0
   

Marxist statements made by Hillary Clinton

 
 
socalgolfguy
 
  1  
Reply Sat 15 Sep, 2007 10:17 am
@socalgolfguy,
Not to speak for Red, but I believe, like her, that if proper attention is not paid to this subject in the UK and the Muslims are free to move about and conduct their radical activities with the full support of your subject citizens and parliament, Sharia Law MAY be inevitable. Maybe not in my lifetime and hopefully not yours, but eventually.
scooby-doo cv
 
  1  
Reply Sat 15 Sep, 2007 12:22 pm
@socalgolfguy,
socalgolfguy;37278 wrote:
Not to speak for Red, but I believe, like her, that if proper attention is not paid to this subject in the UK and the Muslims are free to move about and conduct their radical activities with the full support of your subject citizens and parliament, Sharia Law MAY be inevitable. Maybe not in my lifetime and hopefully not yours, but eventually.


well im a liberal/socialist/leftie whatever RED wants to call me,and i certainly dont want SHARIA LAW,and neither does the british people,do you think because im a liberal/democrat that we will just roll over and let it happen ?
socalgolfguy
 
  1  
Reply Sat 15 Sep, 2007 02:00 pm
@scooby-doo cv,
scooby-doo;37285 wrote:
well im a liberal/socialist/leftie whatever RED wants to call me,and i certainly dont want SHARIA LAW,and neither does the british people,do you think because im a liberal/democrat that we will just roll over and let it happen ?


No, in the end, I do not think so. Just keep an eye on your back. I want you to be a ripe old man having lived a long and glorious free life, when you croak.
0 Replies
 
Red cv
 
  1  
Reply Sun 16 Sep, 2007 02:24 pm
@scooby-doo cv,
scooby-doo;37285 wrote:
well im a liberal/socialist/leftie whatever RED wants to call me,and i certainly dont want SHARIA LAW,and neither does the british people,do you think because im a liberal/democrat that we will just roll over and let it happen ?


You already are, over half the Mosque in England are run by hardcore Islamic Radicals. England refuses to ban the worst of the lot, and Radical Islam grows daily. England is gutless in dealing with this vermin, women and little girls being forced to live as if it were the seven century because England is more concerned with Race Relations than law enforcement or terrorism. Take the time to read the entire article Scooby, frankly it's time you started to read what's happening in England because Scotland will be next.

Part of the story: The rest here: Family Security Matters

The Talibanization of Britain

By Adrian Morgan

The Ideology of Deoband


One of the principle doctrines of the Deobandi ideology is that it is a Muslim's duty to wage war (Jihad) upon the enemies of Muslims, wherever they may be. National borders are inconsequential, and a student's loyalty should be to Allah before the country in which he lives. Boys at Haqqania are taught to memorize the Koran in Arabic, prevented from talking or looking at each other. They have no idea what the Arabic words mean.



In parts of NWFP, the "Pakistan Taliban" wield power, and like their Afghan counterparts they are hostile to women who appear "Westernized." On Friday last week, two women were found decapitated near the town of Bannu, close to the Afghan border. They had been kidnapped the day before. A note left with the bodies claimed they were "prostitutes."



Britain's Deobandi Mosques

Last week, London?s Times and the Daily Mail newspapers carried the alarming news that followers of the Deobandi doctrine have taken over almost half of Britain's mosques. In Lancashire in the north of England, out of 75 mosques in Blackburn, Bolton, Preston, Oldham and Burnley, 59 of these are now run by Deobandi clerics. There are 26 Islamic seminaries in Britain ? which produce 80% of homegrown clerics for mosques ? and of these 17 are run by Deobandis. A police report claims that of the 1,350 mosques in Britain, more than 600 of these are now run by Deobandis. In London, about 170 mosques are said to be run by Deobandis.

The man regarded as the most influential of Britain's Deobandis is Riyadh ul Haq. He has written two books, ?The Salah of a Believer in the Quran and Sunnah? and ?The Causes of Disunity.? He was embroiled in a controversy last year, when he was due to talk to 1,000 young Muslims in Canada. Ul Haq was scheduled to address them at the Youth Tarbiyah conference, held in Toronto in early July. He had been invited by the Islamic Foundation of Toronto. He had also been booked to appear at the "Guidance" conference in Montreal in late June, and his itinerary had also included Hamilton, Ontario. His visit was cancelled when Monte Solberg, Canada's immigration minister, decided that Ul Haq's extreme opinions might incite terror and hatred.



