Time is it moving slower than it was in the young universe?

Alans saying events cause time, time does not cause events. When the last event occurs time will cease to exist.

Please could you tell me which is your answer.

Of course, but that is the nature of science.

That's your choice as a non-scientist. However it is a fact.

Maybe I will, but not in this thread. At the moment we are talking about science, not scepticism.

I find this an interesting question. Especially because we have been measuring the distance from the Earth to the moon and it is growing. So when did they decide it was 10 meters out of place?

What you mean is an explenation, you actually got an answer.

Lol? ..gas planets? Gas planets and magnus effect acts differently than solid planets

No, that's a theory, a theory is not a fact.

Aha? I never remember any experiment proving that, sure in the physic classes we made retard experiments suggesting gravity but there Iirc hasn't been done any actual serious experiments proving it beyond reasonable doubt.

I hope you will have pity on me and do it, out of a good heart.

Honestly I don't know, it as TV doc, notorisly unrelyable and inaccurate, however I think it's due to the rising water lvls, also increase in imbalance of earh rotation due to water damns, big cities ..etc.

hmmm..interesting explain.

I asked you to explain the magnus effect with reference to Venus and Uranus. You 'answered' with this:-

I pointed out that Venus was not a gas planet. So now could you answer the question, or if you like 'explain', how the magnus effect works with reference to Venus and Uranus.

I agreed with your point, and then qualified it with my statement. So what does "No", have to do with any of those responses?

Are you contesting that scientists do not use mathematics to describe the effect of dark matter? I think you are tying yourself into knots.

I don't believe that has much to do with it. Please could you post the actual article explaining that the moon and the Earth are 10 metres 'out', and then I can read it. Maybe then it will be clearer.

Yes, and even that I answerd, which you have ignored.

So you have no scientific disproof? Well anyways, my thesis is not backed up by scientific proof, but merely a theory.

Fine then you explain to me.

Currently astronomers claims the moon of the earth are 10 meters out of place, explain that, I explain it with magnus effect, but that's just me

I did infact answer your question, maybe not satisfyingly.

Lol? ..gas planets? Gas planets and magnus effect acts differently than solid planets.

?

Math is math and only really relates to theory, facts are facts and rely on irrefudeble evidence which math alone can't provide. Too often we have had theories about this and that about planets and moons, when NASA actually send a prope up to a planet/moon usually we were proved wrong.

Dude all the time you plague me with your poor preception of things, I just wrote it was a TV doc, how can I link to that? ..besides you linked to a bad site with root kits.

Uplifter seems you are just a clever troll being a pain in the ass, I'll put you on ignore.

Well that's rich. I offer to help you understand something, to which you suggest I am a troll.

I have already received PM's from others on this forum telling me about your antics. I decided to give you the benefit of the doubt. My loss it seems.

Please put me on ignore. Hopefully then you won't accidentally learn anything about a subject you clearly know nothing about.

Consider yourself initiated and grateful. I at least was grateful for your education. Thanks xris.

Im not sure what you require. Time does not occur without activity. Space does not exist without events. No event , no space , no time.

The OP is an interesting argument. I've been thinking about it all day. I was wondering how you could qualify that time has slowed down with the expansion of the universe.

We can tell that things further away from us are accelerating faster because of the increased redshift we see in the light emitted from those objects.
What puzzles me is that the light that reaches our equipment has travelled for billions of years....from the past. So would that redshifted light be travelling faster towards us?

How time flowed in the early universe in the infinite gravity of the singularity defies both physics and logic, because due to Einstein it should have stood still

Time as the distance between events would not be something that can be measured in terms of speed by definition. Imagine, if you will if time, as a whole, sped up within a 'box' or 'frame'. It would not be noticeable from within the frame since the fundamental particles would have sped up in their paths and interactions, and all things constituent of them will have adjusted their processes accordingly. Time can only 'speed up' relative to something; that is, what you mean by time 'speeding up' in a segment of space is just a confusing (or confused ) way of stating that all of the processes in that segment of space increase speed -relative to something, as otherwise it would not be detectable- in a uniform manner.

I think that thinking of it as time 'speeding up' is somewhat ambiguous and confusing.

Now, I think you would do best for yourself by learning about brane cosmology. I know I would, and I hope I get some time to do so. Briefly; from what I understand, brane cosmology conjectures that our 'universe' is made of a cluster of branes which are somehow derived as a model for the fundamental forces. Gravity is considered to be a force that 'leaks' out of the brane cluster that is our 'universe'. I believe this is where Michio Kaku goes wild conjecturing a multi-verse and some vast expanse where the gravity leaks -into-. I'm fairly certain that the current understanding is less fantastical than what Kaku presents, though I would still find it very interesting.

The reason that I think this ties in is that it gives a theoretical framework that can at least produce a tentatively accurate representation of the physical situation. It does little good to chat about it when there is a rigorous language describing it and none of us know it. Perhaps if we could wrangle a physicist onto the forums we would be in better shape .