@Lightwizard,
Its too bad, (This finding), since the footprints are without context or linneage to connect them to a series of parent species. The story of Tiktaalik is certainly more robust in that it uses the predictive sense of paleo .
This specimen will have to do as an EIfilian member of a heretofore unrecognized bunch of already evolved (and qppqrently more advanced) amphibians.
It must be remembered that the Frasnian appearnaces of amphibians were more of an artifact due to some serious global orogenies and splitting of continents that were going on. The inter European basins of the eifilian period just preced atime of major glaciation as (IMHO) sea channels changed as continents changed in position within Gondwana.
I actually have to say that. finding this specimen , amkes the story of tetrapod evolution come back to a more gradual time line, rather than a"high speed" evo track that the Tiktaalik find would have reinforced.
No matter what, the detail of micro stratigraphy has prevailed in determining the timeline in which this foot print was found.
TOO bad they kept their mouths shut while the Tiktaalik story was being reported by all the pop science sections of newspapers.
Sic Transit Gloria Mundi Ted and Neil