@wandeljw,
Quote:Biology teachers are of special significance because many high school students take biology but no other science classes.
There you are. Biology's easy you see. Until you get into the chemistry and physics of cells and the effects of emotions on them. But that won't be in the curriclum I shouldn't think.
Simply rote learn catalogues of long names and you "major" and your "major" is not in the same league as a physics, chemistry or mathematics major. And unintelligent people can do rote learning if they come from pushy middle-class backgrounds. Or at least enough to be given a pass by those authorities which are scared to fail more than a few.
In Asia they probably don't do evolution at all in schools because they are looking to fish the whole pool for those few who can understand real science who are congenitally at odds with rote learning.
So from a scientific point of view--the analysis of pure dynamic space--it is the promotion of the simple pseudo-science of evolution that is cowardly and masking the cowardice behind the "majors" to distract from the fact that they are there for the taking from educational establishments which employ teachers who don't do real science either but simply dictate screeds from Darwin and give out passes for being able to regurgitate them in exams.
And one can hardly talk down to people quite so efficiently as to opine--
Quote:As I do the arithmetic, that means an astounding 72 percent of our teachers don't teach the organizing principle at the base of modern biological science.
after already having written that 28% do. That's how easy the writer's arthmetic is. "As I do the arithmetic" eh--Ye Gods. "As I fill up another two lines to get the editor's quota done" is more like it. And Kirsten wants to give us lessons on science and cowardice. Bloody hell!!!