cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Tue 13 May, 2014 11:41 am
@Frank Apisa,
frankie boy wrote,
Quote:
Keep going, Olivier...because I will be here for over 2001 posts. You are not "explaining" anything...you are servicing your ego.


ROFLMAO This guy is so clueless, he doesn't even understand how he's viewed by most people who read his crap! Condescending bull shyt. Laughing Laughing Laughing Shocked Mr. Green Mr. Green Mr. Green Drunk Drunk Drunk Idea Arrow
coldjoint
 
  1  
Tue 13 May, 2014 11:56 am
@cicerone imposter,
Quote:
how he's viewed by most people who read his crap!


If "he" was smart he wouldn't worry about that. It has nothing to do with what he says, and shouldn't.
Frank Apisa
 
  2  
Tue 13 May, 2014 12:33 pm
@cicerone imposter,
cicerone imposter wrote:

frankie boy wrote,
Quote:
Keep going, Olivier...because I will be here for over 2001 posts. You are not "explaining" anything...you are servicing your ego.


ROFLMAO This guy is so clueless, he doesn't even understand how he's viewed by most people who read his crap! Condescending bull shyt. Laughing Laughing Laughing Shocked Mr. Green Mr. Green Mr. Green Drunk Drunk Drunk Idea Arrow


How do you know how most people regard my "crap"...or how they "view" me?
Frank Apisa
 
  1  
Tue 13 May, 2014 12:35 pm
@coldjoint,
coldjoint wrote:

Quote:
how he's viewed by most people who read his crap!


If "he" was smart he wouldn't worry about that. It has nothing to do with what he says, and shouldn't.


Thank you, cj. You are correct and I don't...and of course it shouldn't.

In fact, it doesn't impact on what I am saying at all.

ci is...how shall I put this...out of sorts!
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Tue 13 May, 2014 12:35 pm
@Frank Apisa,
From their absence, and comments made about you. Simple conclusion from the evidence.

How many people engage you? No very many. Their silence speaks volumes.

There's even a blog on
Quote:
Of Frank's Ignorance
Tue 13 May, 2014 12:40 pm -
Olivier5 wrote:
This is a thread meant to "park" a debate that promises to be extremely long, devoted to get Frank to understand a tiny tiny detail which emerged on another... (view)


Frank Apisa
 
  1  
Tue 13 May, 2014 12:39 pm
@cicerone imposter,
cicerone imposter wrote:

From their absence, and comments made about you. Simple conclusion from the evidence.

How many people engage you? No very many. Their silence speaks volumes.

There's even a blog on
Quote:
Of Frank's Ignorance
Tue 13 May, 2014 12:40 pm -
Olivier5 wrote:
This is a thread meant to "park" a debate that promises to be extremely long, devoted to get Frank to understand a tiny tiny detail which emerged on another... (view)





Pretty poor evidence.

But enough for someone like you.


Wink
0 Replies
 
neologist
 
  1  
Tue 13 May, 2014 12:43 pm
@cicerone imposter,
But I like Frank.
Then again, I like you too.
spendius
 
  3  
Tue 13 May, 2014 01:05 pm
@Frank Apisa,
Quote:
How do you know how most people regard my "crap"...or how they "view" me?


Averagely intelligent people cannot help being struck by the complete absence of art in Apisa's posts. His verbal toolbox is as prosaic as the knife and fork trolley of a canteen in a large engineering works and makes as much noise when wheeled out.

It is so, so from the heart that it is childlike.
0 Replies
 
Frank Apisa
 
  3  
Tue 13 May, 2014 01:24 pm
@neologist,
neologist wrote:

But I like Frank.
Then again, I like you too.


Thank you, Neo. I like you, too. Very Happy
0 Replies
 
coldjoint
 
  1  
Tue 13 May, 2014 02:29 pm
@Frank Apisa,
http://www.acidpulse.us/images/smilies/cheer.gif
0 Replies
 
Wilso
 
  1  
Tue 13 May, 2014 05:36 pm
@hingehead,
hingehead wrote:

Ignore frees me from the #tinycockfest


hear hear
spendius
 
  3  
Wed 14 May, 2014 03:40 am
@Wilso,
Ignore is the tinycockfest using restrainers.
0 Replies
 
edgarblythe
 
  1  
Wed 21 May, 2014 04:18 pm
Ready? Go.
0 Replies
 
Romeo Fabulini
 
  1  
Wed 21 May, 2014 04:21 pm
Incidentally has anybody noticed it only seems to be atheists who run for the ignore button to block anybody who upsets them?
What are they scared of?
I never block anybody, it's much more fun slapping them around..Smile
0 Replies
 
edgarblythe
 
  4  
Sun 1 Jun, 2014 06:58 pm
“Hi I’m Ron Reagan, an unabashed atheist,” said the 56-year-old son of our 40th president. “And I’m alarmed by the intrusions of religion into our secular government. That’s why I am asking you to support the Freedom From Religion Foundation, the nation’s largest and most effective association of atheists and agnostics working to keep state and church separate, just like our founding fathers intended.”

His sign off: “Lifelong atheist, not afraid of burning in hell.”


People don't usually spout off about their atheism, so I was curious what led him to make the spot. Thursday, I reached Reagan, an MSNBC contributor, in Seattle, where he has lived after leaving Los Angeles in 1994.

