1
   

Michael Vick indited for dog fighting

 
 
socalgolfguy
 
  1  
Reply Wed 25 Jul, 2007 01:16 pm
@Silverchild79,
None of this has anything to do with the topic at hand. Enough....
Pinochet73
 
  1  
Reply Wed 25 Jul, 2007 02:41 pm
@scooby-doo cv,
scooby-doo;27742 wrote:
even if she was,she would still be more intelligent that bush :thumbup:


What are you going to say about Skag Hillary, Scoob, when, after she's been Prez for one, two, three or four years, US troops are still in Iraq? Will you keep blaming Dick and Bush? How about after EIGHT years, Scoob? Will it still be their fault. Think that one through. It's going to happen. Mark my words.
Pinochet73
 
  1  
Reply Wed 25 Jul, 2007 02:44 pm
@Silverchild79,
Somebody please lay out the gruesome details about Vic. I've heard he executed dogs that lost in the pit. I heard he had them shot, hanged and beaten. He might even have done this grisly stuff himself. Sicko, the real one.
0 Replies
 
scooby-doo cv
 
  1  
Reply Wed 25 Jul, 2007 03:00 pm
@Pinochet73,
Pinochet73;27757 wrote:
What are you going to say about Skag Hillary, Scoob, when, after she's been Prez for one, two, three or four years, US troops are still in Iraq? Will you keep blaming Dick and Bush? How about after EIGHT years, Scoob? Will it still be their fault. Think that one through. It's going to happen. Mark my words.


dick and bush,have created one hell of a mess in iraq,get the troops out as soon as possible :thumbup:
0 Replies
 
Pinochet73
 
  1  
Reply Thu 26 Jul, 2007 06:52 pm
@Silverchild79,
You gotta know Al Sharpton, JESSE, and Julian Bond are watching this Vick thing closer than the hairs on their mistresses' you know what, poised to throw down the race-card. They've probably already analyzed it from every conceivable, racial viewpoint.
0 Replies
 
socalgolfguy
 
  1  
Reply Fri 27 Jul, 2007 09:42 am
@Silverchild79,
I wonder if this is one of those circumstances where the property involved in the alleged felony might be seized by the state and sold off..? If so, the cost to the guilty party would be quite substantial.
0 Replies
 
Pinochet73
 
  1  
Reply Fri 27 Jul, 2007 10:33 am
@Silverchild79,
Bastard Geraldo Rivera defended Vick lastnight on Billow O'Reilly, claiming animals are not people. Lock that scumbag up.
rugonnacry
 
  1  
Reply Sat 28 Jul, 2007 06:23 am
@Silverchild79,
Scoob. DO you like watching Hannah Montana?
scooby-doo cv
 
  1  
Reply Sat 28 Jul, 2007 08:41 am
@rugonnacry,
rugonnacry;28065 wrote:
Scoob. DO you like watching Hannah Montana?


you will have to enlighten me,who is hannah montanna ?
0 Replies
 
scooby-doo cv
 
  1  
Reply Sat 28 Jul, 2007 08:50 am
@rugonnacry,
rugonnacry;28065 wrote:
Scoob. DO you like watching Hannah Montana?


i have now found out its a childrens tv programme,nope i dont watch it :thumbup:
0 Replies
 
rugonnacry
 
  1  
Reply Sat 28 Jul, 2007 09:09 am
@Silverchild79,
Ummm FTR Dogs ARENT people.
socalgolfguy
 
  1  
Reply Sat 28 Jul, 2007 09:57 am
@rugonnacry,
rugonnacry;28079 wrote:
Ummm FTR Dogs ARENT people.


Are you saying that because they are not human that they should not be protected under the law against cruel and inhumane torture by a bunch of under educated morons..?
Drnaline
 
  1  
Reply Sat 28 Jul, 2007 09:59 am
@Pinochet73,
Pinochet73;27989 wrote:
Bastard Geraldo Rivera defended Vick lastnight on Billow O'Reilly, claiming animals are not people. Lock that scumbag up.
Quote:
animals are not people.
Technically he's is right, LOL.
Pinochet73
 
  1  
Reply Sat 28 Jul, 2007 10:37 am
@Drnaline,
Drnaline;28086 wrote:
Technically he's is right, LOL.


Point is he's trying to get Vick off the hook. The thought of a successful Black man being toppled by his own vices is horrific to some. They'd sacrifice all decency to prop him up. It's reverse racism at its worst. :thumbdown:
0 Replies
 
Pinochet73
 
  1  
Reply Sat 28 Jul, 2007 10:44 am
@rugonnacry,
rugonnacry;28079 wrote:
Ummm FTR Dogs ARENT people.


People who are cruel to helpless animals are some of the most sick of the sick. They're one step away from child-molestors. Consider the mentality of someone who would torture and execute DOGS, as a hobby. That's one sick MF, who at a minimum should receive public scorn. No way. Vick will never be anything but a sick bastard to me, and any team that hires him I will never watch. The only way Vick could ever redeem himself in my eyes would be if he confessed publicly, asked for forgiveness, took a long, long course of therapy, and dedicated a massive part of his life and fortune to the Humane Society of America. By pleading not guilty, he's only dug his grave deeper. He sucks. He's a cruel, demented savage. :no:
Pinochet73
 
  1  
Reply Sat 28 Jul, 2007 01:34 pm
@socalgolfguy,
Clinton defenses available to Vick:

"Why should I be punished, when everyone else in the NFL has done the same thing, but just didn't get caught?"

