@cicerone imposter,
You're just in denial ci. It's all about sex.
Have you seen the plants. They are sex mad. They have every combination of male and female: monogamy, polygamy, polyandry, group sex, orgies and a few, I believe, see to themselves. Life comes from a common ancestor. Plants can be soothed by certain sounds and colours.
Luther and his henchmen had the hots for the nuns. They had Pantagreul's problem with the ladies of the toffs and the ladies of the peasants and the artisans, who were peasants with nifty fingers, were beneath them as members of the estate in between. (Except in emergencies I mean but even then it must have left them with a profound sense of self-disgust. All that learning come to this.) Media is now a sort of estate in between.
Springing the nuns was a raging imperitive. Luther married one as soon as he was confident that his Prince would protect him if he took on the might of Rome. All the stuff about the Holy Ghost and the Papacy being a secular invention and Jesus being present in the Eucharist were just sophistical wranglings. Like whether there was a Flood or not. Getting Sister Simperteena spreadeagled or up on her hands and knees I suppose, missionaries not having been invented then, was the objective whilst not being ostracised or worse. Maintaining one's status as the man of God all the while.
The objective here is to make it respectable to shag anybody or anything or be shagged by anybody or anything. I don't say "fucked" because that word has a specific meaning. In theology at least.
And I'm not arguing against that. It might well be the best way forward. I'm arguing against pulling the wool over everybody's eyes so that they will choose that without really knowing and without therefore considering the implications. The "controversial issues" wande reported on from Texas. The things one doesn't talk about in public places.
Was that logical enough?