@farmerman,
Quote:(I recall that most of your retreats from discourse was to claim how you "reverse designed. or"worked out the mathematics" or did the math modelling".
So now you have retreated to the "conceptual" eh?
Which way do you want to be remembered??
1.If its as a math whiz, I think all weve been asking is that we be able to SEE YOUR WORK(Did teachers in your country use that term?)
2 If it is as a "Grand Conceptualizer" , then perhaps we should be able to just hear your propositions and givens.
Conceptualizing is much more fun. Here is the math. It is not new it just shows how much easier it is to explain where the constants come from if you know what the structure of higgs bosons, the higgs field, and matter looks like. The explanation is harder to write than this simple math. The structure is easy to understand but hard to explain without a designer. There is nothing I can do about that though.
Fine structure constant can be defined as:
e=.8542455 or 85.42455 % of the strong force if you set the strong force equal to one. For any arbitrary length , the fine-structure constant is the ratio of two energies: (i) the energy needed to bring two electrons from infinity to a distance of against their electrostatic repulsion, and (ii) the energy of a single photon of wavelength . (or the weak force strong force ratio.) According to the theory of renormalization group, the value of the fine-structure constant (the strength of the electromagnetic interaction) depends on the energy scale. In fact, it grows logarithmically as the energy is increased. The observed value of is associated with the energy scale of the electron mass; the energy scale does not run below this because the electron (and the positron) is the lightest charged object whose quantum loops can contribute to the running. Therefore, we can say that 1/137.036 is the value of the fine-structure constant at zero energy. Moreover, as the energy scale increases, the electromagnetic interaction approaches the strength of the other two interactions, which is important for the theories of grand unification. If quantum electrodynamics were an exact theory, the fine-structure constant would actually diverge at an energy known as the Landau pole. This fact makes quantum electrodynamics inconsistent beyond the perturbative expansions.(from physical interpretation opf the fine structure constant) This would be the weak force strong force ratio as measured at the lowest energy level.
If the energy or spatial density of the electron is kept constant, at zero energy level or 2 degrees K is approached, spatial density or order must increase. At this highest level of order the angle of 58.6764 degrees is determined.
e=.8542455
inv sin(e)=58.6764 degrees
Since the fine structure constant is the ratio between the force separating two electrons which have received order by being a particle in matter (By receiving order, I mean the electrons as particles are following a specific path through their respective atoms by interacting with the quarks of the nucleus and the virtual particles of the higgs field through the higgs mechanism.) and the strong force holding the particles in the nucleus. That means 100 percent of the rotational energy that can be transferred is determined by inv sine(1) which equals 90 degrees. That is why when energy transfers across the nucleus of an atom (quantum tunneling) 100 percent of the energy transfers. But since atoms are tumbling in the higgs field and if one is to assume that both the higgs field and the atom are made up of embedded higgs bosons as suggested in embedded dimesions, the closest the particles can get to a perfect energy transfer is 60 degrees rather than the perfect 90 degrees. This is comparing energy flowing in order in the nucleus of atom to disorder in between two atoms as they interact where their electron clouds come into contact. If the quarks and virtual quarks had no permittivity, the electrons would couple at 60 degrees. That would make the fine structure constant sine(60degrees) or.866 without considering permittivity. But since permittivity and permeability of free space must be considered measured value of .854255 for the fine structure constant reveals that the electrons couple at 58.674 degrees at the lowest energy level.
This is lower than the 59.51 degrees that can be similarly backed out using Boltzmans constant of 8.617339 and dividing it by 10 to account for the embedded layer of order required when combining two higgs boson to create a unit of matter thus, giving us sine(.8617339). The gas law which requires less order (or less difference in spatial density in the higgs field) because a magnetic field must be set up to measure the fine structure constant. This magnetic field lowers the entropy or spatial density of the higgs field when compared to the hiffs field in the perfect gas measurement. Complete entropy, or maximum disorder, is the definition of a perfect gas.
This difference in constants brought on by changes in entropy is the same process Eric Verlinde used to explain gravity in Entropic Gravity.
I can explain that 10 to 1 ratio in more detail if you wish. The trick is it can only be explained by understanding the construction of a multidimensional universe before attempting to explain it mathematically. Even then backing out that 10 to 1 ratio purely mathematically might not be possible (because how does permittivity and permeability transfer across universes mathematically). But that 10 to 1 ratio is why the simple math I did is hiding from people who are basing physics purely on mathematical constructs.
I can also geometrically back out the other constants including the gravitational constant. The gravitational constant is a volume ratio constant rather than a a ratio comparing rotational energy.
