@Lightwizard,
I figgered that the argument wasnt too "learned" , however, the guys at ICR, like STeve Austen, who is a really sharp geologist, will present these really great arguments against an old earth by starting with several good arguments against isotopic decay rates and what occurs in crystals. The argumenst, while interesting and scholarly, are short lived because someone will actually go out and measure the field data and come back with data that supports the "Old Earth" argument. Then Steve will shut up for a few months until he comes back with another really great argument.
Its always something with those Creationist guys. If theyd spend time doing real research, they could actually contribute. Instead they have their heads (also) wedged snugly up their anal orifii that they acnnot detect the sunlight of knowledge.