"What I do in my private life is my business."

"I didn't agree to not fight, torture and kill dogs when I became the Falcons' QB."

"Well.....that depends on what the definition of animal cruelty is."

"I shouldn't have to tell the truth regarding matters in my private life, such as breaking the law or practicing sadism toward animals."

"Why is this such a big deal, as long the economy is strong?"

"Every time a Democrat from among the masses succeeds, Right-wing conspiracies wanna tear him apart."

"Screw with me, and my Number One wench will run for President and hose-over everybody!!"
0 Replies
 
rugonnacry
 
  1  
Reply Sat 28 Jul, 2007 04:25 pm
@Pinochet73,
Pinochet73;28113 wrote:
People who are cruel to helpless animals are some of the most sick of the sick. They're one step away from child-molestors. Consider the mentality of someone who would torture and execute DOGS, as a hobby. That's one sick MF, who at a minimum should receive public scorn. No way. Vick will never be anything but a sick bastard to me, and any team that hires him I will never watch. The only way Vick could ever redeem himself in my eyes would be if he confessed publicly, asked for forgiveness, took a long, long course of therapy, and dedicated a massive part of his life and fortune to the Humane Society of America. By pleading not guilty, he's only dug his grave deeper. He sucks. He's a cruel, demented savage. :no:[/QUOTE

I was not advocating what he did. I simply agreed with a SINGLE statement DOGS ARE NOT PEOPLE.

To see animal abuse is even on the same level as child molesting, or even a DISTANT second was just (insert personal attack here) It is not okay to be cruel and inhumane to animals.

But that crime should be NOWHERE on the list with say, Murder, Child Molesting. Hell even TAX efvasion should be held with more merit that animal cruelty... Why Tax evasion. Because generally only rich people who own thousands of dollars those thousands of dollars would hire another police man that could be there on the streets pulling that illegal immigrant over for a busted tail light and thus deporting him.
rugonnacry
 
  1  
Reply Sat 28 Jul, 2007 04:26 pm
@socalgolfguy,
socalgolfguy;28083 wrote:
Are you saying that because they are not human that they should not be protected under the law against cruel and inhumane torture by a bunch of under educated morons..?


Yeah t is what I am saying... See prvious post by ME to see my views.
0 Replies
 
Pinochet73
 
  1  
Reply Sat 28 Jul, 2007 08:13 pm
@rugonnacry,
rugonnacry;28225 wrote:
Pinochet73;28113 wrote:
People who are cruel to helpless animals are some of the most sick of the sick. They're one step away from child-molestors. Consider the mentality of someone who would torture and execute DOGS, as a hobby. That's one sick MF, who at a minimum should receive public scorn. No way. Vick will never be anything but a sick bastard to me, and any team that hires him I will never watch. The only way Vick could ever redeem himself in my eyes would be if he confessed publicly, asked for forgiveness, took a long, long course of therapy, and dedicated a massive part of his life and fortune to the Humane Society of America. By pleading not guilty, he's only dug his grave deeper. He sucks. He's a cruel, demented savage. :no:[/QUOTE

I was not advocating what he did. I simply agreed with a SINGLE statement DOGS ARE NOT PEOPLE.

To see animal abuse is even on the same level as child molesting, or even a DISTANT second was just (insert personal attack here) It is not okay to be cruel and inhumane to animals.

But that crime should be NOWHERE on the list with say, Murder, Child Molesting. Hell even TAX efvasion should be held with more merit that animal cruelty... Why Tax evasion. Because generally only rich people who own thousands of dollars those thousands of dollars would hire another police man that could be there on the streets pulling that illegal immigrant over for a busted tail light and thus deporting him.[/QUOTE]

It's the same mentality -- total hatred for life. It's the same thing. Anyone who can torture animals can very easily torture humans. The thought-process is the same. It hinges on cruelty toward the helpless.
rugonnacry
 
  1  
Reply Sat 28 Jul, 2007 11:05 pm
@Pinochet73,
Pinochet73;28255 wrote:
rugonnacry;28225 wrote:


It's the same mentality -- total hatred for life. It's the same thing. Anyone who can torture animals can very easily torture humans. The thought-process is the same. It hinges on cruelty toward the helpless.


NO ONE is convicted of a mentality. so again Animal abuse DOES NOT belong in the same mention as child molestation.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

 
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 04/30/2025 at 11:49:14