Then they should be wealthy enough to feed poor children instead of killing them. I was not talking about size of the population or GDP. I was talking about raising and nurturing babies instead of killing them. https://abort73.com/abortion_facts/states/
California's abortion rate is 19.5/1,000 live births, total yearly abortions are 157,350 percent of pregnancies aborted is 24% and number of abortion facilities are 512.
Nebraska's abortion rate is 6.3/1,000 live births, total yearly abortions are 2,280 percent of pregnancies aborted is 8% and number of abortion facilities is 5.
24% of pregnancies ending in abortion to avoid starving children in the wealthiest most productive state in the union is terrible. I think Nebraska's 8% is bad enough and, if we outlawed abortions in Nebraska except to save the life of the woman, we could get that number down to around 2%. (Which is probably closer to where it should be to save the lives of women.)
Are you concerned at all that one of the largest concentrations of wealth and productivity in the world is the place where they are killing unborn babies at such high rates compared to places like Nebraska?