Drakej
 
  1  
Reply Sat 1 Dec, 2007 09:04 pm
@Freeman15,
92 You just saved me a whole lot of time. I was trying to find the link to that info because my grandfather attempted to shorten a shotgun many years ago and never finished it. I wanted to make sure if it where cut off if it would still be legal but he missed the mark by two inches.

And just to specify, I said he Started to cut it he did not actually shorten the barrel.
92b16vx
 
  1  
Reply Sat 1 Dec, 2007 09:09 pm
@Drakej,
Drakej;47194 wrote:
92 You just saved me a whole lot of time. I was trying to find the link to that info because my grandfather attempted to shorten a shotgun many years ago and never finished it. I wanted to make sure if it where cut off if it would still be legal but he missed the mark by two inches.

And just to specify, I said he Started to cut it he did not actually shorten the barrel.


That's my whole point. If I take a 26" Remington Wingmaster, and cut it down to 21" with a hacksaw, I have a "sawed off" shotgun, but it is still completely legal with no Form, if I make it 19" it is illegal UNLESS I filled out a Form 1, sent it off, and got my tax stamp like I did for my AKS-74U. When I got my shorty AK it has a 16" barrel, the minimum legal length, I filled out my paperwork, sent it to the BATFE with a money order. A month later it came back with a stamp on it, so I took a hacksaw and cut the barrel, squared the face on a mill and grinder, then had it recrowned, baddaboom, baddabing, "sawed off", shortbarrelled rifle, 100% legal.
0 Replies
 
Pinochet73
 
  1  
Reply Sat 1 Dec, 2007 09:09 pm
@Drakej,
Drakej;47194 wrote:
92 You just saved me a whole lot of time. I was trying to find the link to that info because my grandfather attempted to shorten a shotgun many years ago and never finished it. I wanted to make sure if it where cut off if it would still be legal but he missed the mark by two inches.

And just to specify, I said he Started to cut it he did not actually shorten the barrel.


Doesn't matter. I've alerted the FBI. Run. Hide. Ditch the piece, now.Very Happy
0 Replies
 
Drakej
 
  1  
Reply Sat 1 Dec, 2007 09:33 pm
@Freeman15,
Pino they already know where I live, I kinda work for the feds Wink

I think that info will help a lot of people understand what exactly is legal and illegal. The mass media has demonized guns to the point where if you own a weapon that looks like a gun used in a movie it is obviously illegal.

Also he is some info on weapons usage:

Table 27 - Law Enforcement Officers Killed and Assaulted, 2006

Table 33 - Law Enforcement Officers Killed and Assaulted, 2006
Pinochet73
 
  1  
Reply Sat 1 Dec, 2007 09:39 pm
@Drakej,
Drakej;47206 wrote:
Pino they already know where I live, I kinda work for the feds Wink

I think that info will help a lot of people understand what exactly is legal and illegal. The mass media has demonized guns to the point where if you own a weapon that looks like a gun used in a movie it is obviously illegal.

Also he is some info on weapons usage:

Table 27 - Law Enforcement Officers Killed and Assaulted, 2006

Table 33 - Law Enforcement Officers Killed and Assaulted, 2006


I shot 30-.06, 150-grain, FMJ today. Feel like a million bucks.:thumbup::thumbup::thumbup:
0 Replies
 
Pinochet73
 
  1  
Reply Sat 1 Dec, 2007 09:42 pm
@Drakej,
Drakej;47206 wrote:
Pino they already know where I live, I kinda work for the feds Wink

I think that info will help a lot of people understand what exactly is legal and illegal. The mass media has demonized guns to the point where if you own a weapon that looks like a gun used in a movie it is obviously illegal.

Also he is some info on weapons usage:

Table 27 - Law Enforcement Officers Killed and Assaulted, 2006

Table 33 - Law Enforcement Officers Killed and Assaulted, 2006


I'm telling you, Drake -- your conspiracy nightmares will end the second the Feds arrest me. I HELPED GEORGE BUSH PULL OFF 911. I DID IT. I AM THE ONE. End the conspiracies. I DID IT. You were all correct. I am the perp. Now call in the Feds and end this conspiracy crap.:leghump:
0 Replies
 
Drakej
 
  1  
Reply Sat 1 Dec, 2007 09:46 pm
@Freeman15,
So what have I said that is a conspiracy?
Fatal Freedoms
 
  1  
Reply Sat 1 Dec, 2007 11:48 pm
@Drakej,
Drakej;47188 wrote:
When you acknowledge that a SBS is a Sawed off shotgun how can you ask to have them banned?


