what is god

I'm not real up on my Old Testament studies. Which mythologies are you seeing fused into it?

For something to Rebel against God, it would imply that it has Free-Will. It would imply that God gave it the ability to Rebel.
Angels do not have free will. They cannot Rebel against God and there is no Lucifer in Jewish Tradition. It is an invention of the Romans who combined paganism into Catholocism.

This suggests there is a 'correct' way to interpret such figurative language. Just out of curiosity, when we're talking about the quadrillions of different ways each individual will see any tale of <this> or <that>, just what is the correct way? This isn't a 'bait' DT, I'm honestly intrigued by what is correct, in the hugely-subjective area of personal interpretation.

True monotheism was inspired by the Egyptian monotheism,

First, the God of Abraham and the God of Moses were originally two different deities. True monotheism was inspired by the Egyptian monotheism, and many Babylonian elements also exist.

Actually, equating Satan with Lucifer predates Christianity. The equivocation was more successful in Christianity and seems to have died out in Judaism, but the equivocation does originate in Judaism about a century before Christ.

Thank you, I learned from that. I am following Aish and really am learning.
How are things in Jerusalem this day?

The aspect of God that was revealed to Avraham was known as K'el Shaddai. Moses was the first to be revealed the name Havayah. It's the same God, just a different aspect. Like newtonian physics speaks about the same physics as Einstein, it's just that Einstein has a deeper understanding.
And Monotheism existed since the time of Adam. Shem was still alive at the time of Abraham aswell.

Sorry bro, there is no such angel as Lucifer in Jewish text. The dead sea sect (the original 'Jewish' christians) did have many mythological stories about angels that were uncovered but do not identify an angel known as Lucifer. Jewish text does, however, identify a spiritual force known as the 'Satan' which is identified as the 'prosecutor'.

Christian Mythology does not equate Lucifer and Satan. According to Christian mythology, Satan pursuaded Lucifer to go Against God. Satan was Lucifer's servant. And yes, this idea predates Christianity in Paganism.

I wasn't talking about the mythological narrative, I was talking about the history of the matter. The people of Moses brought their war God up from Egypt and came to live with the people of Abraham who, at the time, were already in Israel.

According to the Jewish encyclopedia, the first times Satan and Lucifer are spoken of as the same individual occurs in the Life of Adam and Eve and in the Book of Enoch.

I'm not sure which Christian mythology you are referring to, but I'm unfamiliar with this notion. There are various mythological traditions within Christianity and they do not always agree on everything.

Any proof for this? There were many people of Abraham. There are the Children of Ishmael and the decendants of Abraham's children that were born from his 3rd wife after the death of Sarah. The desendants of Essav are also decendants of Abraham. Also, Abraham's people could refer to Lavan's children which formed the nations of Ammon and Moav.

But the Nation of Israel that left Egypt were the Children of Yaacov (Jacob). I've never head that disputed before.

But the book of Enoch is a book that was part of the Dead Sea Sect before Yoshka Pendri (the man on the stick). This was not Jewdaism but an offshoot which wrote extreme things.
But Jews never identified anyone known as Lucifer including the dead sea sect. The Book of Enoch has no mention of Lucifer... look at this link.

Christians began mixing up the two because of the book "Paradise Lost" and "Dante's Inferno"

According to Christian Mythology, Lucifer was the Angel that ruled over Satan. Satan tricked him into going against God and to start a war in Heaven. I had a book of Christian Mythology a while back, but I burned it. I remember having the same argument with someone 13 years ago until I showed him the book.

Again, I'm not talking about the mythological narrative; this is a historical issue. But even in the narrative, we see evidence of this. God sits and shares a meal with Abraham, but when God appears to Moses he appears as a burning bush, a scary event for Moses. Scholars have written about this.

What needs to be understood is that God changes over time. Gods merging over time into one deity, and gods being divided into two gods is very common.

First, even if the group is outside of the mainstream, the group was still Jewish. Gnostic Christians were an extreme, outside of the mainstream sect, but none the less Christian. I am not claiming that mainstream Judaism equates Satan to Lucifer, only that this equivocation can be found in some Jewish sources.

If you want to read up on it, I'd recommend this link:
JewishEncyclopedia.com - LUCIFER

Binyaman, you really burned a book?????????????

Need some Clarification on the Trinity of GOD (the Father, Son and Holy Spirt).

Need some Clarification on the Trinity of GOD (the Father, Son and Holy Spirt).

Listen! God is one!

Firstly, Angels come to Avraham and not God, and secondly the burning bush is a vision, not the method that God comes to Mosheh. The burning bush is a symbol for Israel. The bush is being burned but yet it thrives and eats the fire.

Thirdly it says about Moses.
"Hashem would Speak to Moses Face to face, as a man would speak with his fellow" (Shmot [Exodus] 33:10)

Wow wow wow... be careful.
What needs to be understood is that God is Perfection. Something that is intrinsically perfect does not change from one state to another. The only thing that we can say changes, is God's Will towards us, based on our own actions.

There is no concept of Lucifer in Jewdaism. I suggest you look in other places than the Jewish Encyclopedia for your information.
All of the people that are associated with that website are Reform Jewish Rabbis and Professors of Bible Criticism. They are not real Rabbis and have become Doctors in their own degrees that they themselves invented. They do not represent the 'true' jewish perspective but a modern disconnected perspective.

And Just so you know, there were many books that were not adopted by the Jewish People. Moby D i c k was not placed in the Bible. Also the book of Enoch was not placed in the Bible. Like I said, it was a book that existed in a small extremist group that lived in caves. It was labeled as an external book. Which means that it was on the same level as Moby D i c k. It was not written with Prophecy.

The text is fairly clear, God is accompanied by two angels, and they share a meal with Abraham. Yes, the Burning Bush is a symbol, but this does not change the nature of Moses' conversation with God.

Are you sure the numbers are correct here?

I am being careful. What you need to notice is that I am not speaking in mythological terms - I'm coming with historical information. God is perfect, but the way people discuss God, the way God is perceived, changes over time and varies from place to place. Even the Jewish conception of God has changed over time. This is historical fact.

Again, I have not argued that Lucifer is part of mainstream Judaism. Lucifer is not part of mainstream Judaism and was only a part of Judaism thousands of years ago in a fringe Jewish group. None the less, the concept did arise in Judaism prior to Christ ever teaching, much less the publication of Dante.

As for the Trinity, many perspectives exist. In the Greek Orthodox Church (this isn't universal, but as a general rule), where God is one, the Trinity is taught as a sort of meditative practice. God is such a large concept, so you meditate on His various natures in order to better understand the whole that is God.