Latest Challenges to the Teaching of Evolution

It's an explanation of why scientists and their awestruck lickspittals and lackeys, who know no science themselves, should take over the running of the country and change the whole course of the nation into the communist direction where power alone controls everything.

It seeks to give credibilty to statements such as "needed to be repeated", as dictats, in the face of a school board in a high flying district which, having heard arguments from members of the community, decided to keep Schaefer on the taxpayer-funded payroll. Presumably because he's a great teacher and an asset to the educational system.

And a school board which doesn't listen to blurts of the Orwellian type " Anti-ID good, ID bad" which offer no further justification.

I answered that.

"Latest Challenges to the Teaching of Evolution"
Well that is the title of the thread!
And evolution is creation or simply the theoretical origin of everything.
Right?

=

Of coarse; but what you are trying to imply is that creationism (religious belief) is the basis of evolution. Doesn't work that way. Do you understand simple logic?

Science has proven evolution; creationism originates from believing the bible, a fictional book written by many much after (about 100 years) of the so-called savior. No eye-witness event; just hearsay; most from mythology.

Logically speaking,
A theory is a theory and the basis of evolution is creation.
Evolution is a creation theory and nothing more.
I would call it creationism, wouldn't you?
The Big Bang theory is most certainly too.

=

You are going into an area about theory as if this was not already discussed ad nauseum. It's because you have no understanding what science is, and believe in fairy tales dictated by your comic book called the bible.

Put another way, please show us proof of a) world flood, b) virgin birth, c) all the miracles described in your comic book, d) the earth is 7,000 years old, and e) god exists.

To believe in science or religion,
Ye must have faith.
I have none of that,
Only the truth,

=

As far as God existing, all I can tell you truthfully is I do.
And think God is simply another name for everything which we are all an equal part of, aren't you.

You are conflicted in your own statements. Try to figure out why. You need to study logic.

Scientific explanations require understanding, not faith.

Why does science call its theories theories?
Why not simply the truth?
Is for example: The big bang theory much like the evolution theory which is much like the creation theory a belief, a theory, a faith, an understanding or simply true or untrue?

=

It's because you have no concept of evidence and facts; it's the very fundamental understanding and foundation of what science is.

What is science but a measured belief in ideas?
I find great flaws in that, flaws in measure, beliefs, theories, science, religion, and ideas, don't you?

=

Your definition of science is convenient to your superstition, but it is inaccurate.

then dont trust your toaster.

I don't!

What is the accuracy of science but quantum mechanical or probable or uncertain at best?
Dice anyone?

=

Would you bet on something witha 99% return frequency? How about 95%. Just wondering?

Good ?

The best bet is not to bet at all!

=

Evidently, you don't even understand the idea of chance in rolling the dice, and you talk about faith and science as being on the same scale. Have you ever studied statistics? Do you understand anything about the bell curve and how that applies to scientific findings?

How about fact finding in the bible?

Einstein didn't either.
God doesn'y play dice, do you?

=