you don't like that, or you worry about criminal charges being lodged against you, just stick to masturbation.
The laws will not be altered to allow you to legally sexually assault someone because you find pesky details, like "consent", an impediment to
your gratification of
your sexual needs.
If you see property belonging to another person that you want, or even need, and you take it, without consent or permission, you are a thief. If you have sexual intercourse without the consent or permission of the other person, you are a rapist.
It's just that simple.
You resent the power of another person to deny you want you want--and you have voiced that resentment loud and clear throughout this thread. You may fancy yourself as a sexual freedom fighter but you sound more like a toddler who is throwing a temper tantrum because mommy just said you can't have a cookie, and, if you try to steal the cookie, you'll get spanked. Your thinking is really that juvenile. You resent a woman's power to say, "NO" to your sexual actions--toward
her--and you blame feminists for their role in helping to codify that into law. Stop sulking, and grow up. Women have civil rights too--including the right not to be sexually assaulted, by you or anyone else.