California Voters Approve Gay-Marriage Ban

Since when is overpopulation a benefit? We are taxing the earth's resources to death and you have some freakish idea that we need to make more babies...

First of all the idea that America is overpopulated is absurd. But even if it wasnt , at BEST, the Only argument you might have is why heterosexuals should not receive benefits (which I would agree with). But you have no argument WHATSOEVER as to why homosexuals should receive them.

The world’s seemingly relentless march toward overpopulation achieved a notable milestone in 2012: Somewhere on the planet, according to U.S. Census Bureau estimates, the 7 billionth living person came into existence.

Comment:
But remember to make more babies please!!!! (cynical)

Once again you seem to forget that BISEXUALS often divorce and get married to a same sex partner and they bring their families with them. These are real families with real children. Their family is equal to any others.

First of all I don't give a fat babies behind about the hundreds of millions born in china or India or Africa. They have little to no impact on the USA.

Second if you truly believe what you said then that's fine. But then your argument becomes we should not provide anyone with marriage benefits. But you have no argument for why homosexuals should receive them. Marriage benefits are expressly designed to promote child creation. If you are not promoting child creation then We should not provide anyone with marriage benefits. Certainly not homosexuals.

Again red we are paying for the CREATION of the child. Not the raising of it. Anyone can raise a child. Only the heterosexual relationship can create them. That's why we pay them.

Gays pay taxes too or did you simply forget that... anyone with working private parts can have sex and make a child but a real parent raises the child that is where the real effort is.

Paying taxes is irrelevant. A married couple takes MORE out of the system in benefits than they put into the system in taxes therefore to sustain the marriage system they MUST provide more benefit than "paying their taxes".

You are saying it is harder to have sex than it is to stick with and parent a child till they are mature?

And tonight we see the spectacle of one of the most secular governments in the world banging homosexual heads on the streets of Moscow, literally, and here, under the Christian dispensation homosexuals have "Pride" rallies with floats and bands and declarations of undying love flounces.

You might have reminded people, Shad, that a 10% reduction in the birth rate would throw a lot of experts into panic mode. The nice steady flow of infants being taken for granted is what allows politicians to focus their attention on incidents suitable for milking.

400,000 fewer babies would be something of a headache for a number of well established institutions. Right away. This year.

For homosexuals it is.

It might be like a cold front is for ice-cream vans.

But not for bisexuals!!! And gays can still make babies it is called in vetro fertilization. Those who sire children and then leave their children for the world to raise mark the child with the stigma of being called "bastards".

That is what useless men used to do in the old western days, they would go from town to town siring bastard children. Then move on to the next...

Is this your idea of the core of family values?

Is this your way of saying that your empathic radius is limited and that you are way different than the Therapeutae ?
If we were to go back and examine the logic you shared would we find any doubt that economics or profits are a driving factor in your use of logic?



So it seems that your main interest is in the economical "or in your words the detrimental causes that homosexuals have on society? When you think of the economical or detrimental that homosexuals have on society, how do you view this differently than the slave masters of the past viewed it?

When were they not?

You still don't see the difference between being homosexual and promoting it.

What is it that makes you so certain that I am unable to see the sociopathic responses that others share?

If a bisexual wants to get married to the partner they are producing the child with they have every right to get married and receive benefits. Also it doesn't matter if they use in vitro. They are only able to do so by going OUTSIDE of their homosexual relationship and taking advantage of the HETEROSEXUAL relationship (egg and sperm) because in and of themselves homosexuals are incapable of reproducing.

The child is still half theirs... OR are you saying heterosexuals contribute more than half of their DNA? Yes gays have DNA too that is capable of splitting and make them the full fledged parent of a child.

I really think you are jealous of gays because they get to do what you secretly wanted...

If you can't have the life you secretly wanted you will do anything to see they don't... You should be in my other topic "homosexuals against homosexuality". A real straight man would not be so concerned what gays and lesbians do in the privacy of their own bedroom. Gay priests are against gay marriage too...

Take a long hard look at your own ilk...

Top 15 Anti-Gay Activists Caught Being Gay
http://www.ranker.com/list/top-10-anti-gay-activists-caught-being-gay/joanne

How many countless lives have been hurt by these anti gay activists trying to use the spotlight of LGBT emancipation for their own crooked and heartless gain.

Another ridiculous outcome from the Boy Scouts. There are many who are unhappy because they now allow gays to become Boy Scouts, so they're planning to start another boy's group that will discriminate against gays.

You seem to be talking about Rush Limbaugh and his followers.