SBS is NOT a sawed-off shotgun! A shotgun is a SBS.

what you've just said is like calling all cars a cadillac!
92b16vx
 
  1  
Reply Sun 2 Dec, 2007 12:04 am
@Fatal Freedoms,
Fatal_Freedoms;47222 wrote:
SBS is NOT a sawed-off shotgun!


Correct

Quote:
A shotgun is a SBS.


Huh? I am guessing you meant to say..."A sawed off shotgun is a SBS."

Quote:
what you've just said is like calling all cars a cadillac!


Correct
0 Replies
 
Freeman15
 
  1  
Reply Sun 2 Dec, 2007 12:48 am
@Fatal Freedoms,
Fatal_Freedoms;47181 wrote:
many people target practice just because they like to target practice, and sawing off the end of a shotgun will not aid you in aim!


Actually, with a shotgun being used for personal protection, it does. A shorter barrel, especially when coupled with a shortened or collapsing stock aids in swing time and control during successive firings, and adds stability to sight picture when pumping (ejecting spent shells and chambering new ones).

I've been using long guns my entire life, and you're right, shorter barrels DO hinder your aim in the realm of accuracy. HOWEVER, your fire is more precise given shorter barrels on shoulder-fired weapons, and in a CQC situation, I have no doubt about accuracy, what I want is precisio


Quote:
you don't need good aim to shoot someone in-front of you!


Just to make sure, I have a 19" barrel that fires a spread of .32 caliber pellets each time I pull the trigger instead of a pistol that only fires 1 9mm round. If I come out shooting with my shotgun, empty it, and the guy is still standing.....I deserve to die anyway.



Quote:
yes but shooting deer isn't illegal.


A Remington 700 is a deer rifle, you know who else uses it? The Marine Corps Scout Sniper School, the FBI HRT, NUMEROUS local SWAT agencies, etc. I put a better scope, add an all-weather stock (the one being stored at my place has a really nice wooden one on it), and wa-bam, I have one of the finest sniper systems in the world. GOOD hunters (ie, no blinds or stands) could easily turn their attention to people, and while they're not SNIPERS, they can certainly pose a threat to your average soldier or LEO.



Quote:
I understand where you are comming from but for the last time i'm ONLY talking about sawed-off shotguns (weapons that are illegally altered to aid in commiting a crime)


An SBS is designed to kill people suddenly and at close-range.....so is a pistol. In fact pistols are the DEADLIEST firearms in this country by all measures, yet they remain legal while SBS's are not, why? Politicians like Rep. McCarthy of New York watch a movie or read a hit-piece on the NRA and think they know something about weapons, and so seek to outlaw weapons that AREN'T DANGEROUS to the general public. Most people who own "assault weapons" and the like are responsible, albeit destructive (be honest guys, blowing away hundreds of dollars worth of ammo is FUN) people who see a genuine need for owning weapons that have parity with the military. Your average street thug has NO CLUE how his gun works, and so generally can't modify it at all. Gun laws only punish the good guys, plain and simple.



Quote:
Weapons thats sole purpose is to commit crime should be illegal. Can we at least agree on this much?


No weapon's "sole purpose" is to commit crime. I use my shotgun to defend my home and destroy things at the range, but I could just as easily use it to rob a store or kill an innocent person. PEOPLE dictate an object's uses, not the object. Using your logic, we should ban all cars that can exceed 80mph, because capabilities above that can ONLY be used to break the law, when in actuality they might be necessary to say, avoid an accident, or get to a hospital. Some people will abuse their freedoms, but until they do, let them do as they please. Not only is it the most ethical and practical thing to do, the Constitution says it's the law.


