0
   

Conservative Values

 
 
Reply Sat 8 Sep, 2007 12:05 am
Second Amendment
Low Taxes
Personal Responsibility
America First
States' Rights


Can we agree that these are core conservative values?
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Discussion • Score: 0 • Views: 4,022 • Replies: 68
No top replies

 
briansol
 
  1  
Reply Sat 8 Sep, 2007 12:37 am
@Freeman15,
on paper, yes. but only one candidate supports all those. and his name is ron.
aaronssongs
 
  1  
Reply Sat 8 Sep, 2007 01:16 am
@Freeman15,
Freeman15;35848 wrote:
Second Amendment
Low Taxes
Personal Responsibility
America First
States' Rights


Can we agree that these are core conservative values?



Can we agree that core liberal values are:

First Amendment
Taxation of the Wealthy
Personal Responsibility
America First
Individuals' Rights
92b16vx
 
  1  
Reply Sat 8 Sep, 2007 01:43 am
@aaronssongs,
aaronssongs;35854 wrote:
Can we agree that core liberal values are:

Taxation of the Wealthy



This is NOT a liberal value (not a real liberal anyway), it may be a democrat value, but democrats are not nescessarily liberals. Taxing someone because they made a lot of money, and redistributing it to the poor is A) thievery, and B) Socialist.

America IS a capitalist society, and that works in its favor. Look at all the socialist and communist countries past and present, third world mostly. If people have no reason to work hard, they don't, and in order to maintain a progressive society, we need to work hard. Look at the poor areas in the country, they sit around and blame everyone else for their problems, and try to milk the system for what they can get, it drains the system, and leaves less for what is actually needed.
Silverchild79
 
  1  
Reply Sat 8 Sep, 2007 09:19 am
@Freeman15,
Freeman15;35848 wrote:

States' Rights


This one is difficult to say. A large, but often overlooked reason for the Civil War was Federal Control Vs State control, the south wanted things like Slavery and other issue to be left up to the state while the Union wanted Federal control.

Fast forward to today and the Dems want Abortion to be a national thing and Republicans want it to be state to state, knowing that President Lincoln was a Republican it's fair to say that this issue swings both ways
Freeman15
 
  1  
Reply Sat 8 Sep, 2007 09:23 am
@Silverchild79,
Silverchild79;35894 wrote:
This one is difficult to say. A large, but often overlooked reason for the Civil War was Federal Control Vs State control, the south wanted things like Slavery and other issue to be left up to the state while the Union wanted Federal control.

Fast forward to today and the Dems want Abortion to be a national thing and Republicans want it to be state to state, knowing that President Lincoln was a Republican it's fair to say that this issue swings both ways


Republicans want a federal ban on abortion, it's in the party platform.

I'm talking about CONSERVATIVES, ie, the guys who vote republican because the GOP is slightly less psychotic than the DNC.
Silverchild79
 
  1  
Reply Sat 8 Sep, 2007 11:38 am
@aaronssongs,
aaronssongs;35854 wrote:
Can we agree that core liberal values are:

Taxation of the Wealthy
Personal Responsibility
America First


the problem with Taxing the wealthy in the manner the Dems currently want is invariably hard working self made individuals will suffer and at some point those who do as little as possible will benefit from it. I'm not against extra taxes on the super rich but honestly if we took away their ability to avoid taxes it would probably solve the problem.

Personal Responsibility? Liberal judges are the ones who put drug deals in treatment instead of prison and uphold the "victim" mentality

America First? In allot of ways yes, but they also want Amnisty for those who are not Americans

Liberalism embodies the politics of convenience at the cost of long term prosperity
Freeman15
 
  1  
Reply Sat 8 Sep, 2007 11:41 am
@Silverchild79,
Silverchild79;35940 wrote:
the problem with Taxing the wealthy in the manner the Dems currently want is invariably hard working self made individuals will suffer and at some point those who do as little as possible will benefit from it. I'm not against extra taxes on the super rich but honestly if we took away their ability to avoid taxes it would probably solve the problem.

Personal Responsibility? Liberal judges are the ones who put drug deals in treatment instead of prison and uphold the "victim" mentality

America First? In allot of ways yes, but they also want Amnisty for those who are not Americans

Liberalism embodies the politics of convenience at the cost of long term prosperity


Conservatives support EQUAL taxation.

Personal Responsibility. What I put in my body, from beer to blow is my business. Prison for nonviolent drug offenders is ridiculous.

Amnesty*
aaronssongs
 
  1  
Reply Sat 8 Sep, 2007 11:59 am
@92b16vx,
92b16vx;35857 wrote:
This is NOT a liberal value (not a real liberal anyway), it may be a democrat value, but democrats are not nescessarily liberals. Taxing someone because they made a lot of money, and redistributing it to the poor is A) thievery, and B) Socialist.

