@Olivier5,
No, there definitely was no such implication. This is why it is impossible to have a coherent conversation with you. Citing Felman's publication only shows that there is not any universal, or even near universal consensus about evidence for Jeebus by modern scholars. That was relevant because you kept raning about the
testimonium as though it were iron-clad proof, and Finn started his thread with an unsubstantiated claim scholars believe that Jeebus existed. Neither conclusion is supportable on the evidence which is why i cited Feldman.
Citing Feldman's paper does not tell us whether or not those scholars believe that there was an historical Jeebus. Citing Feldman's paper does not tell us whether or not Feldman believes there was an historical Jeebus. But you, with your complete lack of reasoning abilities and logic, take the ball and run with it. You cite the
testimonium as though it were proof, and take no account of the well-developed suspicion among scholars that it is in part or entirely an interpolation.
More that that, you keep calling me a liar when i have made no claims about what Feldman does or does not believe. You're a hateful scum-bag, all you care about is arguing for argument's sake, abnd being able to claim that you've "won." I'm through talking to you, you're an idiot.