hingehead
 
  1  
Sun 27 Oct, 2013 05:21 pm
@edgarblythe,
I don't hang around the religious threads - this is the first time I've come across him - is a he newbie or has been on A2K for a while?
edgarblythe
 
  1  
Sun 27 Oct, 2013 05:22 pm
@hingehead,
I think he's been here a couple of weeks. He spammed the Don't tell me there's no ******* proof of Evolution and one religious thread, for certain.
0 Replies
 
spendius
 
  0  
Sun 27 Oct, 2013 06:06 pm
@edgarblythe,
Quote:
But I quit responding to him on here. That's the same thing.


No it isn't.

Put me on Ignore ed for ****'s sake. We don't want you rejecting hinge's orders now do we? And Thomas's. And Setanta's.

I wont be using Ignore any time soon. It is so embarrassing at a personal level. It's admitting you are out of your depth.
0 Replies
 
neologist
 
  2  
Sun 27 Oct, 2013 08:21 pm
@Romeo Fabulini,
Romeo Fabulini wrote:
Anyway pagan women are nice, they tie ribbons to maypoles and prance round them naked under the full moon, they can certainly tie ribbons to my maypole and prance round it naked any time they like
I would suggest your suggestive language here and in other posts belies your professed image as a holy man.
Logicus
 
  1  
Sun 27 Oct, 2013 09:22 pm
@neologist,
Is it actually that uncommon to see, "Religious devotees" do this?
neologist
 
  1  
Sun 27 Oct, 2013 10:43 pm
@Logicus,
You are right, I think. Just haven't met that many on a2k.
I've always felt a prevailing dignity here, with few exceptions.
Herald
 
  0  
Sun 27 Oct, 2013 11:49 pm
@neologist,
Quote:
Just haven't met that many on a2k.

Speaking about not entirely competent interlocutors on a2k (that are not at your level of discussion) do you know that 'atheism' is a self-contradiction and hence cannot exist as a logical construct.
Atheism means 'not believing in God' (or the supreme intelligence of the universe), but if you believe (in the big bang for example) you actually believe that the universe is stupid and everything there happens on casino rules ... hence you deeply believe that the probability theory regulates somehow (without intelligence) the world. This way you believe in the casino evolution to exist outside and independently of our conscience ... hence you believe in another Supreme (notwithstanding of being stupid) Being ... hence you cannot exist as an atheist ... for you are a jealous believer in the casino understanding of the world.
Romeo Fabulini
 
  0  
Mon 28 Oct, 2013 12:08 am
Hingehead said:
Quote:
@RF- Here's the actual passage you made up (or mindlessly copied and pasted from some other dick who believes what he wants to and examines nothing)
Matt 11:16 http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Matthew%2011:16&version=NIV
16 “To what can I compare this generation? They are like children sitting in the marketplaces and calling out to others:

Congratulations mate, you looked at a bible! Keep it up and you'll make Archbish of Canterbury..Smile
But you forgot to look at the next verse which says how the world tries to get us to dance to its tune-
17 'We played the pipe for you,
and you did not dance;
we sang a dirge,
and you did not mourn.’

--------------------------------------------------------------------------

Romeo Fabulini: he dances to nobody's tune but his own!
http://i53.photobucket.com/albums/g64/PoorOldSpike/zu1sA_zps94c5327a.jpg~original
0 Replies
 
Romeo Fabulini
 
  0  
Mon 28 Oct, 2013 12:19 am
Edgar Blythe said:
Quote:
But he [RF} is posting the same thing on some other threads. You can still have your fun pointing out how screwed his head is

Hey mate if you'd stuck with the Navy instead of leaving in 1965 you might have got command of your own flotilla of fast boats like John Kerry, no wonder you're grouchy at missing your chance for glory!
You could have charged up rivers like he did, having fun by hosing down Cong villes with 50-cal fire!
Sure, a few innocent livestock and chickens might have got caught in the line of fire but so what, they were Charlies chickens..Smile

PS- why'd you quit the navy anyway, did you become a bible salesman or what?
0 Replies
 
Romeo Fabulini
 
  0  
Mon 28 Oct, 2013 12:48 am
Neologist wrote:
Quote:
@RF-I would suggest your suggestive language here and in other posts belies your professed image as a holy man

(HEY ATHEISTS, see how Neo has hijacked your thread again to take pops at me, dragging me back here to respond!)

