The New World Order

i'm interested in the subject, not so much discussing, just seeing what's out there

keep posting, and i'll read it

I don't suppose it resonates that the last freedom we will lose will be our own ability to think independently and autonomously. Even more, losing our ability to think to ultimately become slaves to a machine is a rather chilling and sterile future prospect. Such is the price we pay for progress and perfect order. Who can argue with a superior biotech mind?

1 Corinthians 13:8 KJV
Charity never faileth : but whether there be prophecies, they shall fail ; whether there be tongues, they shall cease ; whether there be knowledge, it shall vanish away.

Comment: Just as the earth is a machine that creates humans, humans are a machine that create technology. Just as humans think for the earth today technology will think for humans tomorrow. Machines will cannibalize humans and our DNA as humans have cannibalized the earth.

It is interesting to note that the word "cannibal" comes from the Chaldee. Canna = priests and bal = baal. The Babylonian priests were known from drinking the blood of their own sacrifices.

It comes from the center of the "old world order", from Babylon. Will machines take the blood/DNA of humans and lay it sacrificed and bled on the alter of science and progress?

Return To Innocence

That's not the beginning of the end
That's the return to yourself
The return to innocence.
Love - devotion
Feeling - emotion

Love - devotion
Feeling - emotion

Don't be afraid to be weak
Don't be too proud to be strong
Just look into your heart my friend
That will be the return to yourself
The return to innocence

If you want, then start to laugh
If you must, then start to cry
Be yourself don't hide
Just believe in destiny

Don't care what people say
Just follow your own way
Don't give up and use the chance
To return to innocence

That's not the beginning of the end
That's the return to yourself
The return to innocence

Don't care what people say
Follow just your own way
Follow just your own way
Don't give up, don't give up
To return, to return to innocence.
If you want then laugh
If you must then cry
Be yourself don't hide
Just believe in destiny

Enigma

You flatter yourself to think that i hate you. All you are doing here is puking up your fantasies. You have posted scriptural passages which have not the least relationship to the subject. And, you chronically make things up, which is even more bizarre, as they have nothing to do with the subject, except in your tortured imagination.

The etymology of the word cannibal, from the Online Etymology Dictionary:

1553, from Sp. canibal "a savage, cannibal," from Caniba, Christopher Columbus' rendition of the Caribs' name for themselves (see Caribbean). The natives were believed to be anthropophagites. Columbus, seeking evidence that he was in Asia, thought the name meant the natives were subjects of the Great Khan. Shakespeare's Caliban (in "The Tempest") is a version of this word, with -n- and -l- interchanged, found in Hakluyt's "Voyages" (1599). Cannibalism is recorded from 1796; cannibalistic from 1851.

I don't care what you hate... your tongue has been unbridled and venomous to me for how many damned years?

Set you and I come from different disciplines, (thank God)... I have books to back up my translation of "cannibal". Do I want to share my links with person who has repeatedly insulted my sexuality and my mental constitution. Do you deserve to know my sources you arrogant pig? Go on with your Websters and Wikipedia version of history... Remember my posts are drivel? I was classically trained in religion and literature. Unlike you who think you are some fart smart scholar because you know how to copy and paste...

In the first place, i haven't insulted your sexuality, that's a straw man of yours. I insult you for hating what you are.

In the second place, when you claim you have books that back up your derivation of the word cannibal, i say that either you are lying, or your books are written by people as goofy or actually goofier than you are.

Free online dictionary definition of cannibal showing the same derivation.

Answers-dot-com definition of cannibal showing the same derivation.

Your Dictionary-dot-com definition of cannibal showing the same derivation.

Merriam-Webster-dot-com definition of cannibal showing the same derivation.

Babylon-dot-com (ironic, no?) definition of cannibal, showing the same derivation.

Why don't you just discuss the topic, if that is what interests you, instead of the doing the completely implausible scriptural dog and pony show, and dragging in made-up definitions and derivations?

You destroy your own credibility by doing crap like that, and then you spew hatred at me, while accusing me of being hateful. The irony is killer.

