@MontereyJack,
MontereyJack wrote:David, most living things above the level of bacteria and amoebae have gender, including plants.
Do you refer to a gingko tree as "she" or "he"? Do you even know how to tell.
I have always thought of plants as being neuter gender, like rocks, tho now that u mention it,
I remember about cross-pollenation. I am sure that most of us
think of plants as being neuter gender; that may be factual error.
MontereyJack wrote:When a mosquito bites you, do you complain that "she" bit you?
Do you check the underside of every dog you pass on the street?
No; I follow the general rule of grammar that he is assumed to be male,
except in the presence of contrary evidence. If u were told that
an individual citizen got the last seat on a plane, u 'd not speak
of that citizen as being
"IT" but rather as being "he" or "him";
that is not limited to humans, but the same reasoning applies to
ALL mammals.
MontereyJack wrote:Or do you just do what most people are likely to do and talk about "it"
unless gender makes a difference, like itf it tried to hump you?
Certainly not! I know
for SURE that a dog cannot be neuter gender
(not even if he has been neutered; he still remains male);
therefore, I refer to him as "he" unless informed that the dog is a bitch.
MontereyJack wrote:Gender is much less of a linguistic necessity in English for mammals other than humans.
I see no logic in that.
No sale.
MontereyJack wrote:And of course there are languages like Chinese where nouns
are in general genderless, and people seem to function quite well anyway.
I will concern myself with that, when I speak Chinese (which is never).
MontereyJack wrote:Do you refer to a mouse by its gender? A hamster? An elephant?
Of course; again, he is assumed to be male until contrary evidence disproves that.
David