@wandeljw,
wandeljw wrote:
TEXAS UPDATE
Quote:ACLU expresses concern over creationism in schools
(Ben Wermund, The Daily Texan, August 3, 2009)
“It’s the climate in Texas that makes us very interested in [religion],” said Dotty Griffith, the ACLU of Texas’ public education director. “We are always against any initiative of government-imposed religion. We’re all in favor of teaching about religion, but we are not in favor of proselytizing or promoting one religion over another.”
A very reasonable stance.
Quote:“Our biggest concern, frankly, is the process by which they make these determinations,” Burke said. “Where do these experts come from? Who are these experts? Somebody who has been the co-chair of the state Republican Party is, in my opinion, not an expert on history.”
These are good questions even in a more general nature. Just how is the veracity of any information determined? We need to be able to rely on the credibility of our higher learning centers and the degrees they assign. At present, only science as a profession has some measurement of veracity built into the process. Almost every other subject (such as history and sociology) have subjective measurements of veracity.
Creationists are pushing to have various degree programs accepted in major universities. They have generally failed to get these accepted in the sciences and medicine (thank god), but the same may not be assumed for other disciplines.
There is a larger problem evolving here in which the sheer volume of information now available in our society is making it more difficult to determine veracity simply by availability. In the past there was a cost to the production and distribution of information, so only the more potent information exceeded the cost of production, but that natural barrier is breaking down.