11
   

WOUD OUR SPECIES BE BETTER OFF IF BREEDING WERE INTENTIONAL?

 
 
Reply Tue 27 Oct, 2009 10:34 pm


http://able2know.org/topic/26748-1

WOUD OUR SPECIES BE BETTER OFF
IF ALL HUMAN BREEDING WERE INTENTIONAL ?


If u had it within your power to change our species
so that no child woud ever be born, nor conceived,
except as an INTENTIONAL ACT, woud u do so ?



WHATAYATHINK?
 
farmerman
 
  2  
Reply Wed 28 Oct, 2009 05:20 am
@OmSigDAVID,
VAgue question , no context (-15 points)
Intrepid
 
  1  
Reply Wed 28 Oct, 2009 05:39 am
@farmerman,
I have to agree with you. (-20 points)
0 Replies
 
djjd62
 
  1  
Reply Wed 28 Oct, 2009 05:58 am
it seems to be working well in china Rolling Eyes
0 Replies
 
OmSigDAVID
 
  1  
Reply Wed 28 Oct, 2009 06:04 am
@farmerman,
farmerman wrote:

VAgue question , no context (-15 points)
Many people are conceived accidentally.
For instance, I know a young fellow, a NYS Probation Officer,
whose mother attributed his incarnation to the failure of a condom.

If u coud wave a magic wand as a result of which
pregnancy coud occur only from a conscious act
whose intent is the same in principle as in vitro fertilization
wud u do so?

Wud u end accidental pregnancies, if u cud?

Y?

I hope that, as amended, the question is less vague
so that I can get some more points.
farmerman
 
  1  
Reply Wed 28 Oct, 2009 06:10 am
@OmSigDAVID,
You are sort of tredding along the road of logic that once gave us Eugenics, agree ?
Intrepid
 
  1  
Reply Wed 28 Oct, 2009 06:13 am
@OmSigDAVID,
How far should we go in controlling the world? Why should we play God? More thought should go into how to educate people rather than change genetics. Do we want a society of robots?

Of course, many people are conceived accidentally. We all know that. Many people get drunk accidentally; crash cars accidentally; cut off fingers accidentally; overdose accidentally; trust lawyers accidentally; die accidentally.
engineer
 
  3  
Reply Wed 28 Oct, 2009 06:19 am
Guys, this is a thought experiment. If humans could control ovulation for example, would we be better off? It would be like 100% access to birth control pills that no one ever forgets to take.

My first thought is yes. It changes all the taboos around sex. There would be no concerns about pre-marital sex because there would be no concerns about pre-marital children. Women in developing countries would be able to control family size and devote more resources to the children they have. Crime rates would be lower with the reduction in unwanted children. I can't see much downside.
OmSigDAVID
 
  1  
Reply Wed 28 Oct, 2009 06:19 am
@farmerman,
farmerman wrote:

You are sort of tredding along the road of logic that once gave us Eugenics, agree ?
Yes; I deem that to be a very fine idea.
It shoud not be limited to lower animals.

I don't wish to have any children,
but if I did, then I 'd be very interested in creating circumstances
that begift them with the most optimal advantages that r possible.
If it were possible, I 'd grant them the biological basis for extended good health for a few hundred years, better eyesight,
better hearing, better memory and computational ability, blond hair and blue eyes, agreeable and harmonious facial features
in addition to any other advantages that I can think of.

I 'd also rig it up so that thay cannot be politically correct.



David
0 Replies
 
OmSigDAVID
 
  1  
Reply Wed 28 Oct, 2009 06:22 am
@Intrepid,

Good point!
Thay shoud be programed against trusting; that 's a bad business.
OmSigDAVID
 
  1  
Reply Wed 28 Oct, 2009 06:38 am
@engineer,
engineer wrote:

Guys, this is a thought experiment.
If humans could control ovulation for example, would we be better off?
It would be like 100% access to birth control pills that no one ever forgets to take.