The Canadian Jewish Congress mobilized an unusual coalition of Muslims, Hindus, Jews and gay rights campaigners to lead the protests against Ul Haq's visit. He had visited Canada four times previously, including addressing 15,000 people at a "reviving the Islamic Spirit" conference, held at Toronto's Rogers Center in 2005. Tarek Fatah, communications director for the Canadian Muslim Congress, who also hosts a weekly TV Muslim TV show, said at the time: "He's a nasty piece of work. All he will do [is] create doubt in the minds of young people [as to] whether Canada, as a society, is a viable place for Muslims to live in." Ul Haq did address the Tarbiyah conference, but via a video link.



The campaign against Ul Haq's visit to Canada had released extracts of his speeches, indicating a contempt for the West, for Jews, and women. In one speech, he had said: "Of the peoples of the Earth, the ones that hate Muslims the most, the ones who are bitterest of their enmity towards Muslims, the most unrelenting, unforgiving, are the Jews and the mushrikin (Hindus), idolaters in all their forms."


Ul Haq ? full name Abu Yusuf Riyadh Ul Haq ? was born in Gujarat in 1971, and when he was aged three he had migrated with his family to Britain. He entered the Deobandi Darul Uloom Al-Arabbiyah Al-Islamiyyah at Bury, near Bolton in Lancashire, northern England, at the age of 13, and graduated in 1991. This seminary was founded in 1975 by Yusuf Motala, another extremist immigrant from Gujarat in India. Following his graduation, Ul Haq became the imam at Birmingham's Central Mosque. He has since taught at the Madinatul Uloom Al-Islamiyyah in Kidderminster, which was also founded by Yusuf Motala.

In August 2004, Ul Haq was named in a feud which cost the lives of two people. On July 29, 2004, 35-year old Azmat Yaqub (pictured) was shot dead as he worked out at a gym. A fortnight before he was shot several times at the gymnasium in Sparkhill, Mr Yaqub had become a father. Earlier, on March 17, 2003, Mr Yaqub had been hit by gunshot in his shoulder, a victim of a drive-by shooting. Shaham Ali, a companion who had been with him, was shot in the head and died. In the March 2003 killing, six people were arrested, and two were charged with attempted murder. The murder charges were rejected by a court, but one of the two accused was sentenced to two years? jail. 31-year-old Mohammed Sharafit Khan was found guilty of false imprisonment and assault. Two others were found guilty of false imprisonment.

Khan had invited the secretary of Birmingham Central Mosque, Mr. Shockat Lal, to his home. There, the victim was kept captive and repeatedly beaten over a period of one and a half hours. The secretary had had an affair with a woman, and she had fallen pregnant. What incited the anger of young Muslims from the mosque was the fact that the woman was Riyadh ul-Haq's wife. As she was Ul Haq's second wife, the marriage was not legal. Ul Haq had taken offense, and had sacked Shockat Lal. Others who supported the secretary were either expelled from the mosque or ostracized. In March 2003, Ul Haq was arrested from the home of his father, Mohammed Gora Pirbhai, who was an imam at a mosque in Leicester. Ul Haq was questioned about the drive-by murder, but received no charges. The two men who had died were friends of Shockat Lal.

Ul Haq's arguments that women are inferior to men still appear on the website of Birmingham Central Mosque. The Mosque website also has articles extolling the virtues of Deoband and also the extremist missionary group Tablighi Jamaat. The shoe bomber Richard Reid, the American Taliban John Walker Lindh, and members of the ISI have links with this group. Two of the 7/7 bombers attended a Tablighi Jamaat mosque in Dewsbury. Dr. Mohammed Naseem has been the chairman of the mosque for 32 years, and he claims to be a "moderate." Naseem, who was Riyadh Ul Haq's boss for a dozen years, is convinced he is being targeted for MI5 surveillance.

