spendius
 
  1  
Fri 21 Mar, 2014 07:43 am
@edgarblythe,
Vacuity is perfected trolling ed.
0 Replies
 
Olivier5
 
  1  
Fri 21 Mar, 2014 07:45 am
@Setanta,
Quote:
that was a response so feeble that it doesn't merit a response.

Agreed. Your responses to my posts are so lame that I should know better than answering them. I am just trying to be civil... You know me, always Mr Nice Guy.
timur
 
  1  
Fri 21 Mar, 2014 07:56 am
Spendius wrote:
I think you have a comprehension problem tim.


Feeble assertion, like the ones you use to complain about.

And your "you lot" is as weak as it can be.

You are used to adorning your discourse with sleights of hand that distract only the unaware..
Olivier5
 
  1  
Fri 21 Mar, 2014 08:04 am
@spendius,
Quote:
I know what Freud said about that. I can show that they are beneficial. I was wondering why you lot can't.

You should read Houellebecq's "Elementary Particles". A good book for modern men (most women I know hated it). He makes the case that the sexual liberation of the 60s-70s was in fact a "winner-gets-all" affair for alpha males (something Houellebecq is not...) and that the conventional gender relations and sexual controls that existed prior to the 60s were a way to “spread” sexual rapports in a more equalitarian and less competitive manner.
Setanta
 
  1  
Fri 21 Mar, 2014 08:07 am
@Olivier5,
That's hilarious coming from someone who has so little understanding of rhetorical evidence, and who so routinely employs fallacies, such as the straw man fallacy you employed in your response to my post. You're one of the least skilled debaters i encounter here. Keep making snide comments, it's all you've got going for you.

You just come here to argue, and not because you've got anything worth arguing about.
joefromchicago
 
  1  
Fri 21 Mar, 2014 08:31 am
@Thomas,
Thomas wrote:

PS: I do consider the Republican party, as constituted after the resignation of the first president Bush, a religious cult. You should read up on Paul Ryan's and Eric Cantor's faith in expansionary austerity --- it gives transubstantiation a run for its money!

They even have their own supernatural deity -- the ghost of Ronald Reagan. Still, I'm not prepared to consider the GOP a religion just yet. A cult, perhaps, but not a religion.
0 Replies
 
Olivier5
 
  1  
Fri 21 Mar, 2014 08:39 am
@Setanta,
Set, you're so easily irked that I can't resist poking fun at you... Otherwise, as a poster, you're a boring douche and -- what is worse -- a would-be censor.

You tend to chicken out of debates a bit too hastily for my taste. But hey, you need to preserve your self-esteem, don't you? Like in this recent post of mine on fairies and unicorns. I guess you've been pretending for years for the gullible out here that the "fairies and unicorns argument" is such a great argument against those saying atheism is a belief... And here I come and trash your tired argument in a couple of sentences. Poor poor Set... No wonder you're pretending there's nothing to reply to, head firmly planted in arse. And you will do so again and again, every time your vacuity is exposed.
spendius
 
  1  
Fri 21 Mar, 2014 09:23 am
@timur,
Quote:
Feeble assertion, like the ones you use to complain about.


Not at all. It was based on your reading of my post which had nothing to do with what I had said and, worse, assumed I had said something I had not.

I had not said that the uninhibited expression of the evolved carnal appetites was harmful to society. Both Freud and Wilhelm Reich, and Mailer, thought their inhibition harmful but I won't go into that as it frightens sensitive souls of the sort we find ourselves in the company of.

And it depends on what is meant by society.

There are no sleights of hand in my posts and you know what I meant by "you lot". You phoney tin-pot, half-baked, so called atheists who are all good little Christians underneath.
timur
 
  1  
Fri 21 Mar, 2014 09:35 am
@spendius,
Spendius wrote:
You phoney tin-pot, half-baked, so called atheists who are all good little Christians underneath.

Despite your baseless assertions, I'd be surprised if any of my acquaintances in real life would think some of it about me.

I'm all too used to your utterances and your sallies are far from impressive.
Romeo Fabulini
 
  0  
Fri 21 Mar, 2014 09:38 am
The Nazis used to put people "on ignore" by sending them to concentration camps and burning their books..Wink

http://i53.photobucket.com/albums/g64/PoorOldSpike/Nazi-BookBurning_zpse95ad34e.jpg~original
0 Replies
 
spendius
 
  1  
Fri 21 Mar, 2014 09:48 am
@Olivier5,
Quote:
the conventional gender relations and sexual controls that existed prior to the 60s were a way to “spread” sexual rapports in a more equalitarian and less competitive manner.


Which is the point of monogamy, pre-marital chastity and no divorce to prevent women getting the upper hand. We had 2 million years of that and humans were on the bones of their arse from beginning to end.

The "pussy whip", which even Virgil provided examples of, is the obvious outcome of a secular society.

There is nothing new or surprising in what Houellebecq said there.

The half-baked atheists on here are merely taking advantage of the Christian historical pseudomorphosis to have their cake and eat it. Their grandsons will just have to eat it if they win the argument.

Which they won't.

I couldn't read a book that women like. Charlotte Bronte hated her sister's great book and Jane Austen labels women as air-headed whores creating havoc wherever they go. Her works are one giant and brilliant burlesque on the fatuity of romantic fiction and the consequences of the acceptance of its principles which date back to the Courts of Love.

