@ebrown p,
ebrown, you chose to miss my point on what would happen. BTW ebrown I was not calling these people swine, I was using an expression we are all familiar with, a metaphor if you will, to describe in a few words, what otherwise would have taken many. You both chose to concentrate on thinking I was calling people swine, rather than considering what I meant by "pearls"
but....relating the pearls before swine expression to the longer paragraph right above it in my previous post......
Pears before swine in this instance could more be taken as "fit your actions to your audience"
Yes ebrown, YOU would appreciate being told upfront that there was a problem between the kids....YOU would then find some way to resolve or accept the situation......YOU would not have a problem with any of this...YOU would be the type of audience that could accept the truth, and deal with it.
Now let's talk about risk....weighing the risk of a bad outcome x performing an action to an unknown factor.
The parents are an unknown factor.
They MIGHT respond well.
They MIGHT seek to remedy, or accept.
or
They MIGHT be offended, and tell you.
They MIGHT be offended and not tell you.
They MIGHT, because of that, somehow let the daughter know they think the Linkats act like they're too good for them.
They MIGHT, even unconsciously, promote the daughter to act poorly toward little linkat.
I could go on with a bunch of other MIGHT's, none of which are pleasant.
The parents might very well get very embarrassed at linkat telling them the truth. Ebrown would not, but ebrown can't control how other people take his well meaning truth.
If these were people that meant quite a bit to the linkat and linkette family, they were people that they mutually desired a friendship, or relationship at some time, it would be worth the risk of telling them the truth, knowing there would be other occassions to work out their differences.
This is not the case.
Linkat doesn't seem to want to be great friends with the parents.
Her girl doesn't want to be friends with a kid that in the past as pulled her into the bathroom and told her to take down her pants so she could see her underwear, then showed her hers. Her girl doesn't want to be friends with someone who pits one group of children against another, apparantly because for her it's fun.
Like david said, and I was totally agreeing with you david, telling them the truth in this case runs a much better chance of creating an unpleasant undercurrent, retaliation, and hard feelings, a feud. I did not advocate being discourteous to them, I advocated backing out of the invitation and letting the parents save face by not bluntly saying our kids don't get along.
The truth does not have to come out in one big fell swoop, like a boulder. Looking at the audience, the swine, it might be better to let the truth be known in a way that may take several steps.
Is this party situation the opportune time to bring up all of the problems with the other girl? Probably not....they'll be more appropriate situations in the futre to present these people with your gift of pearls.
BTW, I believe pearls in this expression stands for bits of wisdom, as the word for pearl derives from the word for wisdom.
I believe swine in this expression stands for someone who is ignorant at this time, and not ready for the wisdom.
ebrown is ready for the pearls.
It's unknown if the parents are ready for them, and if I were linkat I would lay low until I could ascertain if they were ready for them. But, since the party is this weekend....better to give them a pretty trinket that won't offend, but keeps them from casting back something not so nice.