Three weeks after the 7/7 bombings, Naseem tried to claim that the four bombers were innocent, despite DNA evidence. Speaking of 7/7, he called Tony Blair a ?liar? and an ?unreliable witness.? He has publicly questioned the existence of al Qaeda. Naseem runs the Islamic Party of Britain and has said that homosexuals should be executed. Naseem is a major funder to the "Respect" party, whose only MP is George Galloway. After the atrocities of 9/11, Naseem had said that "we are not convinced that those people who perpetrated these actions were actually Muslims."



In January 2006, Britain's most senior civil servant was forced to withdraw an invitation which had been extended to Riyadh Ul Haq. The government had invited him to speak at a function marking the end of Eid ul-Fitr (the end of Ramadan) later that year. The decision was made after people had complained.



Riyadh Ul Haq is opposed to Muslims forming friendships with non-Muslims, whom he refers to dismissively as "kuffaar," claiming that the kuffaar exert an "evil influence." The Times quotes from one of his sermons: "We are in a very dangerous position here. We live amongst the kuffar, we work with them, we associate with them, we mix with them and we begin to pick up their habits."


The Mail quotes him as saying: "The Koran teaches Muslims not to follow in the footsteps of the Jews and the Christians, yet of our own choice we decide to live, act, work, behave, enjoy and play just like the kuffar...Allah has warned us in the Koran, do not befriend the kuffaar. The Jews and Christians will never be content with you until you follow their way."



Ul Haq praises the Taliban, as they share the same ideology, and he is contemptuous of Christians, Jews and Hindus. He openly and frequently ridicules "moderate" Muslims as evidenced in a sermon against "Jewish Fundamentalism." As they are classed as traitors by Ul Haq and his ilk, some moderate Muslims are understandably outraged by this aspect of Deobandi thinking.



Ul Haq also praises armed Jihad. He said in July 2001: "And no one dare utter the 'J' word. The 'J' word has become taboo. The 'J' word can never be mentioned and if someone mentions it, even Muslims look at one another. So much is happening and yet we are expected to remain silent."



On November 11, 2003, Ul Haq's "guru", Yusuf Motala, was detained under the Terrorism Act 2000 at Heathrow airport for seven hours, when he was preparing to fly to Mecca and Medina. His supporters were outraged. One of these, a graduate of the Bury Darul Uloom, said: "More than 75% of the English speaking Imams in the U.K. are graduates from the Darul Ulooms. (An) attack on Shaykh Yusuf Motala is an attack on the entire Muslim community." The graduate claimed that the Deobandi seminaries provided imams for the prison service and for hospitals, and that the Bury Darul Uloom is linked to the University of Preston.



Yusuf Motala was sent to Britain by a leading figure in Tablighi Jamaat, Muhammad Zakaria Kandhlawi (1898 ? 1982). This man was a famous Deobandi scholar whose father had been renowned for his knowledge of the Hadiths (traditions of the prophet). Zakaria himself was a teacher of Hadiths. Zakaria urged Motala to go to Britain to "light the candle of Islam in a land of darkness." Despite being widely praised as a scholar, there are critics of Zakaria who claim that he actually fabricated many stories which he passed off as "authentic" Hadiths. When Motala founded the Darul Uloom in Bury in 1975, he did so with funding from Saudi Arabia.



The Times' reporting on the Deobandi movement in Britain is not before its time. Deobandi ideas have led to the Taliban, and if the governing Labour party is serious in its attempts to defuse radicalism, it should have acted far sooner to quell Deobandi activities. Other sermons from Riyadh ul-Haq, which the Times has reproduced, are: "The Globalized Suffering of the Muslims", "On Our Responsibilities as Muslims"
scooby-doo cv
 
  1  
Reply Sun 16 Sep, 2007 03:17 pm
@Red cv,
red i have already seen this,yes they're are radical islamist's in the UK,and the govenrment need to clamp down on them,and have done ! you seem to think the muslims are taking over the country,and want people to believe that by why you quote in your posts,well they're are 1.6 million muslims in the UK,and i can assure you that they are not taking over the country !

