@Drnaline,
Drnaline;28971 wrote:No. I'm a big boy, i can handle myself.Nope, no crime was commited.Think it is does not make it so. Maybe in its wisdom but not of it's making. It's made out of materials that are of this earth, sorry.Well if your's is devine then so is mine. If mine is not then yours can't be.You are protected in this country for that but your book is not. You may own a copy of the Quran but the Quran itself no one owns. If he took your book and did some thing i can see you having a point but if he did what he did with his quran i also believe you have no sayso as to what happens. I can go buy a quran and do with it as i please.Yes you do, in this country. It that so for Christians where you are from?Nope, sorry. No such thing as that right.
ok let me ask u again differently:-
1- would it be right that people should be let to insult any one they want even publicly and not get arrested?
2- no crime was commited by insulting a billion christians or muslims? , u know it does not matter if it is really a holybook made of diamonds that came down from heaven or written on toilet paper, what matters is a persons beliefe in that book, not the material the book was written on, u r missing the bog picture, u say a person can only own a copy of the Quraan, the book it self no one owns, U R ABSOLUTELY RIGHT, buying a copy does not make any one the owner of the book, only of the copy, but then again all this does not matter, no crime u think? what is a crime then? stabing a person? killing some one, burning him alive? all these crimes are limited, disecrating a holy book insults a whole nation of nation(s) behind it, and let ask be objective , why would any one flush a holybook , i mean this is of no use to any one , except sick minded people, u must see the the so called freedom of speech if looked upon the way u do now will start to put minorities in ur country in a second class citizen position whether u like it or not, whether u admit it or not, because the majority (usually controling all power sources like the media) will be able to (freely express what ever they hate about the minority) when the later can not do anything about it, freedom of expression must be subjected to logic , if something u do insults any one else then u shouldnot be able to do it, why do we wear cloth? why would any one walking naked on the road be arrested for exposure (or what its called) is not that his freedom of expression ( looolz ) what ever u say Drnaline u can never justify the disecration of a holybook by freedom of expression.