Time is it moving slower than it was in the young universe?

So basically saying that time only exists in our heads. Heh I think I get the joke now.



Well when I mentioned zero velocity, I meant not being under any gravitational influence. Not being drug along with the movement of the galaxy and not being acted on by any other object or mass. In fact even stating that picking a point in space and not moving off that point. That to me would be zero velocity, even if the space were expanding, it would still be zero velocity.

We don't have a fixed point in space, because we never touch the same points in space ever. It appears as though we are but that is only because everything we see locally is being drug along with us. But the fact is we never actually touch the same point in space more than once.

by Krumple

I often wondered what a completely stationary object would experience in space, but we have never observed anything completely stationary. Since the galaxy is moving, and we are orbiting the galaxy, and the sun, we never get a chance to see what it would be like to be completely zero velocity.

We cant see the past. We in vision memories but its not physically there.
"Space and Time are modes by which we think, not conditions under which we live. The Time we know of through clocks and calenders, were invented."-Albert Einstein

the weird thing about the past is that once you get access to it ..... it is in the present. Therefore it isn't the past??

The info realism view is that the world is information, therefore past information can exist in the present. Its all information. Other world views tend to make the past present and future intrinsic contexts to information and perception, therefore the past in the present (memory, light from stars, archaeology, writing ....) is not the thing in itself as it was. Though that doesn't stop us drawing useful interpretations.

Writing would appear to be the thing in itself. A present/past artefact (including this writing). But postmodernism points out that writing is never outside the context of its creation. I am already different to the start of this post. Moreover and crucially, reading is not under control of the writer....... and what use is writing without the context of the reader?

Because time is linked or merged into the force of gravity when in the unspeakable far future when all matter has dispersed from the universe and gravity becomes zero, time must stop

If you actually know what time and gravity is, then by all means prove it, you will win the Nobel prize, the sience world are waitin for your prove.

While I do not know what gravity and time are I know what they do, time is a measure of how we move in this dimension and gravity is what makes a small body collide with a bigger body if they come close enough

Then explain space time, how much does gravity affect it, how much will it be distorted, and at what rate?

When I hold a rock up to a mountain, I do not see it being pulled towards the mountain, it's quite unaffected.

Why are our planets in this system not sucked towards the sun, and why are the planets in a stationary orbit, and just not sucked into the sun?

How can our galaxy hold onto itself, when the centrifuge power would make it disperse.

Your understanding of science and physics is sadly laking, do a few web searches to find the answer to these very basic questions

of course it is not time that is moving slower , but the reactions between objects that is

When I hold a rock up to a mountain, I do not see it being pulled towards the mountain, it's quite unaffected.

Why are our planets in this system not sucked towards the sun, and why are the planets in a stationary orbit, and just not sucked into the sun?

How can our galaxy hold onto itself, when the centrifuge power would make it disperse.

This is because gravity is an exceptionally weak force. You can overcome all the gravity of the huge Earth just by picking something up off the ground.

The planets are not sucked towards the Sun because they are moving forward at a rate that perfectly counteracts the attraction of gravity. They are in fact continuously falling to wards the Sun, but because they are moving forward fast enough they are in balance.

This is because of several reasons. Firstly, all the objects in the galaxy are attracting one another. Secondly there is a supermassive blackhole at the centre of the galaxy that also holds the orbitting objects, rather like the sun.
Also centripetal force doesn't work exactly that way. Think of water going down a plug hole. It is spinning but it isn't being thrown outward.

No, much of the gravity acts like electromagnetism. A strong magnet can't have the same "gripping power" to small objects as to large objects, same goes for gravity.

Not quite, you miss the "Magnus effect"

Even so, the astronomers in their galaxy models can't make a galxy hold on to itself, it will disperse ..even with super massive black holes, that's why the craze about finding dark matter/energy.