My first thought is yes. It changes all the taboos around sex.
There would be no concerns about pre-marital sex because there
would be no concerns about pre-marital children. Women in
developing countries would be able to control family size and
devote more resources to the children they have. Crime rates
would be lower with the reduction in unwanted children.

I can't see much downside.
AGREED
0 Replies
 
Intrepid
 
  1  
Reply Wed 28 Oct, 2009 06:39 am
@OmSigDAVID,
Would your plan eliminate abortion?
OmSigDAVID
 
  1  
Reply Wed 28 Oct, 2009 06:41 am
@Intrepid,
Intrepid wrote:

Would your plan eliminate abortion?
No. It woud reduce the need of it,
but the decision remains in the mother, by right.
(13th Amendment)
Intrepid
 
  1  
Reply Wed 28 Oct, 2009 06:43 am
@OmSigDAVID,
OmSigDAVID wrote:


Good point!
Thay shoud be programed against trusting; that 's a bad business.


only lawyers Wink
Intrepid
 
  1  
Reply Wed 28 Oct, 2009 06:45 am
@OmSigDAVID,
OmSigDAVID wrote:

Intrepid wrote:

Would your plan eliminate abortion?
No. It woud reduce the need of it,
but the decision remains in the mother, by right.
(13th Amendment)


Where is your logic? You advocate only intentional breeding and then you also advocate abortion. You, therefore, are advocating murder since the conception is selected rather than random or unintentional.

(-50 points)
OmSigDAVID
 
  1  
Reply Wed 28 Oct, 2009 06:46 am

If I decided to reproduce myself, I 'd want the best replicator available.
Then I 'd want to polish and improve the inherent traits,
elevating them to higher standards of perfection.
Ideally, a memory dump uploading into the new system woud be in order.





David
OmSigDAVID
 
  1  
Reply Wed 28 Oct, 2009 06:48 am
@Intrepid,
Intrepid wrote:

OmSigDAVID wrote:


Good point!
Thay shoud be programed against trusting; that 's a bad business.


only lawyers Wink

not only

No good comes from trusting others either.
0 Replies
 
Intrepid
 
  1  
Reply Wed 28 Oct, 2009 06:48 am
@OmSigDAVID,
You certainly jump around. From selective breeding to cloning.
OmSigDAVID
 
  1  
Reply Wed 28 Oct, 2009 06:54 am
@Intrepid,
Intrepid wrote:

OmSigDAVID wrote:

Intrepid wrote:

Would your plan eliminate abortion?
No. It woud reduce the need of it,
but the decision remains in the mother, by right.
(13th Amendment)


Where is your logic? You advocate only intentional breeding
and then you also advocate abortion. You, therefore, are advocating murder
since the conception is selected rather than random or unintentional.

(-50 points)
In essence, u argue an Equitable Estoppel in favor of the embryo.
Everything considered, as a whole: I favor the liberty
of the mother to change her mind.

Analogize it to a chic who invites over a guest for a party.
If she changes her mind, she is free to require him to leave.
0 Replies
 
OmSigDAVID
 
  1  
Reply Wed 28 Oct, 2009 06:56 am
@Intrepid,
Intrepid wrote:

You certainly jump around. From selective breeding to cloning.
Well, these are all among the choices available in this universe.


My own choice has been not to breed.
I 'm sure that u will approve of that.
 

Related Topics

New Propulsion, the "EM Drive" - Question by TomTomBinks
The Science Thread - Discussion by Wilso
Why do people deny evolution? - Question by JimmyJ
Are we alone in the universe? - Discussion by Jpsy
Fake Science Journals - Discussion by rosborne979
Controvertial "Proof" of Multiverse! - Discussion by littlek
 
  1. Forums
  2. » WOUD OUR SPECIES BE BETTER OFF IF BREEDING WERE INTENTIONAL?
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.07 seconds on 12/21/2024 at 08:32:55