@farmerman,
Quote:doesnt that presume that you first KNOW something about how"all the systems coexist and are composed or originate?
I don't presume anything, I am not God nor am I smart enough to know things by presumption.
Quote:1. you ignore the age of the earth and the evidence for the appearance of sveral genera (including hominids and hominins).
2. Youve asserted that youve "back engineered an Intelligence but thats just you blowin smoke out your ass (I humbly submit based on your reticence to "Share" your deep insights of life and "BJ's biochemistry" .
Instead, I ask the proper questions and then do as thorough of a study of all the the available evidence so as to reach as clear of an understanding of how the systems coexist as I can that day. After 30 years It is getting clearer.
Quote:1. you ignore the age of the earth and the evidence for the appearance of sveral genera (including hominids and hominins).]
No I don't. I believe the Earth is very old. Most dating processes are based on the presumption that:
1. The entire universe that has a 300 billion light year diameter today, had a diameter of .5 milimeters at the initiation of the Big Bang and all helium and hydrogen came into existence near that point in space by some unexplained natural process.
2. That the universe was deteriorating everywhere and all the time in the same way it is today.
I believe those two presumptions are wrong because the data suggests otherwise.
I believe:
A. Matter existed before the Big Bang. ( and more than likely all matter)
B. The only thing that has inflated since the Big Bang is matter and the Higgs Field where it interacts with matter. And, that change in spatial density caused by the uneven inflation between:
1. matter and the higgs field that interacts with matter
and
2. the higgs field that doesn't interact with matter because, in empty space there is no matter
And, that is why we have gravity and the different. nuclear forces we observe and experience.
I think the evidence supports.
1. The Big Bang is a inflationary transition event where the rate of decay started to change and, that change occurred from the center of the universe and worked out from there over a long period of time. (and that is what Hubble observed is his Red Shift and, we observe in the density fluctuations from the WMAP.)
2. The Big Bang could possibly be the events described in the Bible and other ancient oral traditions as the flood event and, the Earth is the actual Ark of Noah.
Quote:1. you ignore the age of the earth and the evidence for the appearance of sveral genera (including hominids and hominins).
2. Youve asserted that youve "back engineered an Intelligence but thats just you blowin smoke out your ass (I humbly submit based on your reticence to "Share" your deep insights of life and "BJ's biochemistry" .
I think biochemistry is a very small part of the entire story and was quite different before the Big Bang Transition event.
Quote:3. You seem to rely on folk stories over evidence and if evidence refutes your folk tales, you cling to the folk tales. Kinda baloneyish Id say.
In think it is baloneyish to assume the universe had a diameter .5 milimeters and the order in matter popped out of nothing. They have no evidence suggesting that is true pure beyond speculation. Plus they have no explanation for why we have gravity and the nuclear forces. I do. It has to do with entropic gravity.
