60
   

California Voters Approve Gay-Marriage Ban

 
 
RexRed
 
  1  
Reply Wed 29 May, 2013 02:43 pm
@Shadow X,
Yes these "many physicians" who support your homophobe doctors cite chapter and verse, no wonder why they are the laughingstock of the medical community...
0 Replies
 
RexRed
 
  1  
Reply Wed 29 May, 2013 02:43 pm
new page bug a2k
0 Replies
 
RexRed
 
  2  
Reply Wed 29 May, 2013 02:50 pm
https://fbcdn-sphotos-b-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-ash4/263266_661839777176006_619429860_n.jpg
reasoning logic
 
  0  
Reply Wed 29 May, 2013 03:16 pm
@Shadow X,
Quote:
I have no idea. All I know is David claimed his friend was essentially a better person towards him than his wife.


So you do not know if his friend could have given better head and emotional support than his wives could?
0 Replies
 
spendius
 
  3  
Reply Wed 29 May, 2013 03:16 pm
@RexRed,
Mr Gervais is playing to your self-willed ignorance Rex. I suspect he knows it.

Lovely teeth mind you. And nicely manicured whiskers.
0 Replies
 
reasoning logic
 
  0  
Reply Wed 29 May, 2013 04:27 pm
@Shadow X,
Quote:
I just watched that whole retarded video after watching the other one. There was only ONE pairing in there that were in a position to do so and actually looked like they may have been potentially penetrating and didn't run away and that was at the very beginning. You couldn't see anything but them humping each other and it lasted less than 2 seconds so it's not even remotely definitive.


Maybe you prefer reading to watching movies?

Quote:
I would bet $100 that if it showed the rest of that video, the animal on the bottom would run away.


Sounds to me that you are soliciting to view animal sex. Would you like to see some close up graphic videos of animals getting of in those of the same sex? Maybe you would rather read?


The Gay Animal Kingdom

Joan Roughgarden thinks Charles Darwin made a terrible mistake. Not about natural selection—she’s no bible-toting creationist—but about his other great theory of evolution: sexual selection. According to Roughgarden, sexual selection can’t explain the homosexuality that’s been documented in over 450 different vertebrate species. This means that same-sex sexuality—long disparaged as a quirk of human culture—is a normal, and probably necessary, fact of life. By neglecting all those gay animals, she says, Darwin misunderstood the basic nature of heterosexuality.

Male big horn sheep live in what are often called “homosexual societies.” They bond through genital licking and anal intercourse, which often ends in ejaculation. If a male sheep chooses to not have gay sex, it becomes a social outcast. Ironically, scientists call such straight-laced males “effeminate.”

Giraffes have all-male orgies. So do bottlenose dolphins, killer whales, gray whales, and West Indian manatees. Japanese macaques, on the other hand, are ardent lesbians; the females enthusiastically mount each other. Bonobos, one of our closest primate relatives, are similar, except that their lesbian sexual encounters occur every two hours. Male bonobos engage in “penis fencing,” which leads, surprisingly enough, to ejaculation. They also give each other genital massages.

As this list of activities suggests, having homosexual sex is the biological equivalent of apple pie: Everybody likes it. At last count, over 450 different vertebrate species could be beheaded in Saudi Arabia. You name it, there’s a vertebrate out there that does it. Nevertheless, most biologists continue to regard homosexuality as a sexual outlier. According to evolutionary theory, being gay is little more than a maladaptive behavior.