(Yawn)... JW's like him are so strait-laced and humourless, i wish they'd be funny like me..Smile
WIKI about JW beliefs- "All sexual relations outside of marriage are grounds for expulsion, homosexual activity is considered a serious sin, and same-sex marriages are forbidden. Modesty in dress and grooming is frequently emphasized. Gambling, drunkenness, illegal drugs, and tobacco use are forbidden. Drinking of alcoholic beverages is permitted in moderation"
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jehovah's_Witnesses

Note how JW's say being gay is a "serious" sin, yet the bible doesn't say it's more serious than anything else..Wink
As for so-called "illegal drugs" what right do JW's or anybody else have to say what's legal or illegal about any God-given thing?
God said to Ezekiel- "Fruit trees of all kinds will grow on both banks of the river. Their leaves will not wither, nor will their fruit fail. Every month they will bear, because the water from the sanctuary flows to them. Their fruit will serve for food and their leaves for healing" -(Ezekiel 47:12)
0 Replies
 
edgarblythe
 
  2  
Mon 28 Oct, 2013 04:59 am
@Herald,
Here we go again.
hingehead
 
  1  
Mon 28 Oct, 2013 06:59 am
@edgarblythe,
He pulls nobody's penis but his own.
spendius
 
  0  
Mon 28 Oct, 2013 07:47 am
@hingehead,
He's quite amusing hinge at times. It's a refreshing change from your dreary contributions.

Do you tuck your shirt inside your underpants?
farmerman
 
  1  
Mon 28 Oct, 2013 08:34 am
@spendius,
I may be wrong but I think you are the only person whose ever even thought about that. Too much of that toxic Brit beer Id say.
0 Replies
 
Romeo Fabulini
 
  0  
Mon 28 Oct, 2013 08:55 am
http://i53.photobucket.com/albums/g64/PoorOldSpike/CMSF/pack1_zps1a428862.png~original

Herald
 
  0  
Mon 28 Oct, 2013 12:39 pm
@edgarblythe,
edgarblythe wrote:
Here we go again.

What is that supposed to mean?
edgarblythe
 
  1  
Mon 28 Oct, 2013 01:09 pm
@Herald,
Another person who cannot allow an atheist to be an atheist, so with the lame crap to support the notion. In short, please go away.
Herald
 
  -1  
Mon 28 Oct, 2013 01:26 pm
@edgarblythe,
edgarblythe wrote:
Another person who cannot allow an atheist to be an atheist, so with the lame crap to support the notion. In short, please go away.

Who am I to prohibit to an atheist to exist in contradiction with the laws of the math logic?
And who are you to chase me from a thread that is not even yours?
0 Replies
 
edgarblythe
 
  1  
Mon 28 Oct, 2013 01:39 pm
@edgarblythe,
There are numerous religious threads on the forum, where you can peddle it.
hingehead
 
  1  
Mon 28 Oct, 2013 02:54 pm
@Romeo Fabulini,
Damn, I thought I'd stuck me head through the middle hole at the county fair.

You should probably stick to ww2 gaming and image sharing and long lonely walks on the coast. The devil finds photoshop work for idle hands, poor old spike.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

The tolerant atheist - Discussion by Tuna
Another day when there is no God - Discussion by edgarblythe
church of atheism - Discussion by daredevil
Can An Atheist Have A Soul? - Discussion by spiritual anrkst
THE MAGIC BUS COMES TO CANADA - Discussion by Setanta
 
  1. Forums
  2. » Atheism
  3. » Page 358
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.08 seconds on 02/05/2025 at 04:01:42