60
   

California Voters Approve Gay-Marriage Ban

 
 
Shadow X
 
  1  
Reply Sat 25 May, 2013 08:05 am
@ehBeth,
Unlike you I don't just make claims with nothing to back them up.

http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2FBF01542053

And it states: "86% of men, homosexual men, or men who engage in molestation of children, 86% of them identified as homosexual or bisexual."
0 Replies
 
Shadow X
 
  1  
Reply Sat 25 May, 2013 08:08 am
@ehBeth,
and I don't think you understand what you're saying... OF COURSE more heterosexual men are pedophiles because the VAST majority of the population are heterosexual.

You really need to take a statistics course and understand why 26% of pedophiles being homosexual and being so far overrepresented is MUCH more of a material statistic than the numbers for heterosexuals who are underrepresented.

Do yourself a favor. Go learn what per capita means. And then go learn why you're much more likely to meet a pedophile in a room full of 100 homosexuals than a room full of 100 heterosexuals and why that matters MUCH more than this idea of "most pedophiles are heterosexuals".
RexRed
 
  1  
Reply Sat 25 May, 2013 08:44 am
Canadian Supreme Court Rules Biblical Speech Opposing Homosexual Behavior is a ‘Hate Crime’
http://christiannews.net/2013/02/28/canadian-supreme-court-rules-biblical-speech-opposing-homosexual-behavior-is-a-hate-crime/

Biblical speech opposing homosexuality a hate crime, hmmm
RABEL222
 
  1  
Reply Sat 25 May, 2013 09:05 am
@Shadow X,
Oh, I recognize you now. Another I talk to God and he told me to condemn these people. He recinded the judge not lest ye be judged rule. Well if you can judge so can I. I wont be conversing with you any more.
Shadow X
 
  1  
Reply Sat 25 May, 2013 09:46 am
@RexRed,
Fortunately for us we have freedom of religion here in the United States so don't look for that to happen here lol
0 Replies
 
Shadow X
 
  1  
Reply Sat 25 May, 2013 09:49 am
@RABEL222,
That's funny Because I have not used God or religion to explain why homosexuality is wrong and should not be advocated for.

It's also funny that rather than address the point I made you simply attacked my character. Could it be because you have no rebuttal? I think so. Not a valid one at least.
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Sat 25 May, 2013 09:59 am
@Shadow X,
Whatever your reasons for what you believe should not be advocated for are all wrong! Tell me what's you believe you should not advocate for?

You do understand terms like "equality, discrimination, all men are created equal, Bill of Rights, and our Constitution."
reasoning logic
 
  1  
Reply Sat 25 May, 2013 12:05 pm
@Shadow X,
Quote:
That's funny Because I have not used God or religion to explain why homosexuality is wrong and should not be advocated for.

It's also funny that rather than address the point I made you simply attacked my character. Could it be because you have no rebuttal? I think so. Not a valid one at least.


What you seem to fail to understand or care less about is that all groups of people have flaws and different flaws are more predominant in different groups.

We should all be under the scope when it comes to sociopathic behavior.

Quote:
Could it be because you have no rebuttal? I think so. Not a valid one at least.


Do you think that confirmation biases may play a part in your inability to see valid points of rebuttal?
reasoning logic
 
  0  
Reply Sat 25 May, 2013 12:39 pm
@RexRed,

Quote:

“They actually used the concept that truth is not a defense.”


I kinda feel sorry for this man because he thinks he knows the truth.

Quote:
“The ruling and the reasoning [of the court] is terrible,” he told reporters.


Do you think it may be possible for Whatcott to get a dose of reason? Shocked

Quote:
“It’s worse than I expected,” Whatcott added. “What it means is that my life is over as I know it.”


We can only hope. Smile
0 Replies
 
reasoning logic
 
  0  
Reply Sat 25 May, 2013 12:41 pm
@RexRed,

Quote:
Biblical speech opposing homosexuality a hate crime, hmmm


It sure took them long enough to figure it out.

Quote:

“They actually used the concept that truth is not a defense.”


I kinda feel sorry for this man because he thinks he knows the truth.

Quote:
“The ruling and the reasoning [of the court] is terrible,” he told reporters.


Do you think it may be possible for Whatcott to get a dose of reason? Shocked

Quote:
“It’s worse than I expected,” Whatcott added. “What it means is that my life is over as I know it.”


We can only hope. Smile
0 Replies
 
spendius
 
  1  
Reply Sat 25 May, 2013 12:49 pm
@reasoning logic,
Quote:
What you seem to fail to understand or care less about is that all groups of people have flaws and different flaws are more predominant in different groups.


