1
   

U.S. Seeks Silence on CIA Prisons

 
 
Brent cv
 
  1  
Reply Mon 6 Nov, 2006 09:20 pm
@oleo,
oleo;6463 wrote:
Brent, we're not being nice and playing by the rules. We're torturing thousands
of people, picked up on tips, and obviously the information we're getting
isn't preventing our soldiers from being killed or turning much around in
Iraq, or anyplace else.

Please tell me you understand that...

What I understand is our military is facing an enemy that fights like cowards. They have no uniform distinguishing themselves from civilians, they attack US forces in heavily populated areas basically begging the US to return fire in order to kill their own people.

What I understand is they are beheading our military and civilian workers.

When the enemy abides by the Geneva Convention we will. That is how I see it.

The difference between us and the enemy is our soliders are not targeting the civilians. They are not torturing the nice old lady down the road for information. US troops are not positioning themselves so that enemy fire will obtain civilian casualties. When they drop bombs they take every action possible to reduce civilian deaths.

That is enough for me to sleep at night knowing we are better than the enemy.

If you think torturing people puts us on the same field as the people we fight then I don't know what to tell you other than you are wrong and horribly misguided.

Instead of Muslims in Iraq standing up and fighting for their own rights and fighting to regain control from their country and to keep tyrants out of office that threaten world stability they instead sit back and do nothing. Then it is left up to the United States to step in and stop radical governments from becoming to powerful.

Oh but yea.. it's all the United States fault because we have a few pictures of people put in less than ideal situations.... yet they are still alive.
Sherman cv
 
  1  
Reply Mon 6 Nov, 2006 10:14 pm
@Brent cv,
Brent;6480 wrote:
What I understand is our military is facing an enemy that fights like cowards. They have no uniform distinguishing themselves from civilians, they attack US forces in heavily populated areas basically begging the US to return fire in order to kill their own people.

What I understand is they are beheading our military and civilian workers.

When the enemy abides by the Geneva Convention we will. That is how I see it.

The difference between us and the enemy is our soliders are not targeting the civilians. They are not torturing the nice old lady down the road for information. US troops are not positioning themselves so that enemy fire will obtain civilian casualties. When they drop bombs they take every action possible to reduce civilian deaths.

That is enough for me to sleep at night knowing we are better than the enemy.

If you think torturing people puts us on the same field as the people we fight then I don't know what to tell you other than you are wrong and horribly misguided.

Instead of Muslims in Iraq standing up and fighting for their own rights and fighting to regain control from their country and to keep tyrants out of office that threaten world stability they instead sit back and do nothing. Then it is left up to the United States to step in and stop radical governments from becoming to powerful.

Oh but yea.. it's all the United States fault because we have a few pictures of people put in less than ideal situations.... yet they are still alive.


Thanks Brent..I was just so tired to feel all alone with DRNeline...those m......r f...rs are trying to depict the american troupes as vicious criminals!!!

Sometimes i would like to be there too...

Let me tell you something, you got not just enemies over there, but you have a huge opposition here in UK.. British really stinks...They do not understand the gravity of the situation..What this fight is all about...They have hanged poster saying free palestine and adressing Bush as terrotist n 1...I hate that.. But what do you expect fron a country being taken over by Muslim population???

The BBC is very irresponsable, their interviews are twisted and unclear, their position is unrealistic and dangerous...They treat US as enemy...I feel very ashamed of their attitude....I was shocked when i witness an interview with John Bellinger, i could not believe the kind of people UK is made made of?:no:

John Bellinger was perfect, i did not let go one bit...Proud of him!!!:headbang:
0 Replies
 
Drnaline
 
  1  
Reply Mon 6 Nov, 2006 10:17 pm
@tumbleweed cv,
Thought** for the day**
In case we find ourselves starting to believe all
the anti-American sentiment and negativity, we should
remember England 's Prime Minister Tony Blair's words during a recent
interview. When asked by one of his Parliament members why he
believes so much in America , he said:
"A simple way to take measure of a country is to look at
how many want in ... And how many want out."
Only two defining forces have ever offered to die for you:
1. Jesus Christ
2. The American G. I.
One died for your soul, the other for your freedom.
0 Replies
 
Drnaline
 
  1  
Reply Mon 6 Nov, 2006 10:24 pm
@tumbleweed cv,
Quote:
I was just so tired to feel all alone with DRNeline...those m......r f...rs are trying to depict the american troupes as vicious criminals!!!

