27
   

Throwing Shoes at President Bush

 
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Mon 2 Feb, 2009 10:58 am
@okie,
okie, Are you really that stupid? I never claimed I knew much about foreign affairs, and I'm not interested in working for the federal government.

Where do you come up with all your stupid questions?
okie
 
  1  
Reply Mon 2 Feb, 2009 10:59 am
@cicerone imposter,
Calm down ci, its Monday morning, whats all the hypersensitivity about?
joefromchicago
 
  1  
Reply Mon 2 Feb, 2009 11:06 am
@cicerone imposter,
cicerone imposter wrote:

okie, Are you really that stupid? I never claimed I knew much about foreign affairs, and I'm not interested in working for the federal government.

Where do you come up with all your stupid questions?

The same place where he comes up with all of his stupid answers. It's a limitless well of stupid and he's the guy with the bucket.
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  0  
Reply Mon 2 Feb, 2009 11:41 am
@okie,
okie, No "sensitivity" on my part; just challenging your stupidity. I know you don't understand any of it, but I'm sure most people on a2k see it.

You don't see it, but you continue to attack me rather than the message. That's enough proof for me. I attack you and your message. Big difference.
cicerone imposter
 
  0  
Reply Mon 2 Feb, 2009 11:57 am
@cicerone imposter,
okie also ignores the simple fact that out of the nine congress members recently charged with a crime, seven were republicans. That's 78% to you, okie.
0 Replies
 
JTT
 
  1  
Reply Mon 2 Feb, 2009 12:22 pm
@BigTexN,
Quote:
I still find the irony of all this shoe-throwing business humorous.

This man's ability to throw his shoe in protest...AND LIVE...should debunk whatever disagreements this man might have with President Bush.


Not much under that hat, is there?

Let's drop this idiotic notion that the illegal invasion of Iraq was for advancing freedom. That has never been the reason for any illegal US involvement in myriad places around the globe. An honest look at the thugs and dictators that the US has supported and supports will tell anyone who isn't a complete idiot that the US brings suffering and death, not freedom.
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Mon 2 Feb, 2009 01:43 pm
@JTT,

They don't remember the Bush administrations rhetoric for the lead up to the Iraq war; WMDs.
0 Replies
 
BigTexN
 
  1  
Reply Mon 2 Feb, 2009 02:15 pm
@JTT,
The fact is that the U.S. is in Iraq and my point is, in a messed up situation, it is possible to make lemonade out of lemons. A silver lining for the Iraqi people if you will...

Obama is leading the Iraqi occupation now. I can only hope that the Iraqi people will feel the freedom of speech and protest to throw a shoe at him as well.
JTT
 
  1  
Reply Mon 2 Feb, 2009 03:52 pm
@BigTexN,
Striking a real blow for freedom would be to demand that the perpetrators of these horrendous war crimes be brought to justice. That'd really ring the freedom bell.
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Mon 2 Feb, 2009 03:56 pm
@BigTexN,
The Iraqi people did not ask us to start a war in their country. We are aggressors who went against the world opinion when Iraq posed no threat to Americans or America. Our country does not have the wherewithal to bring democracy to the world. We represent only five percent of the world population. That's a responsibility for the free world at large if they wish to reach that kind of goal.
spendius
 
  1  
Reply Tue 3 Feb, 2009 08:42 am
@cicerone imposter,
The whole point of Carl Van Doren's book The Great Rehearsal is that it is the manifest destiny of the USA to perfect a system of government and export it to the world. That isolationism is a dead loss. And isolationism is certainly not what Mr Obama is promoting. Nor has it been American foreign policy for a long time.
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Tue 3 Feb, 2009 11:28 am
@spendius,
spendi, You confuse America's intent and actions because of what Bush did during his eight years in office. Most Americans do not support the manifest destiny of the world. We, instead, promote equality for all humans, and try to help those who attempt to help themselves. As the superpower of this planet, our engagement with foreign countries will differ dramatically from the Bush era. We will talk to both our allies and our enemy to try to work towards peace for all.

Shocking for you, I'm sure.
spendius
 
  1  
Reply Tue 3 Feb, 2009 06:45 pm
@cicerone imposter,
It is too. I'm for shoving our way of life up their arses. That Ethiopian **** I saw last night needs to be exterminfuckingated. The quicker the better.

If it costs you a holiday so ******* what?
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Wed 4 Feb, 2009 12:54 pm
@spendius,
spendi, Maybe you Brits can create a coalition of the willing for that task. Good luck.
spendius
 
  1  
Reply Wed 4 Feb, 2009 02:34 pm
@cicerone imposter,
Fat chance. Socialism ends where the socialist vote says so. It only wants redistribution from above but not towards down below.
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Wed 4 Feb, 2009 02:50 pm
@spendius,
spendi, You failed to respond to what you said earlier:
Quote:
It is too. I'm for shoving our way of life up their arses. That Ethiopian **** I saw last night needs to be exterminfuckingated. The quicker the better.

If it costs you a holiday so ******* what?
spendius
 
  1  
Reply Wed 4 Feb, 2009 04:01 pm
@cicerone imposter,
Did that not say what I was thinking clearly enough?
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Wed 4 Feb, 2009 04:17 pm
@spendius,
No. 99% of the time, your posts are gibberish.
0 Replies
 
Brandon9000
 
  1  
Reply Wed 4 Feb, 2009 11:47 pm
@cicerone imposter,
cicerone imposter wrote:

The Iraqi people did not ask us to start a war in their country. We are aggressors who went against the world opinion when Iraq posed no threat to Americans or America...

And if Saddam Hussein had been continuing his former nuclear and biological weapons research just a little bit better hidden than before, as so many people thought he was, how much of a threat would that have posed? I dare you to simply answer the question and not evade it.
old europe
 
  1  
Reply Wed 4 Feb, 2009 11:52 pm
@Brandon9000,
Brandon9000 wrote:
And if Saddam Hussein had been continuing his former nuclear and biological weapons research just a little bit better hidden than before, as so many people thought he was, how much of a threat would that have posed?


Probably as much of a threat as President Bush, had he really been the fascist bent on taking over every country in the Middle East that so many people thought he was.
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
GAFFNEY: Whose side is Obama on? - Discussion by gungasnake
 
Copyright © 2022 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.09 seconds on 05/21/2022 at 12:58:32