hingehead
 
  1  
Sat 29 Mar, 2014 05:15 am
@Olivier5,
Quote:
The issue is: moral values, some of them at least, are supposed to be absolute. E.g., how much money should I pay you to convince you to kill someone? Or simply, to hit a perfectly innocent child? I like to think that I would be saying no to any offer of such kind. Morals are absolute. Big no-nos exist. How do you enforce and drill into people's minds the big no-nos? That's where Santa comes in.

You would have a very hard time getting rid of Santa if you tried to. Imagine a public campaign with sign and advertisements and protests all over the country: "Stop lying to your children, stop the lies about Santa!"... Now imagine the response of society to that, the backslash.


I don't believe morals are absolute - take a look around the world functioning societies have polygamy (damn, the old testament flaunts it). The big no-nos don't need gods, they are acculturated.

Plenty of societies survived and flourished without Santa, say China, for example. It's still not an argument.

Ding.
hingehead
 
  1  
Sat 29 Mar, 2014 05:22 am
@Olivier5,
Quote:
Santa Claus is therefore a secular version of St Nicolas, or of Jesus. He already replaced God and His Saints in the hearts of men during the 20th century (all this is very recent)... and maybe he is PRECISELY one of these societal responses / adaptations to an increasingly secular world that Spendi and I (and you are welcome to join) are talking about... :-)


Well no. The world was secular before it was non-secular. Although I could interpret your santa theory as an indication we are evolving into atheism - because no child over 7 believes in Santa, so translating that no child over seven believes in Jesus. So we're getting there. Pretty sure no child under 2 believes in gods either.

I fear your generalisations about atheists and apparent cultural myopia colour the way I interpret your intentions. But carry on.

PS I would never be proud about having common ground with Spendi - I think he was the first or second person I ever put on ignore.
Wilso
 
  1  
Sat 29 Mar, 2014 05:33 am
@hingehead,
hingehead wrote:


PS I would never be proud about having common ground with Spendi - I think he was the first or second person I ever put on ignore.


His alcohol addled ramblings are incomprehensible anyway.
spendius
 
  0  
Sat 29 Mar, 2014 05:48 am
@hingehead,
Quote:
PS I would never be proud about having common ground with Spendi - I think he was the first or second person I ever put on ignore.


I have no intellectual common ground with anybody who uses Ignore. It won't be just me who has been run away from. There will be a range of subjects which hinge is uncomfortable with sufficient to cause him to get out his earphones.

Biologically we are as close to identical as makes little difference.
0 Replies
 
spendius
 
  0  
Sat 29 Mar, 2014 05:49 am
@Wilso,
Quote:
His alcohol addled ramblings are incomprehensible anyway.


Wilso's sober judgements are of no consequence.
0 Replies
 
hingehead
 
  1  
Sat 29 Mar, 2014 06:31 am
@Wilso,
I think at the time I said I was putting him on ignore because I was spending much more time trying to decipher meaning from his posts than he was spending writing them.
Wilso
 
  1  
Sat 29 Mar, 2014 07:34 am
@hingehead,
Good proof of a post I saw on my twitter timeline, which made the point that the most difficult person to deal with is the highly confident, uneducated moron.
Krumple
 
  1  
Sat 29 Mar, 2014 07:38 am
@Wilso,
Wilso wrote:

Good proof of a post I saw on my twitter timeline, which made the point that the most difficult person to deal with is the highly confident, uneducated moron.


Oh so in other words you mean all creationists?
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Sat 29 Mar, 2014 10:54 am
@panzade,
Never heard of that event. Can you elaborate?
panzade
 
  1  
Sat 29 Mar, 2014 11:24 am
@cicerone imposter,
wiki
Quote:
The all-Nisei 522nd Field Artillery Battalion was organized as part of the 442nd Regimental Combat Team; but towards the end of the war, the 522nd became a roving battalion, shifting to whatever command most needed the unit.
The 522nd had the distinction of liberating survivors of the Dachau concentration camp system, from the Nazis on April 29, 1945.Nisei scouts west of Munich near the small Bavarian town of Lager Lechfeld encountered some barracks encircled by barbed wire. Technician Fourth Grade Ichiro Imamura described it in his diary:

"I watched as one of the scouts used his carbine to shoot off the chain that held the prison gates shut .... They weren’t dead, as he had first thought. When the gates swung open, we got our first good look at the prisoners. Many of them were Jews. They were wearing striped prison suits and round caps. It was cold and the snow was two feet deep in some places. There were no German guards. The prisoners struggled to their feet .... They shuffled weakly out of the compound. They were like skeletons - all skin and bones ...."