BY THE WAY,DO YOU STILL THINK SHARIA LAW IS LEGAL IN THE UK ?
OBSERVANTREVIEWER
 
  1  
Reply Mon 17 Sep, 2007 06:48 pm
@scooby-doo cv,
Red your comment that over half the mosques are run by hard core muslim radicals does appear to be a bit of an exageration (sorry for sarcasm no offence couldn't resist it).It's obviously an exagerration and typical of blinkered thinging brought on by following the main stream press BS on asylum and muslim issues.Remember there is afar bigger problem in UK and in any Capitalist country worldwide.It's called the Super irch or Establishment, theyre the b u g g g e r s who control our everyday lifes, control our media (ie thought control), control our politicians through investment into party coffers and have a major influence over govt policies in fact prob the most major one (otherwise why would they invest if they weren't getting something for it) even though we don't elect them to have an influence over the policies.So waken up, welcome to the real woprld, there are far bigger problems than asylum seekers and muslim clerics, don't fall into the obvious trap of trying to blame them for everything and therefore letting the real s c u m off the hook.By vermin i took it youi menat the Super rich or Establishment.Again just being sarcastic knew you didnt mena that but of course you should have.

Yes scooby doo it's one of the umpteen total misconceptions of the left wing based on lies and thougth control of majority of public through main stream papers and tv news, that the lefdt wing beuing soft hearted are therefore soft and will let anyone get away with anything.Instead truth is notice the word truth people not being rude just mean compared to what the press and tv news says about left wing and what communism is all a bunch of bare faced lies, the left wing because we have morals and principles a concept alien to a lot of people in todays cut throat capitalist system who blindly follow the dogma of the capitalist press etc, we would actually have far tougher sentences for some crimes, we'd stamp down on selfish parents who dont control their kids and make everyones life a misery, wed teach kids aome manners and introduce them to that concept dont mean all kids are lacking in manners just mean theres small minority in most pooreer areas nationally who make evryone elses life a hell, and of course we wouldn;'t let anything happen which caused real conflict and division between peoples in this country and we do realise that majority of Muslims are not bad people and that prob only minority of mosques nowhere near majority of mosques have these hardcore muslim radicals that Red was talking about but those that did practice things that caused conflict or division between peoples wed stamp down on.So entirely opposite to general publics misconception (just following the Capitalist lies like fools) we'd actually be far tougher on certain things but that's because we have the morals and principles that lot of general public (not saying all know theres lot of good people too and bad ones are just fools brain washed into fitting in and following System lies by media) and main party politicians don't have and because we'd be doing so to (yes we have a concept of it unlike main stream parties who always note always get in on less than half the vote) protect and help the interests of the majority.
mlurp
 
  1  
Reply Mon 17 Sep, 2007 11:31 pm
@OBSERVANTREVIEWER,
Great reads now my head hurts........... But only part of the picture IMHO.
Later
0 Replies
 
aaronssongs
 
  1  
Reply Tue 18 Sep, 2007 09:55 am
@OBSERVANTREVIEWER,
OBSERVANTREVIEWER;37849 wrote:
Red your comment that over half the mosques are run by hard core muslim radicals does appear to be a bit of an exageration (sorry for sarcasm no offence couldn't resist it).It's obviously an exagerration and typical of blinkered thinging brought on by following the main stream press BS on asylum and muslim issues.Remember there is afar bigger problem in UK and in any Capitalist country worldwide.It's called the Super irch or Establishment, theyre the b u g g g e r s who control our everyday lifes, control our media (ie thought control), control our politicians through investment into party coffers and have a major influence over govt policies in fact prob the most major one (otherwise why would they invest if they weren't getting something for it) even though we don't elect them to have an influence over the policies.So waken up, welcome to the real woprld, there are far bigger problems than asylum seekers and muslim clerics, don't fall into the obvious trap of trying to blame them for everything and therefore letting the real s c u m off the hook.By vermin i took it youi menat the Super rich or Establishment.Again just being sarcastic knew you didnt mena that but of course you should have.

