@Arella Mae,
Arella Mae wrote:
I will agree I don't have much patience when it comes to people defending (in any way) a man that raped a child. I don't think anyone should have patience for that.
So you believe an act can be horrible enough to be unforgivable?
Ah, well.
hawkeye10 wrote:
Justice requires that the greater good be taken into account, you keep forgetting that part JTT. The goal here is justice, it is not the hanging of everyone who we have a right to hang. The latter is the goal of those who are out for blood, not justice.
Justice is about equal treatment, not about general contentment. Its also a subjective thing, although many deny it, I like to demonstrate it with a simple paradox:
A man has two pieces of bread and another has none. Is it just to take away one piece of bread of the man who has two and give it to the man who has none?
That is why I do not believe in justice, but in general contentment. I prefer an injust society where everyone is happy to a just society where someone is not.
djjd62 wrote:
you remember poorly, no such law or even suggestion was made, the basis of the ruling was that you can't use ignorance as an excuse, the 13 year old said many times that he was thirteen (even though his profile apparently said 18), and the adult ignored this information and kept pressing his agenda
Oh, I must have mistaken an exageration for the actual news. My bad.
Albeit that was not the only reason I think Canada is over the top. there are also the limitations on the artistical representation of underage sexuality. How bad they are, I do not know for sure, but I personally think any kind of artistic representation should be allowed as long as it does not involve any real people.
hawkeye10 wrote:
Quote: I personally don't like the term "informed consent
I dont like the whole concept....it was much better back when consent was assumed unless one party voiced non consent. The state invalidating consent after the fact and thus turning the other person into a rapist has to go too. The feminist driven "improvements" have made a hash out of sex law, and now routinely abuses individuals.
Its the same thing. Just like a person who "silently consented" can claim to have said no later, a person who consented can claim to have said not later.