In order to give readers of this thread a respite from witterings I thought it might amuse them to read a short segment from A Popular History of the Reformation by Mgr Philip Hughes of, I assume, Notre Dame de Lac, Indiana.
It sets out more carefully than usual the important aspects of the "straw man" in order that those who employ the device, consciously or otherwise, might meditate upon the matter more than the evidence suggests that they do.
Quote:To caricature the other side, and to spend oneself destroying the caricature with hot indignation and scorn, is a controversial tactic much older than Luther, and it has survived his age to flourish in our own as though it were only just devised.
And the caricature of religion which anti-IDers have erected, here, as well as in higher academic circles, even peer-reviewed ones, is such that everything they say or write upon the subject is one giant straw man so large that it couldn't be removed from a barn which had doors of sufficient width for the anti-IDer to get his head through. And that's some barn door.
But I strongly recommend this book, not only because of how beautifully written it is, but also because it might help those who still retain a semblence of an open mind to get some inkling of what they are talking about before they hold forth in that very predictable, and so easily recognised, "voice of the gonads" tone which has been imaged on many occasions as a wolf howling at the moon which is the fundamental subtext of the Reformation from the beginning and through our own times.