Holocaust historians have clarified the Nisei 522nd liberated about 3,000 prisoners at Kaufering IV Hurlach. Hurlach was one of 169 subordinate slave labor camps of Dachau. Dachau, like Auschwitz, Buchenwald, Mauthausen and Ravensbrück, was surrounded by hundreds of sub-camps.[3]

Pierre Moulin in his recent book 'Dachau, Holocaust and US Samurais' writes that the first Nisei arrived at Dachau's gate not on April 29, the date of the liberation of the camp, but on April 28, 1945.
0 Replies
 
Olivier5
 
  1  
Sat 29 Mar, 2014 11:44 am
@hingehead,
Quote:
But the basics of ethics predates gods - how did humans survive long enough to invent gods? That heritage isn't easily disposed of either.

What pre-religious basis or heritage are you talking about here? Natural basis for morality? Why not, but spell it out...
0 Replies
 
Olivier5
 
  1  
Sat 29 Mar, 2014 12:13 pm
@hingehead,
Quote:
you were saying that atheists are all the same,

Another strawman: I never said anything like that, I spoke of common ground.

Quote:
Anything other than a lack of belief in gods is a belief and is not atheism.

LOL. And you really believe that, don't you?

What about me, who believe there are no deities? Don't I have a belief here? How would you call that belief, other than atheism? Non-godism?

Quote:
Their is no church of atheism, and it was not inculcated into me. There wasn't a user manual and I certainly didn't read about it's 'philosophies'

You don't need to read philosophy books to have a philosophy. Atheists don't stop thinking the moment they become atheists. They all have a world view, a set of opinions about where the world is coming from, and what's our position or purpose in the universe, informed by their education and their own thinking.

You're fighting a lot but you don't know what, or why. It is obvious to me that atheism is making progress in this world. Maybe it won't last; I am not saying we have a manifest destiny to rule the world or anything like that, but we're on the rise. And as they say in Spiderman 1, with greater powers come greater responsibilities. You guys have internalise your minority status a bit too much. Time to get out of the closet.
spendius
 
  1  
Sat 29 Mar, 2014 12:27 pm
@Olivier5,
If you had seen the best they could find of Aussie intelligence to send to be their representative umpire at the T20 World Cup in Bangladesh, Olivier, I think you might be a little more understanding.
0 Replies
 
Olivier5
 
  1  
Sat 29 Mar, 2014 12:34 pm
@hingehead,
Quote:
I think at the time I said I was putting him on ignore because I was spending much more time trying to decipher meaning from his posts than he was spending writing them.

His posts are often obscure and always full of slang and ellipses but for me it's good English practice.

Spendi is very smart and, below the sometime thick-layered attitude, has a good heart I believe. We disagree on a lot of things but what's the fun in talking to people you always agree with?
0 Replies
 
spendius
 
  1  
Sat 29 Mar, 2014 12:55 pm
@Krumple,
Quote:
Oh so in other words you mean all creationists?


You've got it wrong Krumpie. What Wilso meant was that Wilso is a highly confident, educated genius. He takes every opportunity to contrast himself to what he believes is meant by those words. And a few others of a similar academic order.

And his vocab. is at the stage mine was at when I was 10. Which he proves every time he puts his fingers to the keys.

As for him being educated, it is his Mum's pipe dream I'm afraid. If he was even slightly educated he would know what to make of the "talking snake" in the G. of E. instead of fondly imagining it is an absurd notion in order to discredit the Bible, a very foolish thing to attempt, and every time he tries a vulgarity of that size the educated among us titter, or, if they are Australian, they're toes curl in embarrassment.
Olivier5
 
  1  
Sat 29 Mar, 2014 12:56 pm
@hingehead,
Quote:
I don't believe morals are absolute - take a look around the world functioning societies have polygamy (damn, the old testament flaunts it).

Absolute within a particular culture, I mean. The prohibition of murder or rape is (supposed to be) absolute in our societies. In predominantly Christian societies, monogamy is (supposed to be) an absolute principle. In Muslim societies, which are polygamous, no woman can marry several men. ABSOLUTELY never.

Quote:
The big no-nos don't need gods, they are acculturated.

