61
   

Latest Challenges to the Teaching of Evolution

 
 
farmerman
 
  0  
Reply Thu 17 Mar, 2011 10:23 am
@cicerone imposter,
I beleive that the
eaknesses" of evolution are bald face assertions that
1There is nopthing in the STratigraphic record

2No interme3dite fossil;s exist

3Genetics denies, rather than supports, evolution.

This is all bullshit of course, but remember, every so often we have gunga show up to try to say these same things.
Setanta
 
  0  
Reply Thu 17 Mar, 2011 10:27 am
@wandeljw,
I don't see what the problem is here. Anyone contemplating a political career, contemplating running for public office, needs the essential skill of being able to lie with a straight face. He or she must be able to contradict him- or herself while denying that there is any contradiction (figuratively, nodding one's head while saying "no," or shaking one's head while saying "yes"). It seems to me that Mr. Cardella has mastered this essential political skill.
cicerone imposter
 
  0  
Reply Thu 17 Mar, 2011 10:28 am
@farmerman,
I'd forgotten about those assertions, because they are not factual nor has any support in science. False trivia is not my forte.
farmerman
 
  1  
Reply Thu 17 Mar, 2011 10:41 am
@cicerone imposter,
Anything, said loud enough, and ofetn enough, will gather interest.
As gunga tries to do, by flooding a post with bullshit quotes of cut and paste , someone will think he knows of what he speaks.
SO too, these "strengths and weaknesses" statements.
Our knowledge base of supportive evidence is so vast that Gunga has no idea that the shoit he quotes (30 year old misquotes) isnt even an issue of discussion any longer.

0 Replies
 
wandeljw
 
  1  
Reply Thu 17 Mar, 2011 11:24 am
@Setanta,
Setanta wrote:

I don't see what the problem is here. Anyone contemplating a political career, contemplating running for public office, needs the essential skill of being able to lie with a straight face. He or she must be able to contradict him- or herself while denying that there is any contradiction (figuratively, nodding one's head while saying "no," or shaking one's head while saying "yes"). It seems to me that Mr. Cardella has mastered this essential political skill.


Illinois politicians have raised this skill to a level that will never be surpassed.
farmerman
 
  0  
Reply Thu 17 Mar, 2011 11:57 am
@wandeljw,
So, the question for Mr Cardella is really:
"Are you that dumb, or do you think the voter is that dumb?"
0 Replies
 
spendius
 
  1  
Reply Thu 17 Mar, 2011 12:41 pm
@cicerone imposter,
Gee ci!! You almost wrote my post for me.

Have they ever identified what those "strengths and weaknesses" were? Nice wording with nothing to support it; just words. That's what science does to people; they become more ignorant and aggressive.

The NCSE only wishes to discuss strengths and weaknesses in such a way that the manner of their discussion proves their point. Open up the debate to points of view taking social consequences into account and they go all petulant, say they are off topic and, if that doesn't shut them up, put them on Ignore. Which is ignorant and aggressive.

If they happen to read the following passage, which is most unlikely as it will be on Ignore, but if it isn't it will be after they have read it.

Quote:
If we were to lay a charge of madness against every great genius who does not share the science undergraduate's fatuous belief in headlong materialism now held in such high regard, little would remain of world art and history. Such a slaughter of the innocents would include most of the peripatetic system, all medieval metaphysics, an entire wing in the immense, symmetrical edifice built by the angelic doctor, St. Thomas Aquinas, the idealism of Berkeley and (note the coincidence) the very scepticism that leads us to Hume.


James Joyce. From an article in Il Piccolo della Sera based on lectures at the University of Trieste.

0 Replies
 
spendius
 
  1  
Reply Thu 17 Mar, 2011 12:44 pm
@cicerone imposter,
I'm content to let the viewers decide whether those five posts were foam from the mouth or not. I advise anybody who thinks they are not foam from the mouth to take remedial elementary education lessons wherever they can get them.
cicerone imposter
 
  0  
Reply Thu 17 Mar, 2011 12:58 pm
@spendius,
That's fair, and I agree.
spendius
 
  2  
Reply Thu 17 Mar, 2011 01:21 pm
@farmerman,
Quote:
Yes but ALL of your posts are concerned with communicating with your readers.


Yes--but ci's posts are aimed at the under fives and it is easier to communicate with them than with intelligent grown-ups as I try to do.

You lot know nothing about these matters. You haven't even become aware yet that there is a spectrum of institutional manipulation on which the modern school has only prisons and asylums nearer to one end. And the inmates of those have constitutional protections under the 1st and 5th which the kids don't have.

Any fool can communicate what ci. does. Try communicating the complexity of that spectrum sometime. Putting it on Ignore is real ignorance. But it's fairly easy to communicate the conclusion after studying it which those who have never heard of it can't or daren't do. It is that the drive of anti-IDers is total control of the kid's minds in the name of scientific materialism and to render them addicted to being controlled and loving it.

