34
   

Let GM go Bankrupt

 
 
cicerone imposter
 
  0  
Reply Sat 30 May, 2009 02:33 pm
@old europe,
They're wrong on both counts; they have no idea what "socialist" means, and they equate "partial" ownership by taxpayers of a commercial enterprise to socialism.

They probably have no idea how the stock market or 401k's work in a capitalistic system of economics.

0 Replies
 
H2O MAN
 
  0  
Reply Sat 30 May, 2009 02:41 pm


Look, look.... two guys (oe & ci) getting it wrong.... again.


The U.S. Treasury would own 72.5 percent of the new GM coming out of a bankruptcy sale process while a trust
affiliated with the United Auto Workers union would own 17.5 percent, GM said in a filing with securities regulators.
old europe
 
  1  
Reply Sat 30 May, 2009 02:49 pm
@H2O MAN,
H2O MAN wrote:
The U.S. Treasury would own 72.5 percent of the new GM coming out of a bankruptcy sale process while a trust
affiliated with the United Auto Workers union would own 17.5 percent, GM said in a filing with securities regulators.


And why does that mean it's "time to lock and load"?
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Sat 30 May, 2009 02:52 pm
@old europe,
What of it if the US Treasury owns 72.5% of GM? What's your point?

Provide some rational answers, because even when the US Treasury owns a majority stake in any commercial enterprise such as GM, 1) our government is not going to run the operations, and 2) it's a very, very, very, small percentage of the US's GDP.

Also, you may wish to observe why the Obama team thought it a good idea to take the action they did with the auto companies. I can think of several; but you can try to come up with one or two.
H2O MAN
 
  1  
Reply Sat 30 May, 2009 07:06 pm
@old europe,


Rolling Eyes are you building up to something?, perhaps a meaningful question...
0 Replies
 
H2O MAN
 
  1  
Reply Sat 30 May, 2009 07:08 pm
@cicerone imposter,
cicerone imposter wrote:

the Obama team thought it a good idea to take the action they did with the auto companies. I can think of several.



Name one.

cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Sat 30 May, 2009 07:15 pm
@H2O MAN,
It's called "jobs." Eureka!

It's not only the people working in the factories; it's all the suppliers, the transportation system, the retailers, and loan companies (banks, credit unions, finance companies, and their own credit company).

Having said that, although I can understand why the Obama team tried to prop up the auto industry, I disagreed with their action. We must also remember that the auto industry bailouts began with Bush to the tune of some $17 billion dollars. The reasoning is very basic and fundamental; all those millions of people losing their jobs do not have the same tax funded bailouts for their jobs and benefits, and I believe it highly unfair.



H2O MAN
 
  1  
Reply Sat 30 May, 2009 08:51 pm
@cicerone imposter,
cicerone imposter wrote:

It's called "jobs."

The jobless rate is growing.

Would you like to take another stab at it?
H2O MAN
 
  1  
Reply Sun 31 May, 2009 06:00 am
@cicerone imposter,


20K jobs will be lost when GM goes into bankruptcy.
djjd62
 
  1  
Reply Sun 31 May, 2009 06:08 am
@H2O MAN,
those jobs should have been gone long ago, if all the auto companies had been responsible business people they would have shed the excess years ago
H2O MAN
 
  1  
Reply Sun 31 May, 2009 06:23 am
@djjd62,

GM should have filed bankruptcy on their own long ago avoiding this bull **** Obama/UAW scam of a deal that is costing the tax payers Billions.
djjd62
 
  1  
Reply Sun 31 May, 2009 06:30 am
@H2O MAN,
or they could have stood up to the unions and closed plants like they tried to do many times, but every time, the union pissed and moaned, which is there right to do, and the companies backed down

i live near windsor and detroit, the auto capital of north america, i've been watching this crap between the unions and the auto companies for years

H2O MAN
 
  1  
Reply Sun 31 May, 2009 06:50 am
@djjd62,

I wish they had stood up to the unions many, many years ago, but there is zero
chance of this ever happening now that the UAW has Obama in their back pocket.

Only the best of the best will survive... GM won't survive.
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Sun 31 May, 2009 10:03 am
@H2O MAN,
You missed the whole message. Are you that dense?
H2O MAN
 
  0  
Reply Sun 31 May, 2009 10:19 am
@cicerone imposter,



The message is that PrezBO is killing our economy. He is causing a rise in unemployment.
The message is that O boy and his ilk have no ******* clue what they are doing.
Even a dolt such as yourself should see this message.
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Sun 31 May, 2009 11:00 am
@H2O MAN,
How is Obama "killing our economy?"

Your opinions are worth less than my dung!
H2O MAN
 
  0  
Reply Sun 31 May, 2009 11:04 am
@cicerone imposter,



Just as I expected... you have no answers.
cicerone imposter
 
  0  
Reply Sun 31 May, 2009 12:20 pm
@H2O MAN,
Re: H2O MAN (Post 3664664)
How is Obama "killing our economy?"
DontTreadOnMe
 
  0  
Reply Sun 31 May, 2009 02:47 pm
@cicerone imposter,
cicerone imposter wrote:

Re: H2O MAN (Post 3664664)
How is Obama "killing our economy?"


forget trying to get anything sensible out him. it's bullshit meant only to annoy to the point that others leave. really, taken most of the fun out of it. so, **** 'em.
cicerone imposter
 
  0  
Reply Sun 31 May, 2009 02:49 pm
@DontTreadOnMe,
Couldn't have said it any better myself. Thx.
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
  1. Forums
  2. » Let GM go Bankrupt
  3. » Page 19
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.07 seconds on 11/22/2024 at 09:12:39