Atheism

Quote:

Olivier5 wrote:

Quote:

Quote: as Olivier5 so kindly reminded me

And as you so kindly reminded me earlier...

Sure. I wasn't complaining.

I see that you still are delusional as ever.
Now you changed your dino DNA story so you dint look foolish.
If you would have just said "oops I misunderstood the science" it woulda passed as a a mere dot. Instead you argued and argued (UNARMED I MIGHT SAY, cause your body of knowledge was, lets just say, non-existant).
Id love to see a twenty page argument between you and another member(who shall remain unnamed cause hes very sensitive about his "beliefs or lack thereof". You both hang on to lost causes like a sloth hangs onto trees.

I dont think so . I think their instincts are more in charge . We suppress ours .

The role of instincts in determining the behavior of animals varies from specieain of salt. againi amusin s to species. The more complex the neural system of an animal, the greater is the role of the cerebral cortex and social learning, and instincts play a lesser role. A comparison between a crocodile and an elephant illustrates how mammals for example are heavily dependent on social learning. Lionesses and chimpanzees raised in zoos away from their birth mothers most often reject their own offspring because they have not been taught the skills of mothering.[citation needed] Such is not the case with simpler species such as reptiles.

Emotions are complex. According to some theories, they are a state of feeling that results in physical and psychological changes that influence our behavior. The physiology of emotion is closely linked to arousal of the nervous system with various states and strengths of arousal relating, apparently, to particular emotions. Emotion is also linked to behavioral tendency. Extroverted people are more likely to be social and express their emotions, while introverted people are more likely to be more socially withdrawn and conceal their emotions. Emotion is often the driving force behind motivation, positive or negative.[2] An alternative definition of emotion is a "positive or negative experience that is associated with a particular pattern of physiological activity."[3] According to other theories, emotions are not causal forces but simply syndromes of components, which might include motivation, feeling, behavior, and physiological changes, but no one of these components is the emotion. Nor is the emotion an entity that causes these components[

This...from someone who has gone hundreds of pages with people who are just playing a game with him...where there is no chance of serious debate or discussion!

What a loser!

I don't need false hope and illusions to make it through the day.

Frank wrote:

This...from someone who has gone hundreds of pages with people who are just playing a game with him...where there is no chance of serious debate or discussion!

What a loser!

How appropriate for a sad clown!

Gees, guys, get a room

You both hang on to lost causes like a sloth hangs onto trees.

Maybe you just live a cushy life, like I do... Ever thought of that?

I respect people's right to look for hope wherever they find it. I don;t look down on them because they believe in something not proven by science. We all do believe in nonexistent stuff, like justice or paper money.

I doubt cushy. An black American growing up in the south Bronx, better known to the world as the fort Apache area?

I don't look down upon people. I'm just sadden to see the damage done to people because they and others embrace and accept a certain ignorance even when it sadistic and masochistic behavior?

Much damage has been done to people by some atheist world views during the past century.

He would quickly retreat because he really has nothing to say.