1
   

Islamic Europe

 
 
Drnaline
 
  1  
Reply Sun 26 Aug, 2007 09:23 am
@scooby-doo cv,
scooby-doo;32841 wrote:
your kidding lol here am i on this forum,thinking that scotland and i decide US foreign policy :dunno: lol
Yeah, seems scots have a real afliction for meddling, LOL.
scooby-doo cv
 
  1  
Reply Sun 26 Aug, 2007 09:58 am
@Drnaline,
Drnaline;32843 wrote:
Yeah, seems scots have a real afliction for meddling, LOL.


i give an opinion :thumbup: i dont meddle !
0 Replies
 
Drnaline
 
  1  
Reply Sun 26 Aug, 2007 10:24 am
@Pinochet73,
Oh that's right, just us americans meddle, LOL.
scooby-doo cv
 
  1  
Reply Sun 26 Aug, 2007 10:44 am
@Drnaline,
Drnaline;32863 wrote:
Oh that's right, just us americans meddle, LOL.


yes the US government has a history of meddling in foreign country's ! latin-america is full of them,the middle-east,when it suits them !
Reagaknight
 
  1  
Reply Sun 26 Aug, 2007 10:48 am
@Pinochet73,
How about your country, eh, scoob? What business did your ancestors, or at least people from Scotland a long time ago, your ancestors were prabably hiding from the English, have stopping the English from taking over your land? Meddling if I ever saw it.
scooby-doo cv
 
  1  
Reply Sun 26 Aug, 2007 10:52 am
@Reagaknight,
Reagaknight;32874 wrote:
How about your country, eh, scoob? What business did your ancestors, or at least people from Scotland a long time ago, your ancestors were prabably hiding from the English, have stopping the English from taking over your land? Meddling if I ever saw it.


lol is that your best effort lol
0 Replies
 
Reagaknight
 
  1  
Reply Sun 26 Aug, 2007 10:53 am
@Pinochet73,
Okay, why'd you sack York or whatever you sacked, huh?
0 Replies
 
Red cv
 
  1  
Reply Sun 26 Aug, 2007 10:55 am
@Drnaline,
Here Scooby is an article that explains the Islamification of England visa vie Sharia Law: England: One Law for Muslims, one for the Rest - Warner Todd Huston - Feb 03, 07

Article:England: One Law for Muslims, one for the Rest
By Warner Todd Huston (02/03/07)

England is fast becoming but simple a plot of land floating in the sea instead of a nation of culture guided by a rich legal tradition. It is a tail of warning for the USA, the moral of which is don't allow minorities to set up a parallel culture or you will cease to be a nation of laws. You will, in fact, cease to be a nation at all.

England is on the verge of having a bifurcated legal system, one for their various religious peoples and one for the rest of the native population. Two recent stories show the degradation of the British legal system and the inequities that it creates.

In a BBC story by Innes Bowen, The end of one law for all?, the question is asked: "Ethnic and religious courts are gaining ground in the UK. Will this lead to different justice for different people?"

How could this be that hard to answer?

Naturally, the BBC strives to make it seem as if all is right and good with this destruction of the English legal system because, after all, these people are just doing what "their culture" requires that they do, neatly ignoring the fact that they are in England and NOT back in their own homeland.



Aydarus Yusuf has lived in the UK for the past 15 years, but he feels more bound by the traditional law of his country of birth - Somalia - than he does by the law of England and Wales.

"Us Somalis, wherever we are in the world, we have our own law. It's not Islamic, it's not religious - it's just a cultural thing."



Well, isn't that nice?



A number of parallel legal universes have been quietly evolving among minority communities. As well as Somali customary law, Islamic and Jewish laws are being applied and enforced in parts of the UK.



Worse still...



While religious leaders in the UK's Jewish and Muslim communities have not sought to enforce their own versions of criminal law, they have steadily built up their capacity to deal with civil matters within their own religious codes. What's more, they are doing it with the help of English law.

Crucially, the legislation does not insist that settlements must be based on English law; all that matters is the outcome is reasonable and both parties agree to the process. And it's in this space that religious courts, applying the laws of another culture, are growing in the UK.

