60
   

California Voters Approve Gay-Marriage Ban

 
 
Shadow X
 
  1  
Reply Tue 21 May, 2013 05:35 pm
@RexRed,
I don't even think you know what you're saying anymore. You're certainly going far off the topic of conversation.
0 Replies
 
reasoning logic
 
  2  
Reply Tue 21 May, 2013 05:36 pm
@Shadow X,
Quote:
Those are based on arrests made and the demographics involved therein.

Unless you're saying there's some massive conspiracy by all police officers to make homosexuals look like sexual predators then I don't really see your point.

And if you are saying that then you're just deluding yourself to continue to advance the homosexual agenda in the face of absolutely damning numbers.


Do you honestly think that all pedophilia behavior is reported. What is the percent of unreported pedophilia behavior by family members? You have studied the psychology on this haven't you?

Again what you are talking about is sociopathic behavior. Do you really think a sociopath cares about how they get off? If so I do seem to agree with you.
They seem to be for the most part heterosexual, interested of being homosexual. Again we could take this even further which you do not seem to have an interest in and talk about how many more of them claim to be Christians than any other group.
Shadow X
 
  1  
Reply Tue 21 May, 2013 05:42 pm
@reasoning logic,
total number is irrelevant...

You have to look at whether they are over or under represented. Heterosexuals are underrepresented because they represent 98% of the total population but only 74% of the total pedophiles. Homosexuals are overrepresented because they represent 2% of the total population and yet 26% of the total pedophilia.

And of course much of the pedophilia is not reported... but heck even if you drop the total amount of homosexual pedophilia by 10% you're still looking at them being vastly overrepresented at around 16%.

How do you people not see this is a problem? Are you THAT blinded by political correctness and the desire to promote the homosexual agenda that you REFUSE to acknowledge the absurdly high rate of homosexual pedophilia? I mean seriously...
RexRed
 
  1  
Reply Tue 21 May, 2013 05:48 pm
@Shadow X,
Matthew 4:5 And the devil, taking him up into an high mountain, shewed unto him all the kingdoms of the world in a moment of time. 6 And the devil said unto him, All this power will I give thee, and the glory of them: for that is delivered unto me; and to whomsoever I will I give it. 7 If thou therefore wilt worship me, all shall be thine. 8 And Jesus answered and said unto him, Get thee behind me, Satan: for it is written, Thou shalt worship the Lord thy God, and him only shalt thou serve.

Ambiguous to me... and all punctuation was added because God did not know how to punctuate yet when he dictated the Bible...

Thomas Called Jesus his "God" and Jesus did not refute it...

John 20:28 And Thomas answered and said unto him, My Lord and my God. 29 Jesus saith unto him, Thomas, because thou hast seen me, thou hast believed: blessed are they that have not seen, and yet have believed.

Jesus did not say, "No Thomas, I am not your God..."

Suppose you hate Catholics also for believing exactly what Thomas did... I don't care if the Bible says Jesus was or was not God... The Bible has already shown to me it has serious problems that I cannot with a good conscience believe in.

You certainly seem like a hater on a grand scale... So was Hitler... and he was sure and certain too...
reasoning logic
 
  4  
Reply Tue 21 May, 2013 05:48 pm
@Shadow X,
Quote:
However, I will say this. I believe the bible (specifically Jesus' doctrine) is absolutely logical, IF you make one assumption. That assumption is that God DOES exist.


OK I will leave you alone, I see what is going on and by the way I am not here to attack the assumptions of theists.
0 Replies
 
JeffreyEqualityNewma
 
  1  
Reply Tue 21 May, 2013 05:50 pm
@Shadow X,
You're irrelevant because your just another bogus account on here, goes along with your other personalities. Not fooling anyone but yourself.
ehBeth
 
  1  
Reply Tue 21 May, 2013 05:51 pm
@Shadow X,
Shadow X wrote:

total number is irrelevant...


the total number absolutely matters

if there are 1000 heterosexual paedophiles and 1 homosexual paedophile, I want all of them to not act on their paedophilia, but we need to accept the reality of the 1000 heterosexual paedophiles and the danger they pose to children


Shadow X
 
  1  
Reply Tue 21 May, 2013 05:52 pm
@RexRed,
If you were using Matthew 4 to dispute the tempting God argument... you didn't even quote the correct portion that references the tempting God part.

Actually if you look Thomas did not call him God. Thomas did not use the same word for God that is used in the rest of the gospel. Thomas uses the word that is defined as a vice regent or representative of God... something which Jesus did claim.

