@cicerone imposter,
How come there are millions of people who have not been manipulated by Creationism. The majority on this thread, and you set great store by that majority, have not been manipulated by Creationism except in the sense of having certain moral values inculcated indirectly by its influence. And the same with a very large number of Americans and Europeans. When it ceases to exist there will be a monopoly manipulation by atheists. There will not be no manipulation. If you weren't so thick I would accuse you of lying through your teeth. You are far too emotionally engaged with this matter, for whatever reasons, forget all about your superior intelligence, to have anything worthwhile to contribute. You troll the thread with every post and with the same repetitive drivel. It's way over your head. Your little majority claque agreeing I'm the troll is fatuous.
I'm all for misleading kids. And don't try pretending that you are not.
You're being misleading in that post. You are implying that it is a choice between evolution and creationism and it is not. Nowhere near. I doubt very much that any of the main spokespersons against teaching evolution exclusively, and without reference to problems with it, are creationists in the way you mean. They are concerned that a raft of atheist teachers will go into the nation's classrooms and promote their atheism alongside evolution. Belittling the Bible and the Church at every chance they get.
That you present the case in such a simplistic fashion when it it highly complex is extremely misleading. Ignoring the complexity is mere self-indulgence and that is self-evidently not a luxury many senior politicians have allowed themselves. Dawkins is not elected and has no responsibilities.