America IS a capitalist society, and that works in its favor. Look at all the socialist and communist countries past and present, third world mostly. If people have no reason to work hard, they don't, and in order to maintain a progressive society, we need to work hard. Look at the poor areas in the country, they sit around and blame everyone else for their problems, and try to milk the system for what they can get, it drains the system, and leaves less for what is actually needed.


Agreed (with the first part) However, is it unreasonable to expect everyone, including "the rich" to pay their fair share? ( we all know there are tax loopholes which the rich ply their lawyers to shield them against paying their "fair share" of taxes....don't be naive, I'm not)
America is indeed a capitalist society, and also, "allegedly", compassionate yet conservative. People should work, and hard. However, if the playing field is not level, and equal opportunity is just a slogan and not a practice..then people start to fall through the cracks, and get left behind, and overlooked, and due to the human drive of survival, are forced "to survive", by any means necessary (and we all know that code)...hence, it would behoove society to insure that good nutrition and prenatal care is afforded to all. Good and affordable education, and child care is afforded to all...programs which promote personal responsibility should be funded and accessible...people should be offered a living wage, to be able to support their families, without having to struggle because of minimum or low wages. Common sense ought to be the default mode instead of profiteering and unfair business practices...etc...
Personal responsibility, yes, but marginalization, bias, prejudice, and favoritism, and general disdain for the worker class, no.
0 Replies
 
aaronssongs
 
  1  
Reply Sat 8 Sep, 2007 12:06 pm
@Freeman15,
Freeman15;35895 wrote:
Republicans want a federal ban on abortion, it's in the party platform.

I'm talking about CONSERVATIVES, ie, the guys who vote republican because the GOP is slightly less psychotic than the DNC.


Really? And here I was thinking that no entity was as deranged as the RNC, which might explain all of the "dirty tricks", and the jockeying for "soft money", and the failure to execute any reform concerning campaign financing.
One need only look to Tom Delay, and his redistricting shenanigans concerning Texas, which he did with the help of the RNC, and the laundering and shuttling of funds through it....isn't he still under indictment? Hmmmmm.....
92b16vx
 
  1  
Reply Sat 8 Sep, 2007 12:08 pm
@Freeman15,
I am all for closing any, and ALL tax loopholes that the wealthy use to get out of paying their fair share...100%. I just don't think that it's fair to tell them that because they were successful, they should have to pay beyond their fair share to redistribute to people, who while not all, don't pull their weight for society.
0 Replies
 
aaronssongs
 
  1  
Reply Sat 8 Sep, 2007 12:26 pm
@Silverchild79,
Silverchild79;35940 wrote:
the problem with Taxing the wealthy in the manner the Dems currently want is invariably hard working self made individuals will suffer and at some point those who do as little as possible will benefit from it. I'm not against extra taxes on the super rich but honestly if we took away their ability to avoid taxes it would probably solve the problem.

Surprisingly, I agree.

Personal Responsibility? Liberal judges are the ones who put drug deals in treatment instead of prison and uphold the "victim" mentality.

Don't go there. Liberal judges are not the problem...weak or arcane laws, and the the failure to enforce the laws that are on the books, is the problem.
Drug dealers are different than "drug users"...dealers should have one kind of justice and "users" should have another. Dealers (especially of large quantities) should be processed to the fullest extent of the law. Users do not belong in prison...they belong in treatment facilities, where their needs and root cause for using drugs can be addressed...true compassion is what is called for. Nothing less.


America First? In allot of ways yes, but they also want Amnisty for those who are not Americans
No, not true...Amnesty (correctly spelled), should be approached on a "case by case" basis...everyone's story is different. Some illegals are bringing nothing to the table, while others could not be more of an asset to the fabric of American society by way of skills, artistic ability, and general knowledge.

Liberalism embodies the politics of convenience at the cost of long term prosperity


That's a cute bumper sticker, but patently untrue...
Liberalism has nothing to do with convenience, but reality, on the ground, and practicality. It's practical to educate the underclass, in the hopes that they might rise up and contribute back to society, in some meaningful way...to do otherwise is to invite disaster...how is that convenient? How is that negatively impacting "long term prosperity"????
0 Replies
 
Drnaline
 
  1  
Reply Sat 8 Sep, 2007 12:27 pm
@briansol,
briansol;35849 wrote:
on paper, yes. but only one candidate supports all those. and his name is ron.