Your never alone Sherm. aDReNALINE says so. Best thing i could say to you Sherm is "Welcome to the good fight"
Curmudgeon
 
  1  
Reply Mon 6 Nov, 2006 10:36 pm
@Drnaline,
"A simple way to take measure of a country is to look at
how many want in ... And how many want out."
Only two defining forces have ever offered to die for you:
1. Jesus Christ
2. The American G. I.
One died for your soul, the other for your freedom.

Drnaline - if that quote is accurate , I want to "borrow" it . Can you provide a link to when and where Blair said it ?
Did he add the last three lines , or did you ?
Drnaline
 
  1  
Reply Mon 6 Nov, 2006 10:39 pm
@Curmudgeon,
Curmudgeon;6485 wrote:
"A simple way to take measure of a country is to look at
how many want in ... And how many want out."
Only two defining forces have ever offered to die for you:
1. Jesus Christ
2. The American G. I.
One died for your soul, the other for your freedom.

Drnaline - if that quote is accurate , I want to "borrow" it . Can you provide a link to when and where Blair said it ?
Did he add the last three lines , or did you ?
I posted it verbatim as i got it. In an email. I'll try and get a link.
Brent cv
 
  1  
Reply Mon 6 Nov, 2006 11:00 pm
@Drnaline,
Drnaline;6486 wrote:
I posted it verbatim as i got it. In an email. I'll try and get a link.

Urban Legends Reference Pages: Tony Blair Quote

Never believe anything you get in an email.
Curmudgeon
 
  1  
Reply Mon 6 Nov, 2006 11:55 pm
@Brent cv,
Exactly why I asked about it . The sentiment is there , just isn't all Blair's . The statement is valid , but the added comments threw me off . Not sure Blair is one to use those terms . He might be Church of England and I am not familiar with that . They may not follow the "saviour" role of Jesus . I didn't want to attribute it wrongly .
Snopes to the rescue , again . Thanks Brent .
0 Replies
 
Drnaline
 
  1  
Reply Tue 7 Nov, 2006 07:55 am
@tumbleweed cv,
Thanks Brent.
tumbleweed cv
 
  1  
Reply Tue 7 Nov, 2006 08:59 am
@Drnaline,
http://action.aclu.org/torturefoia/released/102405/

Torture was indicated in a few of these cases.Very Happy

Quick facts.Human Rights First | Us Law & Security | Torture: Quick Facts
Brent cv
 
  1  
Reply Tue 7 Nov, 2006 11:15 am
@tumbleweed cv,
tumbleweed;6491 wrote:

I still stand by my post above
tumbleweed cv
 
  1  
Reply Tue 7 Nov, 2006 04:04 pm
@Brent cv,
I wonder if we lead by example? Didn't we train some of these guys?


NY Times Advertisement

"Last year, investigators discovered evidence of abuse and torture at two other detention centers run by the Interior Ministry, but the Iraqi government has not announced any indictments in connection with those cases"

They can't even police themselves at this point. I dont see how they will ever police the country. They don't have the quality of recruits it takes for a civil war, but we broke so I guess we fix it.

"The Leahy Law, named for its author, Senator Patrick Leahy, Democrat of Vermont, requires that assistance to foreign military and police forces stop if the secretary of state has ''credible evidence'' implicating them in human rights abuses -- unless effective measures are taken to bring offenders to justice. The law covers money in the foreign operations budget and Defense Department training programs."