If by that you mean carried through tradition and culture, I agree. But religion remains a significant part of culture. The argument being made is that, as the influence of religion fades away, some of its functions are being taken up by non-religious cultural items such as Santa.

Quote:
Plenty of societies survived and flourished without Santa, say China, for example. It's still not an argument.

Letting alone the fact that the Chinese are much closer to adopting Santa than we are to getting rid of him, in their tradition the same gifts-vs-good manners (and good luck too in their case) function is taken care of at the Chinese New Year, which is logical when you think of it:

Quote:
Red envelopes

Traditionally, Red envelopes or red packets (Cantonese: lai sze or lai see) (利是, 利市 or 利事; Pinyin: lìshì); (Mandarin: 'hóngbāo' (红包); Hokkien: 'ang pow' (POJ: âng-pau); Hakka: 'fung bao'); are passed out during the Chinese New Year's celebrations, from married couples or the elderly to unmarried juniors. It is also common for adults or young couples to give red packets to children.

Red packets are also known as 壓歲錢/压岁钱 (yàsuìqián, which was evolved from 壓祟錢/压祟钱, literally, the money used to suppress or put down the evil spirit) during this period.[27]

Red packets almost always contain money, usually varying from a couple of dollars to several hundred. Per custom, the amount of money in the red packets should be of even numbers, as odd numbers are associated with cash given during funerals (帛金: báijīn). [...]

Red packets are generally given by established married couples to the younger non-married children of the family. It is custom and polite for children to wish elders a happy new year and a year of happiness, health and good fortune before accepting the red envelope. Red envelopes are then kept under the pillow and slept on for seven days after Chinese New Year before opening because it symbolizes good luck and fortune when you sleep on the red envelopes for seven nights.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chinese_New_Year#Gift_exchange
Olivier5
 
  1  
Sat 29 Mar, 2014 01:03 pm
@spendius,
I am curious about how you reconcile your anti-evolution stance with your atheism, Spendi.
0 Replies
 
Olivier5
 
  1  
Sat 29 Mar, 2014 01:11 pm
@hingehead,
Quote:
Although I could interpret your santa theory as an indication we are evolving into atheism - because no child over 7 believes in Santa, so translating that no child over seven believes in Jesus. So we're getting there.

That's exactly what I am saying. Santa is evidence of an increasingly secular Western culture.

Quote:
I fear your generalisations about atheists and apparent cultural myopia colour the way I interpret your intentions. But carry on.

My intentions? Are you questioning them? Cause I could also question yours. That's not a very constructive game to play.

I agree that I am partial, opinionated, and rather different from the rest of you guys, that my cultural environment is different, and that of course this colours my outlook. But aren't you a bit on the opinionated side yourself, Hinge? I think you have very strong beliefs too.
0 Replies
 
Olivier5
 
  1  
Sat 29 Mar, 2014 01:12 pm
@cicerone imposter,
So... you actually had a reasonably good time in a concentration camp as a kid? :-)
spendius
 
  1  
Sat 29 Mar, 2014 01:38 pm
@Olivier5,
Quote:
as the influence of religion fades away, some of its functions are being taken up by non-religious cultural items such as Santa.


That's right. And such as punishment in this world replacing punishment in the next world. which Prof. Dawkins says probably won't happen and which, anyway, is a threat barely holding the line if it might be said to be holding the line at all.

Punishment in this world can of course be avoided simply by not having the offences but then it would be impossible to convey the naughtiness of the activities, which are subsumed under the label "offences", and they would wither away under the strain of satiety and the ennui of repetitive abjection exercises.

One cannot possibly understand the human female with reference to the Christian human female. Misogyny gets no more fundamental than that.

If we get atheism we get atheist ladies. And they will quickly invent, or revive, a religion. In fact some of the less decorous specimens are already doing so and with Media keeping very quiet about it.

Very few ladies were seen in the Russian councils during the take over of Crimea and I have never seen Mrs Putin performing a virtuous deed for the cameras. In fact I have never seen a picture of her and I don't even know if there is a Mrs Putin. And if there is I imagine it to be a titular office.

 

Related Topics

The tolerant atheist - Discussion by Tuna
Another day when there is no God - Discussion by edgarblythe
church of atheism - Discussion by daredevil
Can An Atheist Have A Soul? - Discussion by spiritual anrkst
THE MAGIC BUS COMES TO CANADA - Discussion by Setanta
 
  1. Forums
  2. » Atheism
  3. » Page 460
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.41 seconds on 03/17/2025 at 12:21:40