It is one thing rl to have certain characteristics and it is quite another to promote their desirability in a population.

The Russian government, not known for religious piety, has told the organisers of a proposed homosexual pride demonstration that it will be illegal. Which I presume means that the police will be ordered to disperse it and possibly make arrests.

One has to be careful one doesn't stop getting bathed because religious people do so. Or taking Sundays and other special religious days, off work. A 7-day week was the order of the Fat Cats before the Church insisted we have a day of rest. So also with age of consent rules.

Castigations of religion have gone hand in hand with repressions of all sorts in recent times.

There are others, besides the religious, who are opposed to public displays of homosexual conduct.

I heard on the News that homosexuals are disbarred from being Scout Masters.
spendius
 
  1  
Reply Sat 25 May, 2013 01:04 pm
@reasoning logic,
It might be worth considering that homosexuality was made illegal because of its "in your face" public displays rather than the homosexuality itself.

Most pub landlords tolerate heterosexual kissing and cuddling but I don't think many would allow homosexual kissing. I have seen lesbians kissing in a pub but it was quite obvious that they were being provocative in the sight of other young ladies. Enticing them one supposes. The public display being the whole content of the kissing.

I have never seen two males kissing in a pub. And pubs are the last bastion of freedom.

There is something about kissing a person wearing trousers which I think is the source of this blatant discrimination and flagrant denial of human rights. It is a something which defies explanation if one feels constrained to say nothing improper.
0 Replies
 
RexRed
 
  3  
Reply Sat 25 May, 2013 01:12 pm
Bikers Protect 9 Year-Old Tornado Victim’s Funeral From Westboro Protesters (VIDEO)
http://samuel-warde.com/2013/05/bikers-protect-9-year-old-tornado-victims-funeral-from-westboro-protesters-video/
0 Replies
 
reasoning logic
 
  1  
Reply Sat 25 May, 2013 01:24 pm
@spendius,
Quote:
The Russian government, not known for religious piety, has told the organisers of a proposed homosexual pride demonstration that it will be illegal. Which I presume means that the police will be ordered to disperse it and possibly make arrests.


Being that you show an interest in Russian culture and arts I was curious if you thought this very young girl is artistic.

spendius
 
  0  
Reply Sat 25 May, 2013 03:05 pm
@reasoning logic,
No young girls are artistic rl.
reasoning logic
 
  1  
Reply Sat 25 May, 2013 03:16 pm
@spendius,
Quote:
No young girls are artistic rl.


Please explain. Shocked
spendius
 
  0  
Reply Sat 25 May, 2013 03:24 pm
@reasoning logic,
I prefer to decline the invitation rl.
0 Replies
 
Shadow X
 
  1  
Reply Sat 25 May, 2013 04:28 pm
@cicerone imposter,
I asked you this before but you conveniently ignored it. So I'll ask you again.

Do you TRULY believe in equality for all and equal rights and blah blah blah? Or are you just using it to justify your position on homosexuality.

Here... Lets see. Do you feel that an incestuous couple... A brother and sister wh are both 20yo or a 50yo dad and his 18 year old son or daughter wants to get married. You think that's perfectly acceptable right? I mean equality and equal rights and all that stuff you just said you believe in. Not only should they be allowed to marry but you should have to pay for their marriage benefits with your hard earned money.

Not only should those incestuous couples be allowed to marry but you also think they should have the right to force those beliefs on your children whether you agree with them or not. Right? Your children should be taught that as long as they are consensual adults then having sex with and marrying your mom or dad or brother or sister is a perfectly acceptable lifestyle choice. Right?
RexRed
 
  1  
Reply Sat 25 May, 2013 04:38 pm
@Shadow X,
Do you think because heterosexuals get to marry that people should then be able to marry their pets?

If marriage is such a slippery slope why allow it at all?

I am getting tired of your knight move logic...

Two steps one way three steps another way and therefore gays are blah blah blah.
Shadow X
 
  0  
Reply Sat 25 May, 2013 04:40 pm
@RexRed,
Uhhhhh no. The reason heterosexuals are allowed to marry and receive benefits is because they produce a benefit to society that is worth more than the money society pays them for marriage benefits. That benefit is child creation.
 

Related Topics

New York New York! - Discussion by jcboy
Prop 8? - Discussion by majikal
Gay Marriage - Discussion by blatham
Gay Marriage -- An Old Post Revisited - Discussion by pavarasra
Who doesn't back gay marriage? - Question by The Pentacle Queen
 
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.05 seconds on 07/05/2025 at 11:22:57