All is fair in laws and war. We make laws so we can break most of them in the name of democracy. What country wouldn't embrace a system like that?:wootSMILEY:


What would the Secretary consider " credible evidence" :scratchchin:
Oh, I forgot, they have their own definition for human rights violations. :banghead:

Stay the course.:drive: :patriot:
Brent cv
 
  1  
Reply Tue 7 Nov, 2006 04:17 pm
@tumbleweed cv,
Man you sure do care a lot about the enemy.

Or is it you just post anything that will make Bush look bad even if it means supporting the enemy?
tumbleweed cv
 
  1  
Reply Tue 7 Nov, 2006 05:04 pm
@Brent cv,
Brent;6501 wrote:
Man you sure do care a lot about the enemy.

Or is it you just post anything that will make Bush look bad even if it means supporting the enemy?


It doesn't have anything to do with supporting the enemy.

Who is the enemy to the people of Iraq if the country is getting worse instead of better?

The conditions we see in Iraq is the result of poor implimentation of policies that result from " staying the course" That is a Republican policy. Liberals didn't make that one up.

Maybe you know of an example where we have had a policy change from the White House. I can't find one.

The police force we helped put in place is part of the problem instead of the solution. Now we have to police the police.That makes our mission even harder.

How do I support the enemy? All I did was post examples of torture.
0 Replies
 
Sherman cv
 
  1  
Reply Tue 7 Nov, 2006 09:53 pm
@tumbleweed cv,
tumbleweed;6499 wrote:
I wonder if we lead by example? Didn't we train some of these guys?


NY Times Advertisement

"Last year, investigators discovered evidence of abuse and torture at two other detention centers run by the Interior Ministry, but the Iraqi government has not announced any indictments in connection with those cases"

They can't even police themselves at this point. I dont see how they will ever police the country. They don't have the quality of recruits it takes for a civil war, but we broke so I guess we fix it.

"The Leahy Law, named for its author, Senator Patrick Leahy, Democrat of Vermont, requires that assistance to foreign military and police forces stop if the secretary of state has ''credible evidence'' implicating them in human rights abuses -- unless effective measures are taken to bring offenders to justice. The law covers money in the foreign operations budget and Defense Department training programs."

All is fair in laws and war. We make laws so we can break most of them in the name of democracy. What country wouldn't embrace a system like that?:wootSMILEY:


What would the Secretary consider " credible evidence" :scratchchin:
Oh, I forgot, they have their own definition for human rights violations. :banghead:

Stay the course.:drive: :patriot:



You just don't give up, do ya? My God!!! What's wrong with you???
If are you so concerned, would like to go there and help them out, to kill our soldiers?? It seems it would make you feel better!!!!:frown:

Human Right are hideous!!:eek: ..They always back up criminals and terrorists, by trying to make their lives better....I wonder who heck is scared anymore to commit mass murder, rape, fraud, etc.. Nobody because HR are there to protect them and look after their miserable stinky disgusting lives...:no:
Sherman cv
 
  1  
Reply Tue 7 Nov, 2006 09:55 pm
@Drnaline,
Drnaline;6484 wrote:
Your never alone Sherm. aDReNALINE says so. Best thing i could say to you Sherm is "Welcome to the good fight"


God bless you brother!!!:headbang:

Thanks Brent for the site on Blair quote....:p
Curmudgeon
 
  1  
Reply Tue 7 Nov, 2006 10:12 pm
@Sherman cv,
Tumbleweed , please read this article . It is quite long , but worth the time , I think .
The only issue this election
The Only Issue This Election Day
By Orson Scott Card

"There is only one issue in this election that will matter five or ten years from now, and that's the War on Terror.

And the success of the War on Terror now teeters on the fulcrum of this election.

If control of the House passes into Democratic hands, there are enough withdraw-on-a-timetable Democrats in positions of prominence that it will not only seem to be a victory for our enemies, it will be one.

