do you think any of the candidates can make a difference, if elected?

1. well that worked out real well, didn't it? :no:

2. It's negotiation not appeasement. If we can save American lives with negotiation then it should always be an option. This is you just being bull-headed, no problem has ever been solved that way.

3. Obama disassociated himself from wright for that very reason. And why should his wife be proud of America if it is performing unethical acts? If you support you country even when it is acting unethically that is called "nationalism" and history has shown time and again that it is very dangerous. people should always think critically.

4. No in fact i don't, people have been so desperate to attack him they've gone so far as insinuating his "fist bump" was a terrorist sign, tell me that that isn't the least bit ridiculous.

5. has it not crossed your mind that they already have and support him anyway? black people would sooner support a white man that reflects their values than a black man who does not.

6. he is black......and he is white.

And apparently what he doesn't do, as I will show shortly.

If your idea of "America matters" is lapel pins and other superficial tokens, I am extremely sorry. America is more to me than that. You could say it's the only thing I have any "faith" in.

Here's the judging Obama on what he didn't do. Did he plan any attacks? Did he say anything wrong about "whitey"? No? Really.

You mean Obama... didn't do any of those things?

This "passive" support is the Right scraping the bottom of the barrel. Same with the "fist tap" thing. Seriously, is this all you can bring up?

Typical. Tepid. Pathetic. And guess what? Won't work!

Mickey didn't stop them! He knew how inflammatory these people were, he should have broken from them! He supports Hagee and Parsley passively. Hagee's and Parsley's attitudes were known LONG before McCain sought their support.

Besides, who's campaign? Who is responsible for it? I'm hoping the person whose name it bears.

You can't say? Therefore you are pulling this out of your ass. Sounds about right. NEXT.

Absolutely frightening that your definition of "liberal" is that skewed.

Well, seeing that you are bringing nothing to the table but a bunch of baseless arguments, it would seem that your comedy is the defense I speak of.

His campaign is. Like it should. I see there's no counterargument from you on this topic.

My idea has to do with Americans taking care of themselves. Taking responsibility for themselves. Never waiting for the government to do anything for them. Self control. Education. being what people take upon themselves to learn. Not depending on some government entity to train them and judge them as educated. My America needs no government. Government is good for nothing but building and maintaining streets and maintaining a military to protect our nation and kick whoever's ass needs kicked.

Obama sat in Wright's church being indoctrinated for 20 years.
Of course the politician can not nor will ever state that he supports the antics of the moron. He knows he would lose whitey. I did not say he is stupid. He is not. I don't have good things to say about him. But, I assure you, I don't consider him stupid.

McCain's background with Hagee is short lived. Whatever you turn it into won't get you far.

My definition of liberal may well be skewed in your eyes. But, anyone who is not functioning for the good of the nation is a liberal. Liberals only care about issues important to themselves. You know, the ones that drag a nation down like homos and abortion and the saving of lives of people who opt to take life.
Liberalism. A nasty filthy business. Designed for nothing more than to create a nation of anything goes and no consequences.

By the way, what have you brought to table? Any reason someone would vote for Obama?