Yes scooby doo it's one of the umpteen total misconceptions of the left wing based on lies and thougth control of majority of public through main stream papers and tv news, that the lefdt wing beuing soft hearted are therefore soft and will let anyone get away with anything.Instead truth is notice the word truth people not being rude just mean compared to what the press and tv news says about left wing and what communism is all a bunch of bare faced lies, the left wing because we have morals and principles a concept alien to a lot of people in todays cut throat capitalist system who blindly follow the dogma of the capitalist press etc, we would actually have far tougher sentences for some crimes, we'd stamp down on selfish parents who dont control their kids and make everyones life a misery, wed teach kids aome manners and introduce them to that concept dont mean all kids are lacking in manners just mean theres small minority in most pooreer areas nationally who make evryone elses life a hell, and of course we wouldn;'t let anything happen which caused real conflict and division between peoples in this country and we do realise that majority of Muslims are not bad people and that prob only minority of mosques nowhere near majority of mosques have these hardcore muslim radicals that Red was talking about but those that did practice things that caused conflict or division between peoples wed stamp down on.So entirely opposite to general publics misconception (just following the Capitalist lies like fools) we'd actually be far tougher on certain things but that's because we have the morals and principles that lot of general public (not saying all know theres lot of good people too and bad ones are just fools brain washed into fitting in and following System lies by media) and main party politicians don't have and because we'd be doing so to (yes we have a concept of it unlike main stream parties who always note always get in on less than half the vote) protect and help the interests of the majority.


Well-said, and well-met! Kudos.
I am so sick and tired, as a liberal moderate Democrat, of being painted as the "scion of Satan", and lacking in morality, judgement, and conjones, by conservative 'riff-raff", every g.d day...Everyday, I have listen to simplistic dribble about "cutting and running", socialism and the fall of the West, impending doom from radical Islam, and every other hyperbole and exaggeration distorted minds can conceive of...it's tiring...it's boring....it's reminiscent of the political satire presented on "Rocky and Bullwinkle" (if you get my meaning).
There fanatics are "clutching at straws", trying to be seen as relevant and tough, when, if called to "the front", would feign every malady in the book, in order to get out of "active duty", fighting for their beloved country, that they all claim....from the comforting confines of their internet monitors. Cowards,
and mind-controlled sheep, all.
0 Replies
 
g-man
 
  1  
Reply Sat 15 Dec, 2007 10:35 am
@OBSERVANTREVIEWER,
OBSERVANTREVIEWER;37108 wrote:
It seems to be an automatic reaction from most Americans anyway, when talking of socalled Marxists, that Marxism is inherently wrong. i wonder hoe many Americans actually truly know what Marxism is or realise that true Marxism has never happened and not just because of the lies you are told by Fox,billionaires backing main parties (they're unelected but are the major influence behind govt policies Democracy don't make me laugh) it's all because of your spies and sometimes plants in countries trying to break away from Capital;ist Selfish Indoctrination through Education system, compete get the better job, better house car and media.Your side uses propaganda and mind control too but they never say so and true Marxists which i am and very proud to say so im nopt conned by the Education system and media training me to be selfisah and fit in with the system and believe there is no alternative that is obviously why they tell you all the lies.True Communism never happened because of another massive reason that countries didn't do it at same time and support each other to keep out of trade and USA financially blackmailing them ie through arms race and grain deals to force them back towartds Capitalism.Trotsky and up to 300 of his followers believed in this and stood up to Stalin they and people like me are the true Communists and they were hunted down and killed so hopw on earth can western media have said we supported USSR and Stalin dirtiest lie ever told this Pinkoe rubbish evryone knows most of USA is paranoid about Communists but e few actually know what it is and that its never happened Your politicians and media are duping you.


You're right Observant. True communism has never existed. The reasons it has never existed has little to do with outside entities such as the U.S. or other capitalistic entities. The demise always began with the premise of proclaimed "fairness". For it to work, would require everyone giving themselves over to a government that had their best welfare at heart. Governments have no heart. Governments have only one goal in mind. Self preservation.
Every attempt at Communism quickly succumbed to the strongman syndrome.
People always support the strongman like flies to the flame. All he has to do is say the right things. Then crush any opposition dumb enough to expose itself.
The strongman, for the sake of appearance, will speak of fairness then view any signs of "success" by individuals as a threat to himself rather than progress for his people.
The pipe dream of Communism will always fail, then fade as long as humans have any sense of self. Which you of course would define as selfishness. You and your's are of course wrong and doomed.
socalgolfguy
 
  1  
Reply Sat 15 Dec, 2007 12:22 pm
@g-man,
g-man;48658 wrote:
You're right Observant. True communism has never existed. The reasons it has never existed has little to do with outside entities such as the U.S. or other capitalistic entities. The demise always began with the premise of proclaimed "fairness". For it to work, would require everyone giving themselves over to a government that had their best welfare at heart. Governments have no heart. Governments have only one goal in mind. Self preservation.
Every attempt at Communism quickly succumbed to the strongman syndrome.
People always support the strongman like flies to the flame. All he has to do is say the right things. Then crush any opposition dumb enough to expose itself.
The strongman, for the sake of appearance, will speak of fairness then view any signs of "success" by individuals as a threat to himself rather than progress for his people.
The pipe dream of Communism will always fail, then fade as long as humans have any sense of self. Which you of course would define as selfishness. You and your's are of course wrong and doomed.