Joan Roughgarden, a professor of biology at Stanford University, wants to change that perception. After cataloging the wealth of homosexual behavior in the animal kingdom two years ago in her controversial book Evolution’s Rainbow—and weathering critiques that, she says, stemmed largely from her being transgendered—Roughgarden has set about replacing Darwinian sexual selection with a new explanation of sex. For too long, she says, biology has neglected evidence that mating isn’t only about multiplying. Sometimes, as in the case of all those gay sheep, dolphins and primates, animals have sex just for fun or to cement their social bonds. Homosexuality, Roughgarden says, is an essential part of biology, and can no longer be dismissed. By using the queer to untangle the straight, Roughgarden’s theories have the potential to usher in a scientific sexual revolution.
neologist
 
  2  
Reply Wed 29 May, 2013 04:49 pm
@Shadow X,
Thank you for posting that little note, Shadow, I got my degree in 1964 and nearly ate my socks when the APA dropped this bomb. It was only because of the growing number of psych professionals who were themselves homosexual and couldn't abide being classified as having a personality disorder, as it was formerly called.
Shadow X
 
  2  
Reply Wed 29 May, 2013 04:50 pm
@RexRed,
If you were a "minister" you were one of the worst ministers I've ever seen in regards to understanding the bible.

First of all, I'm not twisting the word... the one twisting the word is the one who claims that David was having sex with Johnathon. There's nothing in the bible that states such.

Second... you clearly do not understand how to read the bible. The bible is NOT the Word of God and never claims to be. The bible is the INSPIRED Word of God. The Word of God is Jesus Christ. If you don't understand the difference then you are going to have a seriously messed up understanding of God.
neologist
 
  2  
Reply Wed 29 May, 2013 04:52 pm
@RexRed,
RexRed wrote:
The Bible also has words that condemn women but I guess you don't mind those parts...
Cough 'em up, Rex.
Shadow X
 
  2  
Reply Wed 29 May, 2013 04:56 pm
@reasoning logic,
I suggest you go read Science magazine in which 40 scientists wrote 10 articles each with a rebuttal and providing evidence to disprove what ms Roughgarden claimed. Many of which included the disagreement that most of those species were committing homosexual acts.

You'll have to excuse me if I don't simply take a homosexual apologists word for their defense of homosexuality lol They've been shown to lie over and over and over again.
Shadow X
 
  2  
Reply Wed 29 May, 2013 05:06 pm
@neologist,
That is absolutely correct. neologist. The psychologists are doing their best to change pedophilia to an acceptable behavior... in the exact same way that they did with homosexuality.

First it was claimed to be a mental disorder (which established it as something they could not control). Then they moved it from a mental disorder to only being a mental disorder IF the individual acts upon the desires in their head. Then the next step is to remove the label of mental disorder alltogether and just claim it to be an alternative lifestyle.

The APA just established that Pedophilia is no longer a mental disorder unless it causes the individual to act upon their desires. What do you think the next step is?
RexRed
 
  1  
Reply Wed 29 May, 2013 05:13 pm
@neologist,
It's called the original sin... males write a story casting woman into millennium of shame due to Eve and her tendency to sin more than her husband...

For all women are weak minded and much more gullible then their wise and sinless male counterparts... (cynical)

Really God?

Now explain to me how the words "original sin" do not even occur in the Bible.

And twist and wrench the words of that pathetic book to seem okay when they are underhanded and fraught with bigotry and male chauvinist lies.

Explain how God found grace in Mary and she conceived because she is merely an instrument of God's pleasure and selfish dictates...

Explain how Mary Magdalene was turned into a whore and not the head of the church no, Peter is the head..

The words of the Bible are not trustworthy and true they are worthy of scorn and suspicion.

And Jesus did not tell the woman she was not a dog he just agreed with her she deserved a few crumbs from the table along with the dogs...

After all Gentile woman are dogs right? WRONG!

Matthew 15:22-27 A Canaanite woman from that vicinity came to him, crying out, “Lord, Son of David, have mercy on me! My daughter is suffering terribly from demon-possession.” Jesus did not answer a word. So his disciples came to him and urged him, “Send her away, for she keeps crying out after us.” He answered, “I was sent only to the lost sheep of Israel.” The woman came and knelt before him. “Lord, help me!” she said. He replied, “It is not right to take the children’s bread and toss it to their dogs.