Naturally, the BBC spends 90% of the piece saying how benign this bifurcation of the courts is and that Muslims wouldn't wish to push their extreme Sharia laws for criminal matters in the UK. "That simply would never be acceptable", they quote former judge Gerald Butler as saying... as if just saying it assures us all that these extremists wouldn't push for it anyway.

Remember "There will be peace in our time", England?

After all, to use a supposed Middle Eastern expression, once they get a nose under the tent it won't take much to push on through. Once Sharia is accepted even in its lesser forms, Muslims will have every reason to expect that they can expand that usage of their own "courts" and to ignore the rightfully applicable English laws on any given subject.

In fact, the BBC seems in love with the idea of these wonderful religious "courts" supplanting their own. The Beeb barely gives us a word against the idea save one luke-warm warning by "Cassandra Balchin, a convert to Islam and spokeswoman for the group Women Living Under Muslim Laws" who is apparently "concerned".



"Very often traditional forms of mediation can disadvantage vulnerable groups, such as women, within a community."



Very often, Mz. Balchin?

Like most western news sources, the BBC seems completely ignorant of the abuse women and minorities suffer under Sharia laws the world over. Women are beaten, raped, murdered, mutilated and oppressed by Muslim "culture" and English law should never turn its back on these vulnerable members of their society. this would be a travesty and a direct refutation of western morals that posit that all people are created equal and stand the same in the eyes of the law.After this rather benign BBC report on England's dying legal system, the Telegraph published their report on Sharia invading England's shores and they take a little more umbrage at the possibility of immigrant communities circumventing English law.

Sharia law is spreading as authority wanes



Islamic sharia law is gaining an increasing foothold in parts of Britain, a report claims.

However, the BBC Radio 4 programme Law in Action produced evidence yesterday that it was being used by some Muslims as an alternative to English criminal law. Aydarus Yusuf, 29, a youth worker from Somalia, recalled a stabbing case that was decided by an unofficial Somali "court" sitting in Woolwich, south-east London.



In any case, this is a sure sign that England is giving up on their own way of life and allowing just anyone to bring in just any kind of "legal" system they please merely because they are "culturally used" to it!

It makes one wonder why they fought so hard to prevent the American Colonists from leaving the Empire? The Americans were at least on another continent, after all, and not trying to change what was going on right in the Motherland itself!


The Islamafication of British Schools: Family Security Matters

Europe or Eurabia in fifty years you decide Scooby:Family Security Matters
scooby-doo cv
 
  1  
Reply Sun 26 Aug, 2007 11:02 am
@Drnaline,
lets get to the point here ! are you saying the UK and germany practise sharia law ! and do you still think hitler was a socialist lol
Pinochet73
 
  1  
Reply Sun 26 Aug, 2007 02:31 pm
@scooby-doo cv,
scooby-doo;32842 wrote:
pmsl brilliant stuff pino Very Happy


This is your brain on pavement:

BOOM, BLOP, BLOP, BOOM.........WOOP, WOOP, WOOP.......SPLAT.

In other words, just before your lights go out, after your head has been chopped off, you'll hear and feel the sensation of something like this, as your head hits the ground, bounces, hits it again, rolls and bumps into something, stopping the motion.
0 Replies
 
Red cv
 
  1  
Reply Sun 26 Aug, 2007 03:15 pm
@scooby-doo cv,
scooby-doo;32882 wrote:
lets get to the point here ! are you saying the UK and germany practise sharia law ! and do you still think hitler was a socialist lol



Yes Hitler was a socialist, common knowledge (to those with an education over grade five) and a matter of public record. He became a communist when he had the people (or sheeple) programed into believing his socialist horseshit and tripe. Yes Sharia Law is legal in England, Germany no but the judges feel if a women chooses to live in a Muslim relationship then she is subjected to Sharia law and culture.

Scooby can you read at all, or is reading comprehension a problem for you.
Pinochet73
 
  1  
Reply Sun 26 Aug, 2007 06:10 pm
@Red cv,
Red;32937 wrote:
Yes Hitler was a socialist, common knowledge (to those with an education over grade five) and a matter of public record. He became a communist when he had the people (or sheeple) programed into believing his socialist horse**** and tripe. Yes Sharia Law is legal in England, Germany no but the judges feel if a women chooses to live in a Muslim relationship then she is subjected to Sharia law and culture.