Unfortunately, the opposite is not the case -- if the Republican Party remains in control of both houses of Congress there is no guarantee that the outcome of the present war will be favorable for us or anyone else. "


Found in realclearpolitics.com
tumbleweed cv
 
  1  
Reply Tue 7 Nov, 2006 10:31 pm
@Sherman cv,
Sherman;6510 wrote:
You just don't give up, do ya? My God!!! What's wrong with you???
If are you so concerned, would like to go there and help them out, to kill our soldiers?? It seems it would make you feel better!!!!:frown:

Human Right are hideous!!:eek: ..They always back up criminals and terrorists, by trying to make their lives better....I wonder who heck is scared anymore to commit mass murder, rape, fraud, etc.. Nobody because HR are there to protect them and look after their miserable stinky disgusting lives...:no:


Which side of the ocean are you on?Very Happy
0 Replies
 
tumbleweed cv
 
  1  
Reply Tue 7 Nov, 2006 10:59 pm
@Curmudgeon,
Curmudgeon;6512 wrote:
Tumbleweed , please read this article . It is quite long , but worth the time , I think .
The only issue this election
The Only Issue This Election Day
By Orson Scott Card

"There is only one issue in this election that will matter five or ten years from now, and that's the War on Terror.

And the success of the War on Terror now teeters on the fulcrum of this election.

If control of the House passes into Democratic hands, there are enough withdraw-on-a-timetable Democrats in positions of prominence that it will not only seem to be a victory for our enemies, it will be one.

Unfortunately, the opposite is not the case -- if the Republican Party remains in control of both houses of Congress there is no guarantee that the outcome of the present war will be favorable for us or anyone else. "


Found in realclearpolitics.com


This seems to be a " what if the Democrats win" artical .
I've heard a lot about what might happen but it hasn't happened yet.

It looks like the Democrats are going to take the house so we are about to find out about who did what in regards to the war. The voters want out of this war. How that happens has yet to be seen.

The Republicans just got a wake up call. Contrary to Republican wishes, voters want out of Iraq, and they voted for change, neither of which they got from the Republicans.

Bush blew it and He hurt his party at the same time. Voters don't want to stay the course like Republicans. Cut and run is your parties version of withdrawl .

Time will tell if this artical holds true.

I think we made a mistake by not putting enough troops in Iraq in the first place. What timetable have the Democrats endorsed?
0 Replies
 
oleo
 
  1  
Reply Wed 8 Nov, 2006 06:43 pm
@Brent cv,
Brent;6480 wrote:
What I understand is our military is facing an enemy that fights like cowards. They have no uniform distinguishing themselves from civilians, they attack US forces in heavily populated areas basically begging the US to return fire in order to kill their own people.

What I understand is they are beheading our military and civilian workers.

When the enemy abides by the Geneva Convention we will. That is how I see it.

The difference between us and the enemy is our soliders are not targeting the civilians. They are not torturing the nice old lady down the road for information. US troops are not positioning themselves so that enemy fire will obtain civilian casualties. When they drop bombs they take every action possible to reduce civilian deaths.

That is enough for me to sleep at night knowing we are better than the enemy.

If you think torturing people puts us on the same field as the people we fight then I don't know what to tell you other than you are wrong and horribly misguided.

Instead of Muslims in Iraq standing up and fighting for their own rights and fighting to regain control from their country and to keep tyrants out of office that threaten world stability they instead sit back and do nothing. Then it is left up to the United States to step in and stop radical governments from becoming to powerful.

Oh but yea.. it's all the United States fault because we have a few pictures of people put in less than ideal situations.... yet they are still alive.


For the last part, Brent, they did rise up when we told them to, during the
first Gulf War... and we left them to be slaughtered by Saddam.

Don't try to push the unpatriotic thing onto me. I'm realistically looking at
the situation.

War is hell. Once you've asked someone to unleash the most awful parts
of human nature from himself onto an enemy it's hard to expect him to
selectively focus it. That's why you don't wage war within a civilian population.

Besides which, you still miss the point that we didn't have to go to war with
Iraq. They were not an immediate threat. Our enemy... our immediate enemy
who attacked us was Al Qaeda, based in Afghanistan.
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 01/13/2025 at 10:53:57