Comment:
It doesn't matter how many times I say these things because one has to have a conscience to favor truth over religious dogma that is compounded further by stupid blind faith in a book that has no more moral authority than the phone book.
RexRed
 
  0  
Reply Wed 29 May, 2013 05:20 pm
@neologist,
Maybe you should have gotten a degree in psychiatry then you could force your ideas on gays with a bit more than the spaghetti monster to back your opinions up...

Psychiatry Giant Sorry for Backing Gay ‘Cure’
http://www.nytimes.com/2012/05/19/health/dr-robert-l-spitzer-noted-psychiatrist-apologizes-for-study-on-gay-cure.html?pagewanted=all

Puerto Rico governor signs LGBT bills into law
http://www.washingtonblade.com/2013/05/29/puerto-rico-governor-signs-lgbt-bills-into-law/

There are people with hearts, love and understanding and then there are people with Bibles...
reasoning logic
 
  1  
Reply Wed 29 May, 2013 05:25 pm
@neologist,
Quote:
It was only because of the growing number of psych professionals who were themselves homosexual and couldn't abide being classified as having a personality disorder, as it was formerly called.


Are you suggesting that these homosexual understood things that their counterparts were not able to understand being you admit homosexuality was formerly called a personality disorder?
reasoning logic
 
  1  
Reply Wed 29 May, 2013 05:28 pm
@Shadow X,
Quote:
If you were a "minister" you were one of the worst ministers I've ever seen in regards to understanding the bible.


If he understood it the way that you understand it would you praise him and find him to be more acceptable?

Are you 100% certain that you do not hold confirmation biases?
Shadow X
 
  2  
Reply Wed 29 May, 2013 05:28 pm
@RexRed,
That's what I said... you don't have a clue what you're talking about. At least as far as I'm concerned... I can't speak for the rest of the christians because my point of view is different than most...

With that being said, the reason original sin is not in the bible is because it doesn't exist... at least not in the way that you're thinking of it. There's no sin that everyone carries around with them making them sinful creatures from the moment they're born to the moment they die.

You also don't understand what Jesus said. He was not calling her a dog. He was using an analogy to make a point. He was telling the woman that these words are for the jewish population FIRST. That begs the question... why is it for the jewish population first? Because Jesus believed that they would believe whereas the gentile population would not be as accepting. However, the gentile population showed over and over again that they were willing to accept his teachings as easily or even more so than the jewish population. That's why when he encountered people in the gentile population who had great faith, he helped them just like he did a jew.
0 Replies
 
reasoning logic
 
  1  
Reply Wed 29 May, 2013 05:30 pm
@Shadow X,
Quote:
I suggest you go read Science magazine in which 40 scientists wrote 10 articles each with a rebuttal and providing evidence to disprove what ms Roughgarden claimed.


You could share it and I would read it. Are these scientists creationists?
Shadow X
 
  2  
Reply Wed 29 May, 2013 05:32 pm
@reasoning logic,
What you stated to neologist is tantamount to stating Pedophile Psychiatrists understood things about pedophiles that their counterparts were not able to understand...

That's absurd. Obviously the point is that those derelicts got into a position where they were capable of changing a label that they didn't like because it described their behavior as being mentally unstable. Shockingly, after homosexuality was accepted by those people, they then started to advocate for pedophilia to be sstricken from being a disorder.
0 Replies
 
Shadow X
 
  2  
Reply Wed 29 May, 2013 05:35 pm
@reasoning logic,
http://www.the-scientist.com/?articles.view/articleNo/23946/title/Sexual-selection-alternative-slammed/
0 Replies
 
Shadow X
 
  2  
Reply Wed 29 May, 2013 05:36 pm
@reasoning logic,
No. I would praise him if he was capable of using context and crossreferencing to back up his position. But he can't... whereas I can.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

New York New York! - Discussion by jcboy
Prop 8? - Discussion by majikal
Gay Marriage - Discussion by blatham
Gay Marriage -- An Old Post Revisited - Discussion by pavarasra
Who doesn't back gay marriage? - Question by The Pentacle Queen
 
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.05 seconds on 02/04/2025 at 04:00:55