The guy who declared that Barbara Cartland was the most dangerous woman on the planet was possibly exaggerating but not by a lot.
neologist
 
  2  
Fri 21 Mar, 2014 09:50 am
@edgarblythe,
edgarblythe wrote:
Every time I think we have the trolls blanked out, they manage to break through again.
Why not charge a troll toll, edgar? Here's my payment. 2 Cents
coldjoint
 
  1  
Fri 21 Mar, 2014 09:55 am
@timur,
Quote:
I'm all too used to your utterances and your sallies are far from impressive.


Oh Oh, someones panties are in a knot.http://www.acidpulse.net/images/smilies/rofl1.gif
Romeo Fabulini
 
  0  
Fri 21 Mar, 2014 10:04 am
Ignoring people because they upset you means the ignorer lives in their own little blinkered distorted world.
For example before invading Russia, Hitler refused to believe reports by his Generals that the Red Army had overwhelming tank strength, and he found out the hard way when they rolled into Berlin (below)..Smile

http://i53.photobucket.com/albums/g64/PoorOldSpike/Photos/berlinT34.jpg
0 Replies
 
Olivier5
 
  1  
Fri 21 Mar, 2014 10:06 am
@spendius,
Quote:
We had 2 million years of that and humans were on the bones of their arse from beginning to end.

Errr, no. Monogamy is what, 3000 years old or so?

Maybe Houellebecq didn't say something new (who does?), but he said it well. I'm pretty sure you'd like his book.

This said, I never understood your rapport with sex, or lack thereof. What in hell is the "pussy whip"?
timur
 
  1  
Fri 21 Mar, 2014 10:14 am
@coldjoint,
So, the racist bitch is back?
coldjoint
 
  1  
Fri 21 Mar, 2014 10:26 am
@timur,
Quote:
So, the racist bitch is back?

Produce some of that racism, I'll wait.
0 Replies
 
spendius
 
  1  
Fri 21 Mar, 2014 10:27 am
@Olivier5,
Quote:
Set, you're so easily irked that I can't resist poking fun at you... Otherwise, as a poster, you're a boring douche and -- what is worse -- a would-be censor.

You tend to chicken out of debates a bit too hastily for my taste. But hey, you need to preserve your self-esteem, don't you? Like in this recent post of mine on fairies and unicorns. I guess you've been pretending for years for the gullible out here that the "fairies and unicorns argument" is such a great argument against those saying atheism is a belief... And here I come and trash your tired argument in a couple of sentences. Poor poor Set... No wonder you're pretending there's nothing to reply to, head firmly planted in arse. And you will do so again and again, every time your vacuity is exposed.


It is worth repeating Olivier.

When I first came on A2K I made a simply awful error of addressing Setanta as Set thinking I was being friendly.

What a gob full I got in return. He was affronted and thrummed with indignation at my taking such a liberty.

I have never come across anybody with such an overblown sense of his own dignity and excellence as Setanta displays. Unless it is farmerman or rosbourne or edgar or Wilso. A pub with a crew like that would be one to keep out of so we ought to be grateful that they don't approve of pubs.

He's been giving out for the gullible that he is an expert on history and he doesn't know one worthwhile aspect of the subject. Not for Setanta Virgil's humility in saying "but only the faintest echo of the great tale has come down to me". Which explains why Virgil could write as if touched by the hand of a god and Setanta couldn't write one sentence worth a blow on a ragman's trumpet. Nor could the others I mentioned in passing.

I do believe they represent a new type of humanity.
0 Replies
 
spendius
 
  1  
Fri 21 Mar, 2014 10:40 am
@timur,
Quote:
Despite your baseless assertions, I'd be surprised if any of my acquaintances in real life would think some of it about me.


Maybe you should read about chaps like you and me in the pre-Christian world. I think you're a wuss tim compared to the cabinet minister who said that the poor were the people he had to step over on coming out of the opera. Or to Spiro Agnew who was an elected representative of the people and held an illustrious office of State.

You're a full blown Christian mate. There was no way you could have avoided being. Same for your acquaintances.
0 Replies
 
coldjoint
 
  1  
Fri 21 Mar, 2014 10:46 am
@timur,
timur

3
Reply report Wed 23 Oct, 2013 10:00 am
@coldjoint,
I don't care the least what you did or said before.

You just arrived on this forum and have already uttered a lot of racist crap.

What does it matter?

Nothing and a lot in the same time.

Each one of us will choose what it is worth..

My response

coldjoint

-3
Reply edit Delete report Wed 23 Oct, 2013 10:04 am
@timur,
What racist crap? Is that all you got. Trying to marginalize me with an overused word that has lost its meaning.

You had no answer then too.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

The tolerant atheist - Discussion by Tuna
Another day when there is no God - Discussion by edgarblythe
church of atheism - Discussion by daredevil
Can An Atheist Have A Soul? - Discussion by spiritual anrkst
THE MAGIC BUS COMES TO CANADA - Discussion by Setanta
 
  1. Forums
  2. » Atheism
  3. » Page 447
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.08 seconds on 03/19/2025 at 05:52:12