Scooby can you read at all, or is reading comprehension a problem for you.


Nah.....Hitler was the consummate Fascist warlord and conqueror. He coopted socialist labels to be more appealing to a wider slice of German society. But no.....he loathed Marx, the USSR, and everything Communism stood for. He considered Marxism to be a 'Jewish trick' played on European Man. That's why, in part, the Nazis were so brutal toward the Russians.
0 Replies
 
Drnaline
 
  1  
Reply Sun 26 Aug, 2007 06:21 pm
@scooby-doo cv,
scooby-doo;32873 wrote:
yes the US government has a history of meddling in foreign country's ! latin-america is full of them,the middle-east,when it suits them !


Your a sucker, you fall for those everytime, LOL. I like it when you make yourself look foolish.
scooby-doo cv
 
  1  
Reply Mon 27 Aug, 2007 09:01 am
@Drnaline,
Drnaline;32953 wrote:
Your a sucker, you fall for those everytime, LOL. I like it when you make yourself look foolish.


fall for what lol where is your point exactly ?
0 Replies
 
Drnaline
 
  1  
Reply Mon 27 Aug, 2007 09:03 am
@Pinochet73,
Us americans meddle but you don't, LOL!!!
scooby-doo cv
 
  1  
Reply Mon 27 Aug, 2007 09:06 am
@Red cv,
Red;32937 wrote:
Yes Hitler was a socialist, common knowledge (to those with an education over grade five) and a matter of public record. He became a communist when he had the people (or sheeple) programed into believing his socialist horse**** and tripe. Yes Sharia Law is legal in England, Germany no but the judges feel if a women chooses to live in a Muslim relationship then she is subjected to Sharia law and culture.

Scooby can you read at all, or is reading comprehension a problem for you.


so your still saying hitler was a socialist lol and sharia law is legal in england lol ( a grade five education) lol im pissing myself laughing at this lol Very Happy you don't have a clue Very Happy lol
0 Replies
 
scooby-doo cv
 
  1  
Reply Mon 27 Aug, 2007 09:08 am
@Drnaline,
Drnaline;33029 wrote:
Us americans meddle but you don't, LOL!!!


your country meddles in other country's affairs :thumbup: i give my opinion on a political forum lol can you not see a difference lol just a slight difference even lol:D
0 Replies
 
scooby-doo cv
 
  1  
Reply Mon 27 Aug, 2007 09:10 am
@Red cv,
Red;32937 wrote:
Yes Hitler was a socialist, common knowledge (to those with an education over grade five) and a matter of public record. He became a communist when he had the people (or sheeple) programed into believing his socialist horse**** and tripe. Yes Sharia Law is legal in England, Germany no but the judges feel if a women chooses to live in a Muslim relationship then she is subjected to Sharia law and culture.

Scooby can you read at all, or is reading comprehension a problem for you.


come on red lol i loved that so much i had to reply again pmsl
0 Replies
 
Drnaline
 
  1  
Reply Mon 27 Aug, 2007 09:11 am
@Pinochet73,
I see no difference. That's like asking me to believe if you were in office in your country your opinion would change. I don't think it would. So being your from Scotland and in an American forum you don't think you are meddling in American affairs, LOL. The irony runs rampant.
scooby-doo cv
 
  1  
Reply Mon 27 Aug, 2007 09:14 am
@Drnaline,
Drnaline;33036 wrote:
I see no difference. That's like asking me to believe if you were in office in your country your opinion would change. I don't think it would. So being your from Scotland and in an American forum you don't think you are meddling in American affairs, LOL. The irony runs rampant.


you can't see a difference lol foe example the US backing a coup to overthrow a democratically elected head of state,to someone like me who post's my opinion's on a forum ! ok :wtf:
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
  1. Forums
  2. » Islamic Europe
  3. » Page 5
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 05/11/2024 at 02:06:48