Quote:
Highways result from a perversion of the desire and need for mobility into the demand for a private car. Schools themselves pervert the natural inclination to grow and learn into the demand for instruction. Demand for manufactured maturity is a far greater abnegation of self-initiated activity than the demand for manufactured goods. Schools are not only to the right of highways and cars; they belong near the extreme of the institutional spectrum occupied by total asylums. Even the producers of body counts kill only bodies. By making men abdicate the responsibility for their own growth, school leads many to a kind of spiritual suicide.


Ivan Illich. Deschooling Society. Chapter 4--Institutional Spectrum. Section--Schools as False Public Utilities.

These anti-IDers are either on the gravy train of well paid manipulative control or have some other pressing need about which I have possibly said enough. Or dupes being manipulated themselves.

And I'm not concerned which. I'm only concerned with the results if they win the argument and so should any American be. And Englishman.

And the Church is self evidently at the other end of the spectrum mainly because it is not compulsory as schooling is but also because it doesn't manipulate all that many people and even then not very much.

So it's a debate about freedom. And anti-IDers don't want you to have any so that their assertions become law. I can't understand why anybody gives them the time of day. Control freaks to a man and woman. The whole lot of them. And kids in a classroom, departments in a college and whole universities are really exciting to control. Some say sexually exciting.
cicerone imposter
 
  0  
Reply Thu 17 Mar, 2011 01:25 pm
@spendius,
spendi wrote,
Quote:
Yes--but ci's posts are aimed at the under fives ...


That's a lesson I learned while working in management; my boss told me to use language that the dumbest manager will understand. You belong in that group, so don't blame me for the level of information I must resort to.
spendius
 
  1  
Reply Thu 17 Mar, 2011 02:20 pm
@cicerone imposter,
I can understand your posts and those of your claque. You can't understand mine. So how you arrive at that conclusion is hard to fathom.

What the control freak wants is to define "executive truth". Put him or her in a claque of control freaks and they think they have the right to define "executive truth" with nothing but their assertions all of which serve their interests most of which are unsavoury when critically thought through. And if they win through they have no-one left to control but themselves and that's when the **** hits the fan.
reasoning logic
 
  0  
Reply Thu 17 Mar, 2011 03:05 pm
@spendius,
spendius wrote:

I can understand your posts and those of your claque. You can't understand mine. So how you arrive at that conclusion is hard to fathom.

What the control freak wants is to define "executive truth". Put him or her in a claque of control freaks and they think they have the right to define "executive truth" with nothing but their assertions all of which serve their interests most of which are unsavoury when critically thought through. And if they win through they have no-one left to control but themselves and that's when the **** hits the fan.


When you say "executive truth"

Are you referring to a religious person trying to to speak as if they have an empirical understanding of how the world should be educated by the traditions of the catholic church?
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  0  
Reply Thu 17 Mar, 2011 03:06 pm
@spendius,
What in the world is "executive truth?" Never heard of such a thing.
spendius
 
  1  
Reply Thu 17 Mar, 2011 04:27 pm
@cicerone imposter,
There you go then. Never heard of the institutional manipulation spectrum either. And both are in play for your project. Bigtime.
Ionus
 
  1  
Reply Thu 17 Mar, 2011 04:33 pm
@spendius,
Quote:
School is a corrupt racket and has nothing to do with kids.
Teachers tend to be adults who like power but cant achieve it with other adults around . Take homework...studies show that good students want to do homework . Thats it . There is nothing else...no other links . So teachers who want to demonstrate their p0wer even when the child has gone home insist on homework, regardless of whether the circumstances are suitable for that child and despite it not being associated with good results . Why would you trust a teacher to determine what is to be taught ? Do we get bus drivers to design buses and then build them ?
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Thu 17 Mar, 2011 04:35 pm
@spendius,
I understand what "institutional manipulation" means, but you still haven't explained what "executive truth" means.
Ionus
 
  1  
Reply Thu 17 Mar, 2011 04:37 pm
@plainoldme,
Quote:
Your understanding is wrong.
And their you have it . For devotees, their is nothing more to be said . God has spoken . Dont worry about facts .
Ionus
 
  1  
Reply Thu 17 Mar, 2011 04:41 pm
@cicerone imposter,
Quote:
the only manipulation going on is by creationists trying to include ID into science curriculum
Oh really ! And what do you call the manipulation of society that will follow if we are all indoctrinated atheists ?

Quote:
Misleading kids is their only goal.
You mean like science is always right and school books never change .
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Thu 17 Mar, 2011 04:41 pm
@Ionus,
"Their" is nothing more to be said. Yeah. LOL
 

Related Topics

 
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.09 seconds on 07/18/2025 at 02:11:29