He sounded subdued, and said he has not been working much, having just suffered through a personal tragedy. On March 24, he said, his wife of 33 years, Doria Palmieri Reagan, died of complications from a progressive neuromuscular disease that she developed seven-and-a-half years ago. A clinical psychologist, Doria Reagan was seven years older than her husband.

But he had made a promise to the Freedom From Religion Foundation, which honored him in 2009, and he felt obligated to keep it. Reagan has been a nonbeliever since childhood, he said, and is surprised when people react with incredulity when they hear it.

Ron Reagan promotes atheism in a 30-second spot for the Freedom From Religion Foundation that ran May 22 on Comedy Central
“I think when you hold an opinion that you find entirely reasonable, you are surprised when you discover that other people don’t also consider it reasonable, and kind of get up in arms,” he said.

That’s a familiar reaction to people who are outspoken about their atheism or agnosticism, said Annie Laurie Gaylor, co-president of the Wisconsin-based foundation, which considers its mission education.

“We get emails every day telling us we should leave the country. Very nasty stuff. Death threats," Gaylor said. "The crank mail and phone campaigns are unending and almost always in response to our work for separation of church and state--not for promoting free thought and atheism. But there’s no question that atheists and agnostics are at the bottom of the totem pole when it comes to social acceptance.”



Indeed. In 2006, a University of Minnesota study published in the American Sociological Review, found that atheists are “less likely to be accepted, publicly and privately, than any others from a long list of ethnic, religious and other minority groups.” Atheists topped a list called “I Would Disapprove if My Child Wanted to Marry a Member of This Group.”

Gaylor said her foundation has been inspired to raise its profile by the recent successes of the gay civil rights movement. “We already have an ‘out of the closet’ movement, but we need to turn up the volume.” (The foundation also filed a friend-of-the-court brief in the Hobby Lobby case.)


Comedian Julia Sweeney cut a spot for the organization two years ago, taking on the American Conference of Catholic Bishops' campaign against Obamacare’s contraception mandate. The ad aired 1,100 times, Gaylor said.

Getting a celebrity with Reagan’s name recognition was a coup, Gaylor said. His spot ran May 22 on two Comedy Central shows, “The Daily Show” and “The Colbert Report.” The organization paid $155,000 for air time. She hopes to raise enough money to place the ad on “60 Minutes” in the fall.

Reagan’s spot has generated hundreds of responses. “Some are very poignant—‘I never thought I would live to see a commercial like this.’ There’s a lot of gratitude pouring in for Ron Reagan. He’s a big name, and that’s what our movement has lacked.”

Reagan, who, like his mother former First Lady Nancy Reagan, has advocated for stem cell research, said he worries that religion “often goes hand in hand with ignorance and scientific illiteracy.”

“I think what troubles me – whether it’s religiously inspired or not – is the ignorance, foolishness, and I might say, stupidity, in this country. This championing of anti-intellectual, anti-science, scientifically illiterate theories and lack of critical thinking is disturbing. Climate change is such a handy example.”

Religion, he said, is “delusion.”

“And when it morphs into believing that the Earth is 6,000 years old and insisting on teaching that to our children, that’s a very dangerous thing.”

So, hey, any freethinking celebrities out there who want to lend the cause a hand: the Freedom From Religion Foundation wants a word with you.

"If you know George Clooney," said Gaylor, "let me know."
0 Replies
 
Setanta
 
  1  
Mon 2 Jun, 2014 01:14 am
One of the problems is that celebrities, just as is the case with politicians, are not going to risk their careers for such a cause. Ron Reagan has name-recognition, but he's not a celebrity in the sense of a big-name actor who would be putting his career at risk through such advocacy.
0 Replies
 
Wilso
 
  1  
Mon 2 Jun, 2014 04:10 am
With the possible exception of politics (and we had an atheist PM) I can't conceive of anyone in Australia who would risk anything by advocating atheism. I find it amazing that the US has achieved what it has, because Jesus Christ it's fucked up.
spendius
 
  1  
Mon 2 Jun, 2014 04:46 am
@Wilso,
The problem with atheism Wilso is that it only has the facts of life to go on and, as I know from experience, the facts of life are so gruesome and horrible that few people are willing to contemplate them never mind live by them.

It is possible to self-censor the facts of life so that they are toned down and selected but that is not allowed in grown up discussions despite it being mandatory at coffee mornings in the suburbs at which maiden aunts are present who are content to pull their own legs.

In this regard you might study with profit Michael Holroyd's 2 volume biography of George Bernard Shaw who was notorious for looking the facts of life as squarely in the face as he dared do in Victorian times for fear of arrest.
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Mon 2 Jun, 2014 12:57 pm
@spendius,
That's very funny, spendi! You wrote,
Quote:
The problem with atheism Wilso is that it only has the facts of life to go on and, as I know from experience, the facts of life are so gruesome and horrible that few people are willing to contemplate them never mind live by them.


Now, change the word atheism with RELIGION, and you can arrive at the truth.
Wilso
 
  1  
Mon 2 Jun, 2014 03:24 pm
@cicerone imposter,
You understood that?
 

Related Topics

The tolerant atheist - Discussion by Tuna
Another day when there is no God - Discussion by edgarblythe
church of atheism - Discussion by daredevil
Can An Atheist Have A Soul? - Discussion by spiritual anrkst
THE MAGIC BUS COMES TO CANADA - Discussion by Setanta
 
  1. Forums
  2. » Atheism
  3. » Page 516
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.04 seconds on 03/14/2025 at 06:50:28