4
   

Did Man Set Foot On The Moon In The 60s, 70,s Or Ever?

 
 
Intrepid
 
  1  
Wed 7 Jul, 2010 04:25 pm
@BillRM,
There have been other hoaxes that were not discovered for over 40 years. This one for example.

Piltdown man is one of the most famous frauds in the history of science. In 1912 Charles Dawson discovered the first of two skulls found in the Piltdown quarry in Sussex, England, skulls of an apparently primitive hominid, an ancestor of man. Piltdown man, or Eoanthropus dawsoni to use his scientific name, was a sensation. He was the expected "missing link" a mixture of human and ape with the noble brow of Homo sapiens and a primitive jaw. Best of all, he was British!

As the years went by and new finds of ancient hominids were made, Piltdown man became an anomaly that didn't fit in, a creature without a place in the human family tree. Finally, in 1953, the truth came out. Piltdown man was a hoax, the most ancient of people who never were.
DrewDad
 
  1  
Wed 7 Jul, 2010 04:35 pm
@Intrepid,
Yes, there have been hoaxes.

The existence of hoaxes, however, does not make the moon landings more likely to be a hoax.
0 Replies
 
BillRM
 
  1  
Wed 7 Jul, 2010 04:41 pm
@Intrepid,
You got to laugh a hoax that would by it nature need to involved tens of thousands and a hoax the involved one or two is not the same thing my silly friend.

Maybe two or even three people could keep such a secret for forty years not tens of thousands.

In world war 2 my mother knew where my father troop ship was going long before the captain open his seal orders as a high military gentleman told his wife who then share it with the women at the hair salon.
Intrepid
 
  1  
Wed 7 Jul, 2010 04:55 pm
@BillRM,
You may be an idiot, but I am not silly and I am not your friend.
Involved 1 or 2? Are you nuts?

Didn't your mother ever hear that loose lips sink ships?
parados
 
  1  
Wed 7 Jul, 2010 04:59 pm
@OCCOM BILL,
Your photo doesn't show me that NO particles are on the foot. It only shows me that nothing in the visible area of the foot is big enough to be easily picked up by the camera. Your photo doesn't even prove what you claim it proves. There is no visible dust but that doesn't mean that there is no dust or even that there should be dust.
0 Replies
 
BillRM
 
  1  
Wed 7 Jul, 2010 05:11 pm
@Intrepid,
And how many do you think was involved in the missing link hoax??????

In any case I can see it now a few of the 18 men of the flight crew told their wives not to worry as they was not going to be going to the moon for real and would be safe and sound at some secret film studio instead.

Five years pass and one of those men is no longer happily married and leave the wife for a newer model and the secret is out.

Hell son do not look at that silly TV show about the moon missions I was at a secret government film studio creating it. See that picture I build the damn set with my own hands.

Multiply that by the many many thousands that would need to be on the hoax and the secret would not have last for a year at the very best.



0 Replies
 
djjd62
 
  1  
Wed 7 Jul, 2010 05:20 pm
Did Man Set Foot On The Moon In The 60s, 70,s Or Ever?

the real question is, did we ever leave

i've heard more than one guest on Coast to Coast AM talk about the secret government and their bases on the moon, bases where they met with the aliens and and from which they are exploring ancient ruins
BillRM
 
  1  
Wed 7 Jul, 2010 05:22 pm
@djjd62,
Quote:
i've heard more than one guest on Coast to Coast AM talk about the secret government and their bases on the moon, bases where they met with the aliens and and from which they are exploring ancient ruins


Every bit as likely as a moon landing hoax.

By the way did not the Martian rock find come out because someone high in the government was trying to impress a call girl?
djjd62
 
  1  
Wed 7 Jul, 2010 05:27 pm
@BillRM,
yup, the sad fact about Coast to Coast, is they get somethings right, they were way ahead of the mainstream media on the bee disappearance and some other legitimate stories, and then they have the wacky (but highly entertaining) stuff that basically destroys their legitimacy
BillRM
 
  1  
Wed 7 Jul, 2010 09:33 pm
@djjd62,
Lot of craziness on the internet and it is a wonderful tools for the crazies no matter how few they are to find each other.

I can remember the UNIBOMBER fan newsgroup as an example of this where it was just full of people who back blowing others up in the name of his ideals.

I know that the 911 crazies and the holocaust crazies are more annoying from a moral position then the moon hoaxers crazies.

As a person who had grown up with the space program and drove eight hundreds miles two times as a teenager to see the moonships leaving earth however I personal hate the people who throw both logic and common sense out of the window to try to denial one of mankind to date greatest achievements.


Intrepid
 
  1  
Thu 8 Jul, 2010 05:21 am
@BillRM,
There have been much greater achievements.
rosborne979
 
  1  
Thu 8 Jul, 2010 06:43 am
@Intrepid,
Intrepid wrote:
There have been much greater achievements.

What did you have in mind?
0 Replies
 
BillRM
 
  1  
Thu 8 Jul, 2010 07:15 am
@Intrepid,
Quote:
There have been much greater achievements.


Yes what are those greater achievements then visiting another world for the first time in human history?

Looking forward to your list beginning I assume with fire.

Intrepid
 
  1  
Thu 8 Jul, 2010 07:23 am
@BillRM,
Crazies like you would not understand that achievements that benefit the human race are achievements worthwhile.

If they did land on the moon, what benefit was that to anybody?
DrewDad
 
  1  
Thu 8 Jul, 2010 07:25 am
@Intrepid,
Intrepid wrote:
If they did land on the moon, what benefit was that to anybody?
Well, it hides the fact that all of our new, crazy technology (the Internet, wireless stuff, electric cars, etc.) actually come from the spacecraft that crashed in Roswell.
Intrepid
 
  1  
Thu 8 Jul, 2010 07:27 am
@DrewDad,
Now, that I could believe
BillRM
 
  1  
Thu 8 Jul, 2010 07:43 am
@Intrepid,
The same benefit we got when we begin to spread over the whole planet from the small area we evolute from my silly friend.

This was the small beginning of our spreading out in the solar system and no longer being depended on one very fragile planet that have a history from time to time of killing 99 percent of all animal life on it.
BillRM
 
  1  
Thu 8 Jul, 2010 07:44 am
@Intrepid,
Quote:
Now, that I could believe


Without question you could believe such.
Intrepid
 
  2  
Thu 8 Jul, 2010 08:06 am
@BillRM,
There you go again. Trying to be all authoritative on things you know nothing about.
0 Replies
 
Intrepid
 
  2  
Thu 8 Jul, 2010 08:08 am
@BillRM,
BillRM wrote:

The same benefit we got when we begin to spread over the whole planet from the small area we evolute from my silly friend.

This was the small beginning of our spreading out in the solar system and no longer being depended on one very fragile planet that have a history from time to time of killing 99 percent of all animal life on it.


Where DO you get these wild and absurd facts?

And, can you ever respond to something without calling people silly, crazy, insane etc. Perhaps you should spend less time on that and more time in trying to form a cohesive sentence.
 

Related Topics

New Propulsion, the "EM Drive" - Question by TomTomBinks
The Science Thread - Discussion by Wilso
Why do people deny evolution? - Question by JimmyJ
Are we alone in the universe? - Discussion by Jpsy
Fake Science Journals - Discussion by rosborne979
Controvertial "Proof" of Multiverse! - Discussion by littlek
 
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.05 seconds on 02/01/2025 at 10:45:29