I don't hate anyone. Even gays or pedophiles. I don't agree with them and certainly don't think their behavior is acceptable or should be advocated for... but I do not hate them. I certainly don't hate anyone for thinking Jesus is God. I think it's a dangerous proposition to do so because if you're wrong you're committing idolatry.

And I'm not a hater. I just refuse to accept immoral behavior like pedophilia, homosexuality, incest, etc etc.
Shadow X
 
  1  
Reply Tue 21 May, 2013 05:53 pm
@JeffreyEqualityNewma,
I don't even know what that means lol So if you were attempting to insult me you had an epic fail
Shadow X
 
  1  
Reply Tue 21 May, 2013 05:54 pm
@ehBeth,
That's fine, but that's not how it works. You can't compare 1 to 1000 lol.

You have to compare it per 100. In otherwords... if you put 100 homosexuals in a room and you put 100 heterosexuals in a room. Statistically you are MUCH more likely to encounter a pedophile in the room of 100 homosexuals than you are in the room of 100 heterosexuals.

That's simply an irrefutable fact.
JeffreyEqualityNewma
 
  1  
Reply Tue 21 May, 2013 05:54 pm
@Shadow X,
Oh you know what I'm talking about.
reasoning logic
 
  1  
Reply Tue 21 May, 2013 05:56 pm
@Shadow X,
Quote:

You have to look at whether they are over or under represented. Heterosexuals are underrepresented because they represent 98% of the total population but only 74% of the total pedophiles


Again what we are talking about is sociopathic behavior and I would not say that their heterosexuals desires are under represented.
Shadow X
 
  1  
Reply Tue 21 May, 2013 05:56 pm
@JeffreyEqualityNewma,
Are you insenuating that I'm someone who has posted on here before? If so, you definitely had an epic fail.
ehBeth
 
  1  
Reply Tue 21 May, 2013 05:57 pm
@Shadow X,
The reality is (work on your statistics some more) that most children are more likely to be in settings with 100 heterosexuals than in settings with 100 homosexuals.

Which means danger danger Will Robinson for children in settings composed primarily of heterosexuals.
cicerone imposter
 
  2  
Reply Tue 21 May, 2013 05:58 pm
@Shadow X,
The only "epic failure" is your showing up on a2k.
0 Replies
 
RexRed
 
  1  
Reply Tue 21 May, 2013 05:59 pm
@Shadow X,
If someone took heterosexual marriage away and started calling heterosexuals sick and treated them like the dregs of society constantly saying they would burn in hell then we could measure how much more pedophilia in heterosexuals would increase. Your statistics have no scientific basis with which to interpret the data.

I am sure gay kids kill themselves because they are gay and not because they are bullied... (cynical)
Shadow X
 
  1  
Reply Tue 21 May, 2013 05:59 pm
@reasoning logic,
No see, you're using semantics to attempt to change the argument. Because if you can subsume pedophilia under the "sociopath" paradigm, then you can attempt to broaden the numbers to include behaviors that have nothing to do with pedophilia... which would of course make the homosexuals numbers look better.

The ONLY behavior that I'm concerned with in this argument is pedophilia.
Shadow X
 
  1  
Reply Tue 21 May, 2013 06:00 pm
@ehBeth,
So what? lol What's that supposed to prove?

You're not understanding the argument. If youa re more likely to encounter a pedophile in a room full of 100 homosexuals than you are to encounter one in a room full of 100 heterosexuals... then EVERY homosexual you meet is MORE LIKELY to be a pedophile than any heterosexual you meet.

THAT'S THE POINT lol
0 Replies
 
Shadow X
 
  1  
Reply Tue 21 May, 2013 06:01 pm
@RexRed,
loller so it's society's fault that these homosexuals are raping little children because the poor gay people are picked on.

Get serious.
0 Replies
 
reasoning logic
 
  0  
Reply Tue 21 May, 2013 06:03 pm
@Shadow X,
Quote:
The ONLY behavior that I'm concerned with in this argument is pedophilia.


I find it sad that you want to classify pedophile rape as something less than sociopathic.
 

Related Topics

New York New York! - Discussion by jcboy
Prop 8? - Discussion by majikal
Gay Marriage - Discussion by blatham
Gay Marriage -- An Old Post Revisited - Discussion by pavarasra
Who doesn't back gay marriage? - Question by The Pentacle Queen
 
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.05 seconds on 07/08/2025 at 04:56:07