Proof of nonexistence of free will

Nothingness is the absence of absence which in the double negative is to say it reports to everything in its own absence...negative beingness the absence of something, or even of all things, informatively reports to those things as necessary into becoming again...their memory is about their indestructibility, their thingness beyond matter, about their necessity of being reported permanently, infinitely...
...nothingness does not exist indeed...everything does !

Nothingness is about a fake imperfection in the world, about a false transcendence...its a forged loop of beingness upon itself, about zero having a purpose after all, in the binary code and for the possibility of any code...thus its about the usefulness of time through memory and representation...in it, through correlation, for the purpose of cause, without a truer cause...

...the usefulness of colourful metaphors such as "the absence of absence" are always costly in Philosophy when directed into a certain kind of audience...fortunately I have a big wallet !

See you guys tomorrow ! be well !

Nothingness is the absence of absence

which in the double negative is to say it reports to everything in its own absence...

negative beingness the absence of something, or even of all things, informatively reports to those things as necessary into becoming again...

their memory is about their indestructibility, their thingness beyond matter, about their necessity of being reported permanently, infinitely...
...nothingness does not exist indeed...everything does !

Fil Albuquerque wrote:

Nothingness is the absence of absence which in the double negative is to say it reports to everything in its own absence...negative beingness the absence of something, or even of all things, informatively reports to those things as necessary into becoming again...their memory is about their indestructibility, their thingness beyond matter, about their necessity of being reported permanently, infinitely...
...nothingness does not exist indeed...everything does !

Everything exists? Including unicorns and squared circles?

1 - No ! Beingness and Nothingness are not the same it simply means there is no such thing as Nothingness !!!

2 - ...the absence of absence obviously means there´s only presence...

(it was meant as a metaphor guigus since there cannot be A therefore not A...it simply not A)

guigus wrote:

Fil Albuquerque wrote:

Nothingness is the absence of absence which in the double negative is to say it reports to everything in its own absence...negative beingness the absence of something, or even of all things, informatively reports to those things as necessary into becoming again...their memory is about their indestructibility, their thingness beyond matter, about their necessity of being reported permanently, infinitely...
...nothingness does not exist indeed...everything does !

Everything exists? Including unicorns and squared circles?

Yes, Everything which is the total of what exists exist monkey !
Unicorns don´t exist as we normally would use the term...yet they exist as concepts...obviously squared circles don´t exist not even as concepts, reason why they are nonsensical !

the problem further needs clarification since for many people there is the impression that when we state if not A then A is identified...when truly it is not since for instance "squared circles" don´t refer ! not A comes as a metaphor for not whatever which is not simple here to be seen anywhere !!!
the negative cannot implicitly accept that which is trying to negate...negation is so absolute that pure absence cannot refer...it not refers !

When we explain squared circles don´t exist we are not clarifying at all that which does not exist since its non existence is such that it cannot be clarified...

There is no such thing as no being, it cannot refer

, learn to read !

Stating that Being is is already a redundancy !

Fil Albuquerque wrote:

There is no such thing as no being, it cannot refer

So the sentence "there are no chairs in the room" does not refer? You are facing a serious risk of hitting the floor when trying to sit on one of those chairs...

Fil Albuquerque wrote:

, learn to read !

When I read "no being," I read "no being." Is that what you meant?

Fil Albuquerque wrote:

Stating that Being is is already a redundancy !

This last sentence is not clear enough.

No ! You can indeed report to partially absent things....if I say for instance that guigus is not here In Portugal I am asserting that something which exists is not here but elsewhere....now what I can´t do is to assert the non existence of the non existent which is completely different....and yes I was successful probably in a way that few can indeed comprehend...

guigus wrote:

Fil Albuquerque wrote:

There is no such thing as no being, it cannot refer

So the sentence "there are no chairs in the room" does not refer? You are facing a serious risk of hitting the floor when trying to sit on one of those chairs...

Fil Albuquerque wrote:

, learn to read !

When I read "no being," I read "no being." Is that what you meant?

Fil Albuquerque wrote:

Stating that Being is is already a redundancy !

This last sentence is not clear enough.

Indeed if what you mean with there are no chairs in the room comes as an absolute reference to the non beingness of chairs at all which is a trans temporal statement....of course the expression there are no chairs is the room it is actually a temporal statement thus only referring to the temporal partial absence of something which is not absolutely absent from being, that is CHAIRS !!!!!!!!