@mik60487,
mik60487;8052 wrote:Kindly explain the relevance of discussing collateral damage to either Canada
or Mexico in the contect of the debacle in the Middle East. The Brave New World envisioned by the Neocons was not to be because it was then and is now a PIPE DREAM! The affair has severly damaged American interest. To imagine any thing else in the way of an out come is not plausable. Incidentally just how did Clinton enter the discussion after all his AG prosecuted and imprisoned the Blind Cleric responsible for the bombing of the
Towers has the current group claim as much.
Quote:Kindly explain the relevance of discussing collateral damage to either Canada
or Mexico in the contect of the debacle in the Middle East.
Why? The context i was using them was as if they were attacked with a nuke.
Quote:The Brave New World envisioned by the Neocons was not to be because it was then and is now a PIPE DREAM!
I think you'd better stop hitting the pipe.
Quote:
The affair has severly damaged American interest.
In your opinion.
Quote:To imagine any thing else in the way of an out come is not plausable.
I'll leave that up to the Iraqi's to decide. If terror is what they want, terror is what they will get.
Quote:Incidentally just how did Clinton enter the discussion after all his AG prosecuted and imprisoned the Blind Cleric responsible for the bombing of the
Towers has the current group claim as much
Didn't you read the posts. I entered Clinton. That is how.