I feel another endorsement coming on, LOL.
0 Replies
 
Drnaline
 
  1  
Reply Sat 8 Sep, 2007 12:29 pm
@aaronssongs,
aaronssongs;35854 wrote:
Can we agree that core liberal values are:

First Amendment
Taxation of the Wealthy
Personal Responsibility
America First
Individuals' Rights
If you have personal responcibility why would you need to tax just the wealthy?
Freeman15
 
  1  
Reply Sat 8 Sep, 2007 12:40 pm
@aaronssongs,
aaronssongs;35959 wrote:
Really? And here I was thinking that no entity was as deranged as the RNC, which might explain all of the "dirty tricks", and the jockeying for "soft money", and the failure to execute any reform concerning campaign financing.
One need only look to Tom Delay, and his redistricting shenanigans concerning Texas, which he did with the help of the RNC, and the laundering and shuttling of funds through it....isn't he still under indictment? Hmmmmm.....


I'm speaking from an ideological standpoint, and would certainly never vouch for the character of a member of the federal government (save the likes of Paul and Kuccinich(sp?)). Fact is, neo-liberal economics rely on one segment of the population happlily working extremely hard while the other segment does little to no work. It is inherently flawed.
0 Replies
 
aaronssongs
 
  1  
Reply Sat 8 Sep, 2007 03:13 pm
@Drnaline,
Drnaline;35971 wrote:
If you have personal responcibility why would you need to tax just the wealthy?


Is it just that you are lazy, or just that you have a problem spelling words???
Because it getting a little tedious and tired about now.
I would tax the wealthy, because chances are , their wealth was procured by "unsavory" business practices....not all, mind you, but a fair chunk.
And perhaps, I just don't like rich people, because more than likely, money has corrupted their sensibilities, and there is a sense of entitlement, quite similar to those who are fully capable of working, but elect not to, and have their hands out seeking something for nothing....oooh, how anti-liberal of me!
Freeman15
 
  1  
Reply Sat 8 Sep, 2007 03:46 pm
@aaronssongs,
aaronssongs;35997 wrote:
Is it just that you are lazy, or just that you have a problem spelling words???
Because it getting a little tedious and tired about now.
I would tax the wealthy, because chances are , their wealth was procured by "unsavory" business practices....not all, mind you, but a fair chunk.
And perhaps, I just don't like rich people, because more than likely, money has corrupted their sensibilities, and there is a sense of entitlement, quite similar to those who are fully capable of working, but elect not to, and have their hands out seeking something for nothing....oooh, how anti-liberal of me!



So you propose taxing a group of people MORE because there is a POSSIBILITY that they procured their wealth through illicit activities? Here in Bexar County, our sherriff was indicted for accepting gifts to the tune of $50k. That's chump change, and yet it was illegal, wake up.

You want equality? Everybody pays the same percentage whether they make $100 a day or $100,000. This way, everybody pays their fair share.
aaronssongs
 
  1  
Reply Sat 8 Sep, 2007 03:49 pm
@Freeman15,
Freeman15;36004 wrote:
So you propose taxing a group of people MORE because there is a POSSIBILITY that they procured their wealth through illicit activities? Here in Bexar County, our sherriff was indicted for accepting gifts to the tune of $50k. That's chump change, and yet it was illegal, wake up.

You want equality? Everybody pays the same percentage whether they make $100 a day or $100,000. This way, everybody pays their fair share.


Fine...get rid of all tax breaks, loopholes, backroom deals, kickbacks, lobbying, slush funds, and we have a deal. However, we both know that will never happen, due to greed...so the deal is off. Sorry.
Freeman15
 
  1  
Reply Sat 8 Sep, 2007 04:02 pm
@aaronssongs,
aaronssongs;36005 wrote:
Fine...get rid of all tax breaks, loopholes, backroom deals, kickbacks, lobbying, slush funds, and we have a deal. However, we both know that will never happen, due to greed...so the deal is off. Sorry.


Again you lump all of the rich into a single category and convict them of crimes of which you have no evidence. Using your reasoning we should take all guns away from blacks because many of them shoot each other.
aaronssongs
 
  1  
Reply Sat 8 Sep, 2007 04:41 pm
@Freeman15,
Freeman15;36009 wrote:
Again you lump all of the rich into a single category and convict them of crimes of which you have no evidence. Using your reasoning we should take all guns away from blacks because many of them shoot each other.


Why not...all blacks and immigrants are lumped together, stereotyped, and hung out to dry...why wouldn't what's good for the goose be good for the gander...why is there a double standard? Could it be bias? Racism? Class-ism?
And notice, I didn't say "all", you misquoted me. I said "some".
And no, I think everybody's guns should be taken away...don't get me twisted.
Everybody...Guns should be outlawed. no questions.
As much as you'd like, things are not so much "black and white" as they are "shades of grey".
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
  1. Forums
  2. » Conservative Values
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 05/02/2024 at 09:40:36