Made up? No, not made up, just rare and hard to find and below your idiotic "I'll Google it" radar... Now are you going to again push me out of my own thread just because YOU don't have my sources? Are you going to use your rhetoric tactics to derail my thread again? If you don't believe my sources, tough ****. We, Set, are not on good talking terms so doubt my word, I don't really care... It is I who has the sources for the word and you who has, well, copy and paste and err, Google... My source is a rare book from the late 1800's. Wouldn't you like to know. Cannibal = the priests of Baal

Either like it or lump it, I don't care, I only converse openly with my "friends"... If you want to be a sorry, holier than thou, pig well you deserve what is meet then. I bet you also didn't know that the name Hermes = Son of Ham

...Figures

See if Google gives you that... NOT!

As i said, i suspect that either you're lying, or that your alleged source is as loony or loonier than you are. Your apparent inability to produce a source for your claim just--i will point out again--destroys your credibility.

Why can't you discuss a topic without using irrelevant references to scripture and without phony-baloney definitions and tangential excursions? You want to discuss a "new world order," you want to discuss the possibility of a world government? Discuss them--but don't spam your own thread with ludicrous irrelevancies.

It is also interesting to note that no one really knows Christopher Columbus' national origin. Isn't it befitting that they sent an explorer from the "old world order" to seek out the "new world order". But this information is only for the initiated in the Elysian mysteries and is not information privy to the "unenlightened". When Columbus reached the new world he found the old world order, alive and well...

I would rather discuss this topic without your holier than thou attitude. Please leave my thread... I am not here to answer your ignorant ass questions, that was long past when you decided not to be a friend, homophobe... You are not going to dictate this thread when you have been as base and degenerate to me. Believe what you may you are not worth my time.

Look, Rex. Someone has voted down your last post. I don't vote on posts, i never have and i never will (i did once vote for all E_brownp's posts in a thread, just to show him how ridiculous it is--but that's only time). Obviously, other members here consider your thread to be silly. Didn't you notice that only two other people have responded to this drivel? Doesn't it occur to your that there is a reason? Doesn't it occur to you that reason is not me, but you? After all, your posts and this thread have been voted down since before i posted.

I am not here to win a contest I am here to discuss a subject. I don't care if I am liked or not. It is nice to be liked but not a necessity. To express these particular ideas with dissent only makes me a hero and that much closer to zero...

First off Set realize you are trying to define words that have been part of a several thousand year old "mystery society/religion". So do you really think Wikipedia will have their definitions as pertaining to the Elysian mysteries?

I am interested in this William Cooper thanks for the tip.

But you're not discussing a subject. You're posting lines of scripture with no conceivable connection to the subject. Then you go off on wild tangents about the "old world order" and Babylon, and you begin making up definitions and derivations of words.

Even now, you're nowhere near the subject. Can you explain, from the depths of your alleged classical education, the connection between and allegation about "Baal" (not a "god" for whom the Chaldeans ever had a priesthood--and it was northwest Semitic, nowhere near the area in which the Chaldeans arose) and Eleusinian mysteries? (You're confusing the Elysian fields of Greek myth with the Eleusinian mysteries--sometimes rendered the Eleusian mysteries--a Greek mystical practice of the cult of Demeter and Persephone. You see, when you make basic stupid errors like that, there is no reason to believe that you've had a classical education at all.)

And by the way, i didn't cite nor mention Wikipedia, so keep your silly assumptions to yourself.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A4kxTkhwR_Q&feature=related

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q3DV7GYdVdg&feature=related

I have spent most of the night listening to Will Cooper... His teachings are too simplistic for me. I am a better thinker.

He says the sun was the first deity... err WRONG. Sexuality was first long before the, err, sun. Maybe he was paraphrasing but he was simply wrong. Why did Adam and Eve hide their privates? Because they saw the sun?? No... Sexuality dominated humans long before they decided to crick their necks up and see what was happening with the sun above and time. He seems a bit simplistic to me but still adds occasionally to my knowledge.

Sun, err, Set...

I would like to with draw back a bit of what I have said... I am actually learning allot from Cooper. But his big flaw is starting with Egypt rather than, err, Babylon. I understand why he maybe started with Egypt.. Because Egypt has allot of religion to study as Babylonian religion was displaced by years of neglect, and social "fear/politics"... The mystery religions began in Babylon not Egypt... Egypt simply "borrowed" Babylonian religion.