@kennethamy,
kennethamy;123466 wrote:A fascinating report tells us that President Obama has heavy support from those with graduate degrees, called, "the overeducated"; interesting description in itself. I don't know how to interpret it. Has anyone any ideas? Here is the report from AP.
Obama Still Loved By The Over-Educated
Sam Stein Sam Stein - Thu Jan 28, 5:29 pm ET
President Obama's popularity has slipped among a wide swath of the population. Among the nation's over-educated, however, he continues to do just fine.
Gallup surveyed more than 25,000 voters over the past calendar year and found that the president remains well-liked among those with multiple degrees.
Fifty-eight percent of respondents with a postgraduate degree approve of the job Obama is doing, according to the study, compared to 49 percent of college graduates, 46 percent of those with some college education and 50 percent with high school education or less.
Indeed, while Obama's standing has fallen among each of these four groups since taking office, it is the postgraduate bunch who has stayed most closely committed, even giving the president a slight uptick in approval ratings over the last month.
The findings feed into the stereotypical political narrative that those with an advanced education are decidedly liberal and that those who are decidedly liberal are committed to Democratic politicians. Gallup, in fact, makes such a conclusion itself.
Since he has become president, postgraduates have been among his more reliable supporters, backing him at higher levels than do those in other educational groups.
But the relationship between "educational attainment and support for Obama" is nuanced. For instance, black voters, regardless of their educational achievements, back Obama at roughly a 90 percent clip. But with non-Hispanic white voters, the gap is quite large when delineating by education level.
Fifty-four percent of non-Hispanic whites with a postgraduate degree favor the job Obama is doing. Just 38 percent of non-Hispanic whites with a high school education or less say the same thing.
Whoa! I just read this thread for the first time tonight. Forgive my naivety, but I have to ask, in all seriousness -- not trying to intrude or spoil anyone's fun or, as I so often do, kill the thread -- you are intentionally playing "the devil's advocate" in this thread, aren't you? Is that how this kind of thread works? A kind of Clarence Darrow v. William Jennings Bryan thread? I love reading Darrow's rhetoric.
Well, my browser didn't show a link to the first article you cited, however, I did find the surveys at the Gallup site interesting. Did you read some of the related surveys listed on the right hand side? That Obama's first year 57% approval rating was on the low end of the continuum -- just like Reagan's 57% at the end of his first year?
No, I'm not answering the "call to debate" -- coming into the thread this late, it reads a little too vitriolic for me. By this point, in my neck of the woods, somebody would have taken a roundhouse swing at somebody else (intentionally missing, of course), then they both would have started the slow boxing-circling ritual, shouting to their friends, "Hold me back! Hold me back!" And then everyone would end up at the local bar laughing about the whole thing.
Don't get me wrong, I take the problems of our country and our world very, very seriously. Sometimes I, too, intentionally play the zealous provocateur when I feel that people are being too dry or passionless about something I feel very passionate about. If it were not the wee hours of the morning where I live, I'd probably jump right into this one, too. Maybe later. If I haven't killed yet another thread...
Anyway, interesting thread -- some good posts and colorful arguments from both sides.
rebecca