@Ticomaya,
Yeah...I do not know what it would take either...I think that every closer would be different...and some it would help to bring them back into situations gradually...and some I think would probably regain it by being thrusted right back into those situations if they implode...because they have that last fearless mentality as in you have to get by me to win...Here it is...you want it? come get it...
I think any laid back person would suck as a closer...
Pretty much contradictory or counterproductive to the mentality I think you need to succeed at any sport...
It does make it interesting, and it is fun to watch...
But overall I see it as useless, and probably something that will be changed...
Think about it, if it is just for saves, and that is their job...Why not warm them up with one out to go? Or get them to be able to possibly do 2 innings at a time? Why don't teams bring them in when it is non save a bunch more times to prove points? Especially division rivals...They don't have to show all their secrets...
The save thing means nothing...It is all about the ego of the guy at the end...The last thing the other team remembers...If the closer is good, it is going to cause teams to collapse...if one is shaky, or a team does well against them...them it actually hurts the team leading...and it is probably more likely he will give up the lead more than half the times depending on the lead and who is batting...