By the way:

The Ruger P90 is a badass pistol, ignore the online reviews. I've easily put 400 rounds through it now without so much as a feed-jam (a few misfires, but blame that on shitty ammo). Cheap, dependable, and ugly as sin.
0 Replies
 
Pinochet73
 
  1  
Reply Sun 2 Dec, 2007 02:38 pm
@Drakej,
Drakej;47212 wrote:
So what have I said that is a conspiracy?


Dunno. You just strike me as a diet-variety conspiracist. I won't argue at length with conspiracists. Once you start listening to their homespun fables and myths, you can get drawn in. No thanks. It's foolishness.:no:
0 Replies
 
Drakej
 
  1  
Reply Sun 2 Dec, 2007 02:59 pm
@Freeman15,
Uhhhh okay Pino whatever you say buddy. Just because I do not agree with every thing you say does not really give you the right to call me a conspirator.
Fatal Freedoms
 
  1  
Reply Sun 2 Dec, 2007 06:35 pm
@Drakej,
Just so you know, i'm not some crazy anti-gun person i just think that there are exceptions to almost every rule, in fact i think the only illegal weapons should be your rocket launchers, grenades and sawed-off shotguns!
Drakej
 
  1  
Reply Sun 2 Dec, 2007 07:01 pm
@Freeman15,
I never thought you where an Anti Fatal, but making just those exceptions would open Pandora's Box. Take .50 cal rifles, there are a lot of practical reasons for owning a .50 but the media wants you to believe that they are only used for shooting down planes and blowing up school buses full of sick kids and nuns. If we banned SBS's then pretty much every other firearm will be outlawed as well. No civilian can own a Destructive Device such as Grenades, RPG's and the like so those are kinda two separate issues. Also there is really no productive reason for owning a grenade or RPG launcher.
Fatal Freedoms
 
  1  
Reply Sun 2 Dec, 2007 07:16 pm
@Drakej,
Drakej;47259 wrote:
I never thought you where an Anti Fatal, but making just those exceptions would open Pandora's Box. Take .50 cal rifles, there are a lot of practical reasons for owning a .50 but the media wants you to believe that they are only used for shooting down planes and blowing up school buses full of sick kids and nuns. If we banned SBS's then pretty much every other firearm will be outlawed as well. No civilian can own a Destructive Device such as Grenades, RPG's and the like so those are kinda two separate issues. Also there is really no productive reason for owning a grenade or RPG launcher.


if you take the second amendment completely literally that would include all weapons,

"..you have the right to bare arms.."

arm is a gaelic word meaning "weapon",

but does that mean that the second amendment allows all citizens to own any weapon without restrictions including Rocket launchers, Frag grenades, 60 calibur mounted machine guns, large chain guns, and mortars?
klyph
 
  1  
Reply Sun 2 Dec, 2007 07:32 pm
@Fatal Freedoms,
Fatal_Freedoms;47260 wrote:
if you take the second amendment completely literally that would include all weapons,

"..you have the right to bare arms.."

arm is a gaelic word meaning "weapon",

but does that mean that the second amendment allows all citizens to own any weapon without restrictions including Rocket launchers, Frag grenades, 60 calibur mounted machine guns, large chain guns, and mortars?


Yes, there's no reason to outlaw the possession of rocket launchers, frag grenades, 50 caliber machine guns, large chain guns, or mortars. There are already laws against their misuse, so laws against their possession are pointless. Civilians should have military strength comparable to govt. authorities.
0 Replies
 
Drakej
 
  1  
Reply Sun 2 Dec, 2007 07:51 pm
@Freeman15,
Yes it should. But that is not the case. There are already laws against owning weapons of destruction. But as far as completely outlawing other arms that are not already dis allowed is wrong and ill informed. It is our Right as Americans to own firearms, just because one person does not see a point behind a weapon does not mean it is evil. A firearm/knife/(insert item) is a tool. It is up to the operator as to what that tool is used for.
Fatal Freedoms
 
  1  
Reply Sun 2 Dec, 2007 07:53 pm
@Drakej,
Drakej;47265 wrote:
Yes it should. But that is not the case. There are already laws against owning weapons of destruction. But as far as completely outlawing other arms that are not already dis allowed is wrong and ill informed. It is our Right as Americans to own firearms, just because one person does not see a point behind a weapon does not mean it is evil. A firearm/knife/(insert item) is a tool. It is up to the operator as to what that tool is used for.


Define "weapons of destruction"!
0 Replies
 
Drakej
 
  1  
Reply Sun 2 Dec, 2007 08:15 pm
@Freeman15,
92b16vx
 
  1  
Reply Mon 3 Dec, 2007 12:04 am
@Drakej,
Drakej;47272 wrote:


Actually, you can own them under the NFA, any other weapon, and destructive devides, same process as a full auto, suppressor, or SBR, SBS.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
  1. Forums
  2. » Gun Control
  3. » Page 3
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.28 seconds on 11/14/2024 at 11:12:08