Everyone get it..? Pay attention, here. I agree completely. Governments worldwide will say and do anything to maintain control over their subjected citizens keeping them in the dark, ignorant and dependent.
0 Replies
 
socalgolfguy
 
  1  
Reply Sat 22 Dec, 2007 12:52 pm
@socalgolfguy,
I started this thread because it is an interesting topic and should have provoked comments. All that happened is that Scooby hijacked it by attacking a former member.

Come on - someone must have an opinion on Hillary's Marxist comments.....
Good or bad, let the remarks fly.
DurtySanches
 
  1  
Reply Tue 25 Dec, 2007 09:51 am
@socalgolfguy,
That's all Scoob is good for it seems? He's gotta cast the light somewhere else Hillary isn't. Subversion?
scooby-doo cv
 
  1  
Reply Tue 25 Dec, 2007 06:00 pm
@socalgolfguy,
socalgolfguy;49281 wrote:
I started this thread because it is an interesting topic and should have provoked comments. All that happened is that Scooby hijacked it by attacking a former member.

Come on - someone must have an opinion on Hillary's Marxist comments.....
Good or bad, let the remarks fly.


Get your facts right,the last time i posted on this thread red was still a member of the board,and i didnt hijack it,i responded to her post.
0 Replies
 
scooby-doo cv
 
  1  
Reply Tue 25 Dec, 2007 06:01 pm
@DurtySanches,
DurtySanches;49434 wrote:
That's all Scoob is good for it seems? He's gotta cast the light somewhere else Hillary isn't. Subversion?


why did you change your name :beat:
0 Replies
 
DurtySanches
 
  1  
Reply Wed 26 Dec, 2007 08:08 am
@socalgolfguy,
why does anyone?
scooby-doo cv
 
  1  
Reply Wed 26 Dec, 2007 02:00 pm
@DurtySanches,
DurtySanches;49475 wrote:
why does anyone?


isw it because your banned under your other name ?
DurtySanches
 
  1  
Reply Thu 27 Dec, 2007 10:30 pm
@scooby-doo cv,
scooby-doo;49481 wrote:
isw it because your banned under your other name ?

I answer to many names.
g-man
 
  1  
Reply Thu 27 Dec, 2007 11:23 pm
@Crito,
Crito;36020 wrote:
I think a lot of people will vote for any Republican, whomever the party choses, just so Hillary won't become president. Which is a real shame if you ask me, as a voting for a Democan or Republicrat is the same as wasting your vote.


What do you expect the voters to do? The mold is cast this voting season. Every democrat represents "free" health care. Monies for college. Money for every ailment Americans suffer. Little difference between them, except for the amounts they promise to provide to people by stealing effects from the work that working people perform. Republicans differ in the amount of security they are willing to provide, also at the cost of the working man. There are definite differences in the parties. The dumocrats, are going to drive America into ruin. Not only with give aways that amount to nothing more than socialism, but with the abandonment of security issues. Such as our southern border.
The Republicans in the last congress conducted themselves as tax and spend Dumocrats and cause worry that future Republicans may act the same. They'd better get their heads out of their rectums and remember that fiscal responsibility is what they are about.
0 Replies
 
scooby-doo cv
 
  1  
Reply Fri 28 Dec, 2007 11:40 am
@DurtySanches,
DurtySanches;49546 wrote:
I answer to many names.


i bet you do Very Happy: :beat:
0 Replies
 
Pinochet73
 
  1  
Reply Tue 1 Jan, 2008 09:55 am
@socalgolfguy,
Hill and Bill are both closet Marxists. Don't be fooled. They never outgrew their 1960s radicalism.
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
Copyright © 2026 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 03/07/2026 at 10:46:26